Jump to content
lilotimz

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

Recommended Posts

Works fine for me..
I guess it just varies. But I had the T-Mobile version of RCs. And my buddy who has T-Mobile says that the RCs is unreliable. I can confirm that cuz half the time I did not get notifications saying it was even delivered.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

I guess it just varies. But I had the T-Mobile version of RCs. And my buddy who has T-Mobile says that the RCs is unreliable. I can confirm that cuz half the time I did not get notifications saying it was even delivered.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk
 

That's what I mentioned in my original post, T Mobile's implementation is all screwed up, and only works on galaxy devices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's what I mentioned in my original post, T Mobile's implementation is all screwed up, and only works on galaxy devices.
Exactly so that's why I don't use Galaxy phones anymore because RCS doesn't work right. TMobile needs to fix all of this.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlodish345 said:

The RCs doesn't work right at all. SMS actually works a lot better. Half the time I didn't even get notifications saying it was delivered.

RCS works great among my family and the people I know on Sprint. I convinced them to use Android Messages so that RCS would work between all of us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RCS works great among my family and the people I know on Sprint. I convinced them to use Android Messages so that RCS would work between all of us.
I guess I'll try Android messages then. I'll take your word for it.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

I guess I'll try Android messages then. I'll take your word for it.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk
 

Can't guarantee it works if you're not on Sprint though...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can't guarantee it works if you're not on Sprint though...
That's fine I will take my chances.

Sent from my LM-V350 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Greetings everyone. Finally reporting from the Black Hills of South Dakota and Northern Wyoming. T-Mobile has done a rock solid job in Wyoming. All mapped on Cellmapper. Only hole is at Sundance, however, a site looks like it's coming there. This gives solid T-Mobile coverage on I-90 from the South Dakota/Wyoming border through Gillette and beyond. Will map sites beyond and across to Sheridan WY after the Sturgis motorcycle rally. In South Dakota, 600mhz is here. Black Hawk SD site was upgraded yesterday. Catron Blvd site is scheduled next-LIVE date is showing 22AUG18. Keystone and Wall are also scheduled for August. Expect many more to come.  The Golden West tower in Sturgis that T-Mobile was using as a temp tower during the rally is being upgraded to a full suite permanent site. Band 2/4/12 like the other tower in Sturgis. Rapid City has been promised 4 new sites by EOY. I expect them sooner. Will advise when I know more. Things are hopping and Sprint is now in the mix as well. It's a great time for this area. 
UPDATE-Catron Blvd and Keystone sites completed. Not yet broadcasting Band 71. Assume Wall has been competed as well. Will check later this week.

Sent from my LG-H932 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Funny that when he's mentioning if you're on "X carrier you're doing it wrong" he doesn't mention Sprint. I love it!

 

What I don't love is I'm beginning to like John. What is happening to me??

 

-Anthony

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Funny that when he's mentioning if you're on "X carrier you're doing it wrong" he doesn't mention Sprint. I love it!
 
What I don't love is I'm beginning to like John. What is happening to me??
 
-Anthony
You're falling under John spell.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, anthony.spina97 said:

Funny that when he's mentioning if you're on "X carrier you're doing it wrong" he doesn't mention Sprint. I love it!

 

What I don't love is I'm beginning to like John. What is happening to me??

 

-Anthony

In the video, he mentioned Boost Mobile last as if he was hesitant to mention them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to be fair Boost is the only brand that really competes with Metro.  Cricket has their $55 unlimited plan, but it's highly throttled...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice to see band 71 in New Mexico, use to not have good signal on this area and now it's been sticking to it!!!! 22fe6426c538510617675f9481ed7f87.jpg22ea47e3b971b2fd19f070f8a08efdbf.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Carrilloevo said:

Nice to see band 71 in New Mexico, use to not have good signal on this area and now it's been sticking to it!!!! 22fe6426c538510617675f9481ed7f87.jpg22ea47e3b971b2fd19f070f8a08efdbf.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
 

Nice to see there is proper backhaul and not satellite backhaul like in some Wyoming sites. Unfortunately, -118 is pushing the limits of LTE. What area of New Mexico is this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, greenbastard said:

Nice to see there is proper backhaul and not satellite backhaul like in some Wyoming sites. Unfortunately, -118 is pushing the limits of LTE. What area of New Mexico is this?

If he's getting 22.75Mbps with his signal at -118 he's doing great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

If he's getting 22.75Mbps with his signal at -118 he's doing great!

His screenshot is showing -107 RSRP at the time of the Speedtest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, greenbastard said:

His screenshot is showing -107 RSRP at the time of the Speedtest.

True.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
True.
Does a lower RSP mean as a better signal or worse

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

Does a lower RSP mean as a better signal or worse

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
 

 

3 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

Does a lower RSP mean as a better signal or worse

Sent from my LM-G710 using Tapatalk
 

The lesser the magnitude the better (closer to zero). So -107dbm is generally better signal than -118dbm. But if I'm not mistaken RSRQ and SNR are the statistics to watch because they measure the quality of the signal not just how strong it is. RSSP includes noise from co and adjacent channel interference, thermal noise, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The lesser the magnitude the better (closer to zero). So -107dbm is generally better signal than -118dbm. But if I'm not mistaken RSRQ and SNR are the statistics to watch because they measure the quality of the signal not just how strong it is. RSSP includes noise from co and adjacent channel interference, thermal noise, etc.
At about -118 was getting from 5 to 9 mbps. But I keep staying connected all the way to - 125... And the attachment was the area I was getting band 71 on a Note92513d254ce5991d700c32f4c198180e8.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By DesignGuy
      Fierce has a poll posted... and is utilizing a bracket style contest to find out who their readers think is the most powerful person in the telecom industry. Between Marcelo and the pink clad Chihuahua of a man... I give it to Marcelo. I think the final winner should be Masa, it's is a name people know and will get to know more in the coming years worldwide. But for the current poll, it's an easy decision for me!  
       
      http://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/vote-now-to-decide-who-most-powerful-person-u-s-telecom-industry
       
       
       
    • By derrph
      With the introduction of the new plans Sprint has announced. I told one of my friends about the $60 unlimited plan and she was shocked yet happy about it. She currently has T-Mobile and there has been times where my Sprint service has out performed her service even in the city with puling up information and out of town...well... you already know how that went. She was talking about switching and stuff but then she sent me a typical article bashing Sprint and I got irritated by it and I had to explain to her that Sprint is not bad at all. These articles are based on past experiences from 3+ years ago. I told her I'm pulling 60+ mbps on LTE but she's worried about Sprint being slow ( because of what she read). Guys give me some advice on persuading her to give Sprint a chance. 
       
      I feel like articles that are being posted is what keeps away customers.  It makes no sense that T-Mobiles 2g network is not spoken about when they are in the news for changes to plans and such. But good ol Sprint makes changes and articles that get posted rips Sprint apart for filth. 
    • By belusnecropolis
      http://ces.cnet.com/8301-35284_1-57616761/how-i-got-t-mobiles-ceo-kicked-out-of-at-ts-ces-party/
      Roger Cheng @cnet appears to have had the most fun out of this, it kind of wrote the story for him I guess, so there is that. Also, just noticed the extra title Q, that is gonna drive some people nuts today. Top lel.
    • By Paynefanbro
      Am I the only one that likes to look at Verizon's coverage comparison tool. I think it gives a good idea of a carrier's generalized coverage as far as those cities that have been announced. However, it takes a while for it to get updated. I look at Verizon's map and think, no one will ever build an LTE network of that size. When I look at T-Mobile, I see a spotty, spread out network. AT&T is also spotty with a few highways covered here and there. Sprint seems to be more put together as in even if it is spotty, they are in blobs rather than random remote areas.
       
      I've also found a few places that Sprint has coverage in but not Verizon such as in southern Texas.
       
      http://www.verizonwireless.com/wcms/consumer/4g-lte.html
    • By kripatel
      I'm a former sprint customer, and recently moved to T-mobile.  The main reason I moved to T-mobile had to do with the speed of the network from the speed testing websites, and they seemed to be more reliable.  The second resons was that it was on GSM network which would allow for International roaming when abroad.  However, I've found that when T-mobile is available it is fast, but lacks indoor penetration, something I notieced of Sprint as well, it also is not available everywhere such as sprint overall coverage.  So I am now thinking of switching back to sprint because I live in Indiana and travel a lot on the road, which requires coverage that is not readily provided by T-mobile.
      My question, if and when Sprint moves LTE to 800mhz and 2.5Ghz, are new phones required to take advantage of that frequency or will the Moto X and Iphone 5s work on those bands?  Secondly, I read that Verizon will be shutting down its CDMA network sometime next year and move to Voicelte, I'm thinking this will effect Sprint coverage since I'm sure they use their network at times.  Any thoughts on that or has Sprint also announced moving to Voice over LTE?
      My main concern was with speed of the network, which when I have coverage with T-mobile, is much slower than Sprint (my wife still has sprint).  I'm not sure I understand why the network is slower on Sprint and whether that will improve over time specfiically in Indianapolis.  I appreciate any feedback so that I might move back to Sprint for the best long-term viability.
  • Posts

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×