Jump to content

Sprint Ends Throttling of Unlimited Plans


dkyeager

Recommended Posts

http://www.wirelessweek.com/news/2015/06/sprint-ends-throttling-unlimited-plans

 

I did not see the other policy of overloaded site based limits for the biggest users as totally bad, although the throttled levels were severe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.wirelessweek.com/news/2015/06/sprint-ends-throttling-unlimited-plans

 

I did not see the other policy of overloaded site based limits for the biggest users as totally bad, although the throttled levels were severe.

It does say Unlimited is not to stay, so keep it if you got it while you can!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, every time this was previously discussed, I questioned if Sprint had ever actually throttled anyone. Surely if they had and someone had evidence of it people would be screaming it at the top of their lungs on Fierce and just generally freaking out on the internet. I guess it never actually happened.

 

 

Whereas IIRC there was evidence of T-Mobile doing it before they even formally announced it.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

See, every time this was previously discussed, I questioned if Sprint had ever actually throttled anyone. Surely if they had and someone had evidence of it people would be screaming it at the top of their lungs on Fierce and just generally freaking out on the internet. I guess it never actually happened.

 

 

Whereas IIRC there was evidence of T-Mobile doing it before they even formally announced it.

Sometimes it's hard to know if your being throttled because there capacity is so bad in alot of areas its like a permanent throttle. But I would say this is not good news at all especially for non spark markets. Unlimited may need to go soon.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes it's hard to know if your being throttled because there capacity is so bad in alot of areas its like a permanent throttle. But I would say this is not good news at all especially for non spark markets. Unlimited may need to go soon.

I'm not sure how many Sprint markets there are in the US that are so congested that they are down to 2G speeds, but I'm guessing there isn't many. The whole "permanent throttle" argument isn't really valid anymore.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how many Sprint markets there are in the US that are so congested that they are down to 2G speeds, but I'm guessing there isn't many. The whole "permanent throttle" argument isn't really valid anymore.

 

-Anthony

Not really on market basis but certain towers in congested markets with no band 41 does have 2G speeds. I have seen it on plenty of towers so it is a valid argument. Root metrics shows similar results in plenty of markets

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how many Sprint markets there are in the US that are so congested that they are down to 2G speeds, but I'm guessing there isn't many. The whole "permanent throttle" argument isn't really valid anymore.

 

-Anthony

 

Come to Baltimore :-)

 

There are definitely some areas where Band 25/26 is below 1Mbps, and Band 41 either isn't active on that tower, or the range is terrible because its a CLEAR site.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really on market basis but certain towers in congested markets with no band 41 does have 2G speeds. I have seen it on plenty of towers so it is a valid argument. Root metrics shows similar results in plenty of markets

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Exactly. It's only certain towers. A couple of towers in an entire market is not enough to say that there is a permanent throttle in place because of congestion.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. It's only certain towers. A couple of towers in an entire market is not enough to say that there is a permanent throttle in place because of congestion.

 

-Anthony

It's probably more than a couple tower in a entire market more like 15-30% per market other wise sprints speeds would at least line up with At&t in most markets.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

other wise sprints speeds would at least line up with At&t in most markets.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

AT&T also had multiple competitive advantages over Sprint: AT&T has much more low-band spectrum than Sprint (which means they could cover a lot more people with LTE a lot wuicker and easier), AT&T has HSPA+ (which already puts Sprint at a disadvantage because of how much higher throughout HSPA+ has than EVDO Rev. A), and AT&T has also purchased a lot of smaller carriers that help expand their coverage and their spectrum portfolio, etc. etc.

 

You can't try and compare Sprint with AT&T when Sprint isn't at AT&T's level yet. That's like saying "why doesn't T-Mobile have as good of coverage as Verizon?". It's just not fair. Not yet.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T also had multiple competitive advantages over Sprint: AT&T has much more low-band spectrum than Sprint (which means they could cover a lot more people with LTE a lot wuicker and easier), AT&T has HSPA+ (which already puts Sprint at a disadvantage because of how much higher throughout HSPA+ has than EVDO Rev. A), and AT&T has also purchased a lot of smaller carriers that help expand their coverage and their spectrum portfolio, etc. etc.

 

You can't try and compare Sprint with AT&T when Sprint isn't at AT&T's level yet. That's like saying "why doesn't T-Mobile have as good of coverage as Verizon?". It's just not fair. Not yet.

 

-Anthony

T-Mobile is attempting to have very close coverage to Verizon. If they can secure some low band spectrum in places where they have none they could very well do that. Plus Sprint has nationwide 800. You must mean capacity not coverage. That's the point more capacity deployed is obviously a better experience. Sprint has the least of the 4 deployed thus the experience is not great in plenty places just passable.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must mean capacity not coverage.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

No, I meant coverage. It's going to take years for T-Mobile to be at the point that Verizon is at. T-Mobile doesn't have LTEiRA like Verizon does, which in and of itself gives Verizon a HUGE upper hand. And T-Mobile has nowhere near nationwide low-band spectrum, and it's going to be awhile before they do (Ch. 51 interference and having to wait for 600 MHz auction, if it ever happens, and waiting for that spectrum to be deployable, AND getting equipment that can broadcast it, along with UE that cam connect to it).

 

Anyways, this argument is off-topic for this thread. So I'm going to secede from it before it goes any further.

 

-Anthony

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I meant coverage. It's going to take years for T-Mobile to be at the point that Verizon is at. T-Mobile doesn't have LTEiRA like Verizon does, which in and of itself gives Verizon a HUGE upper hand. And T-Mobile has nowhere near nationwide low-band spectrum, and it's going to be awhile before they do (Ch. 51 interference and having to wait for 600 MHz auction, if it ever happens, and waiting for that spectrum to be deployable, AND getting equipment that can broadcast it, along with UE that cam connect to it).

 

Anyways, this argument is off-topic for this thread. So I'm going to secede from it before it goes any further.

 

-Anthony

Agreed. Off topic. Convo over.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Luckily, that hasn't arisen in my area where I am, aside from having B14 (well, ALL of AT&T signal) not work at all in Coosa county, Alabama. I wish there was a service for first responders that would go to ANY available carrier, provider, etc..and in the absolute worst case scenario, would give us service. I've been on an ambulance, trying to find an address, and my driver actually had to pull over and we pulled out a map book and tried to find the road using the "old fashioned way".. and that takes valuable time away that sometimes may be vital to someone surviving. BUT, I will say that I've only seen that in Coosa county... both my Tmo and AT&T phones had zero service and I couldn't get GPS, and neither could my driver (VZW service). Maybe satellite will help with that in those times where that occurs.. but that's an extreme example.     Edit to add: Let me add some context to this.. Coosa county isn't regular coverage area for my job.. so it's not a regular thing that we are dispatched to Coosa county.. and actually, there's been a change and that county now has it's own ambulance service that operates.. so the only time we might receive a request is if it's a multiple casualty scenario, or it's a transfer going home from our contracted hospital.  The way that reads above, it may seem like we are just out without some sort of GPS gadget to direct us on where to go, but for the most part, we know our coverage area pretty well. Dispatch can also give us cross streets for reference inside our coverage area (and our home county). Coosa just isn't a regular area for my job to run in. 
    • "Priority" doesn't mean "exclusivity."  When emergency services don't need B14, AT&T can use it for everyone else.  The trade-off is that when it is needed for emergency services, they not only get all of B14, but they have also arranged for priority on the rest of the AT&T network as well.  Beats having spectrum sitting unused most of the time and then not having enough when disaster strikes, as it could be without a partnership with a wireless company like AT&T. - Trip
    • I've wondered if being on the first responder plan has the priority over other 'regular' lines in the same way firstnet does (or, supposed to do with B14...I've seen normal customers on AT&T hit B14 so it's not {specifically} for Firstnet only)...  
    • T-Mobile prices people pay are all over the map. The free lines are key, so take them if ever offered again.  Your priority level would be a key factor for your price.  Only T-Mobile would know the average prices people pay.  Samsung has been offering very good deals at time of new model introductions so I have gone that route for factory unlocked, which allows me to also have a Verizon priority MVNO for when T-Mobile signal fails or I manually override.
    • I also wanted to post a speed test result.. I only do these once in a while from my home area because we are gonna be the last to see changes, like load balancing.  Right now they are digging all over the place for fiber installs, so I'm not sure what the hold-up is on making the upload speed a little more in-line with download speeds, but here is the most recent from my area:   https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10133670525
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...