Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

Let us be clear that some of those adds came from the MetroPCS merger, some from tablets, and some from "organic" growth. But, certainly, not all came for "organic" growth. And along for the ride with those adds from the MetroPCS merger came copious amounts of additional spectrum. You can read my fall 2012 article:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-326-newco-needs-to-drop-some-of-the-pcs-from-metropcs/

 

Even with the subscriber adds, that additional spectrum extended the "runway" in many markets. So, I feel little sympathy for T-Mobile. Network congestion -- especially getting inverted on downlink versus uplink speeds -- has become a problem of its own creation. Maybe T-Mobile should BingeOff both giving away free candy and adding new subs.

 

AJ

The Metro train was a good one to ride for T-Mobile, in terms of subscribers, spectrum, and DAS infrastructure and certain macro leases and properties.

 

I couldn't find a final subscriber count at the closing of the merger, but most pinned at ~9M. And in July 2015 ahead of the final CDMA sunset, they claimed to have captured 92% of existing CDMA subs and moved them to GSM.

 

They also quoted 500,000 remaining CDMA subscribers after that 92% capture rate. So somewhere between 6.25M-9M came from the metro base, which accounts for roughly 21-30% of the 29M+ that were added in <3Y time, depending on what the actual number was.

 

So there is still an extraordinary surge in subscriber density in tons of markets across the country, contributing to congested air links.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No issues passing through Huntsville. Network is very strong; data hovering around 25mbs during my last visit. Made several calls using VoLTE, clear and zero drops.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Just one more questiom. Is band 12 live in Houston?

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IME I've found tmobiles up close and zoomed in coverage maps to seem fairly accurate. I can at least confirm that it pretty accurately depicts coverage in my county, maybe a little bit more conservative than it actually is. I followed along some of my usual travel routes out west and nice to see everything is LTE but seems like it would be a bit patchy in a lot of places. Looks like Colorado has B12 deployed across the whole state, and the B12 and non B12 map shows a pretty big difference.

 

The zoomed out coverage map just looks like someone went on a coloring spree. Anything and everything including roaming shows up as magenta.

 

If I moved to T-Mobile permanently I'm definitely gonna need to upgrade to a B12 phone if I want good service while traveling.

 

I'm one month shy of the 1 year mark of moving to AT&T. A year ago I said I'd consider Sprint again after a year. So far in looking at sprint they haven't really done anything in the parts of Lake County, IN that I frequent. I did find a new USCC conversion site in one place I complained about before and that was it. Aside from that, no new spottings of any sites going up. i am seeing a third panel on a couple of sites and that's about it. I'm not convinced that there has been enough improvement for me to come back yet. Maybe when they get VoLTE going, cuz then they'll have to optimize LTE to fill in every gap to ensure no dropped calls.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

STL is the airport designation. That is where the abbreviation comes from. Seattle is SEA.

 

But the Root scores for SEA are out too.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/en-US/rootscore/map/metro/seattle-wa/2016/1H

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

 

Good to know!

 

I'm also glad T-Mobile was able to tie Verizon in Seattle, as it is where T-Mobile has a whole lot of spectrum, which if only they could expand that amount of spectrum to their markets where they need it, the result would be quite good.

 

One thing I wanted to add to the earlier discussions regarding BingeOn, customer gains, and congestion issues is that I was searching around the T-Mobile Reddit site and caught notice of someone mentioning beta tablet plans. I decided to take a look over at the T-Mobile tablet website and noticed something very clear to me in all of this I would have mentioned earlier had I known about this. That is on T-Mobile's tablet plans they are offering 6 gb for $15, plus $20 for the tablet fee, making it $35 monthly total for 6gb of data, including BingeOn, Data Stash, and Music Freedom. This is an incredible deal, which normally I don't pay attention to tablet offers, but if I didn't have my excellent loyalty smartphone rate, this tablet plan is what I'd choose. No wonder they are adding customers so fast, and at this price, I can see how to some people dealing with BingeOn's lesser resolution would be worth it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IME I've found tmobiles up close and zoomed in coverage maps to seem fairly accurate. I can at least confirm that it pretty accurately depicts coverage in my county, maybe a little bit more conservative than it actually is. I followed along some of my usual travel routes out west and nice to see everything is LTE but seems like it would be a bit patchy in a lot of places. Looks like Colorado has B12 deployed across the whole state, and the B12 and non B12 map shows a pretty big difference.

 

The zoomed out coverage map just looks like someone went on a coloring spree. Anything and everything including roaming shows up as magenta.

 

If I moved to T-Mobile permanently I'm definitely gonna need to upgrade to a B12 phone if I want good service while traveling.

 

I'm one month shy of the 1 year mark of moving to AT&T. A year ago I said I'd consider Sprint again after a year. So far in looking at sprint they haven't really done anything in the parts of Lake County, IN that I frequent. I did find a new USCC conversion site in one place I complained about before and that was it. Aside from that, no new spottings of any sites going up. i am seeing a third panel on a couple of sites and that's about it. I'm not convinced that there has been enough improvement for me to come back yet. Maybe when they get VoLTE going, cuz then they'll have to optimize LTE to fill in every gap to ensure no dropped calls.

 

Hi gusherb,

 

I know I've asked you this before, but to clarify, could you let me know if I'm correct about one of AT&T's bands is getting upgraded to 15x15, but which is it, and is there two or three other frequencies AT&T is using at 10x10? Also, I know AT&T has low-band spectrum which I like a lot, as I'm pretty sure it is what helped my Cricket experience work so well in my basement, but is their low-band a 5x5, 10x10, etc.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Service hasn't deteriorated for me. Ran a speed test after work yesterday.

 

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

I'm also in Houston and have a line with both Sprint and T-Mobile.  I've run into many places where I'm getting sub 1Mb/s download speeds on T-Mobile.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also in Houston and have a line with both Sprint and T-Mobile.  I've run into many places where I'm getting sub 1Mb/s download speeds on T-Mobile.

 

I tried to find some information online regarding T-Mobile's spectrum amounts in Houston, but couldn't. I'll look for a few more minutes to see if I can find anything that would say, because spectrum seems to be an issue for T-Mobile in some areas, particularly where I'm at in Chicago. Sprint doesn't have the spectrum issue T-Mobile has. However, T-Mobile has a denser network. Once Sprint densifies their network, it'll be blazing past the other carriers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi gusherb,

 

I know I've asked you this before, but to clarify, could you let me know if I'm correct about one of AT&T's bands is getting upgraded to 15x15, but which is it, and is there two or three other frequencies AT&T is using at 10x10? Also, I know AT&T has low-band spectrum which I like a lot, as I'm pretty sure it is what helped my Cricket experience work so well in my basement, but is their low-band a 5x5, 10x10, etc.?

Where you are its 10x10 B2, 4, and 17. And band 2 is free to be widened to 15x15. Not sure when but it'll happen at some point, could be tomorrow or 6 months from now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... Still nothing on Houston. I'm looking at this site, which doesn't list Houston, but it lists Chicago, and I have some questions for the technical experts here on S4GRU. Here is the link though before I ask the questions :

 

http://specmap.sequence-omega.net/

 

Alright, I'm looking up the Chicago market for T-Mobile, and this is what is says about the spectrum T-Mobile has here in total :

 

10x10 in the 1710-1720/2110-2120 frequency range

5x5 in the 1740-1745/2140-2145 frequency range

10x10 in the 1745-1755/2145-2155 frequency range

15x15 in the 1895-1910/1975-1990 frequency range

 

So, the first three are AWS, while the last is PCS. In Chicago, 10x10 of the PCS is being used for LTE, while 5x5 of it is being used for HSPA+. That is my understanding of T-Mobile's spectrum usage here in Chicago.

 

It appears from this that there is an additional 10x10 amount T-Mobile could be using for LTE. Is it that amount is being used for GSM/EDGE? Also, is there a way for T-Mobile to take their AWS spectrum and combine it for what appears could be a 25x25 on AWS, if it is able to be combined for one large wide band of AWS spectrum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also in Houston and have a line with both Sprint and T-Mobile.  I've run into many places where I'm getting sub 1Mb/s download speeds on T-Mobile.

 

From one of the maps I found online, it looks as though Houston is a 15x15 AWS, 20x20 PCS market and also has band 12 low-band spectrum, so I would imagine speeds ought to be good there. Unless some of this spectrum is being used for HSPA+, which could be affecting LTE speeds if there isn't enough of that spectrum being used for LTE.

 

T-Mobile really ought to shut down HSPA+, at least in areas where it does not have enough spectrum for both that and LTE, such as in the Chicago market.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PCS still isn't really being used for LTE (outside the 2G-LTE conversion).  They turned it on in NYC but only for large events, and then moved it back to HSPA.  More than likely that is a 15x15 market on AWS LTE only.  If they refarm PCS, it'll be 10x10. 5MHz for GSM and 5MHz for HSPA.  It does seem like TMo might squeeze GSM into guard bands before shutting down HSPA on PCS so that is good.

 

 

If LTE speeds are poor, try forcing HSPA.  Might get some decent speeds.  But I am hoping that 2016 is the year of PCS GSM/HSPA to PCS LTE refarm.  It is becoming quickly apparent in many cities that it is needed now rather than later. 

 

With all their customer adds, data usage is just exploding on their network.  I'm sure BingeOn only decreased total throughput for just a few weeks before the increased usage from customer adds surpassed the pre-BingeOn traffic levels.  lol

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also in Houston and have a line with both Sprint and T-Mobile. I've run into many places where I'm getting sub 1Mb/s download speeds on T-Mobile.

Is it becoming an issue or is it just in some places

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From one of the maps I found online, it looks as though Houston is a 15x15 AWS, 20x20 PCS market and also has band 12 low-band spectrum, so I would imagine speeds ought to be good there. Unless some of this spectrum is being used for HSPA+, which could be affecting LTE speeds if there isn't enough of that spectrum being used for LTE.

 

T-Mobile really ought to shut down HSPA+, at least in areas where it does not have enough spectrum for both that and LTE, such as in the Chicago market.

Im sure tmobile will aggregate houston real soon

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also in Houston and have a line with both Sprint and T-Mobile. I've run into many places where I'm getting sub 1Mb/s download speeds on T-Mobile.

Im sure t mobile will aggregate the bands real soon

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it becoming an issue or is it just in some places

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

 

The network is still very usable overall and there's great speeds in many places.  But it's congested in enough places that makes it noticeable.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

attachicon.gifScreenshot_2016-03-22-17-33-58.png Service hasn't deteriorated for me. Ran a speed test after work yesterday.

Yes, live and performing well.

No issues for me.

 

As always: Ymmv

 

rose-colored-glasses-2.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network is still very usable overall and there's great speeds in many places. But it's congested in enough places that makes it noticeable.

Nice! Im still currently using sprint in a b25 market only. Getting ready to move to Huntsville tx and i checked coverage map and t mobiles covers the 1-45 /i 10 way better then sprint

 

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be about an hour outside of Houston. Huntsville texas

 

Going to prison?  How long is your sentence?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irony at it's finest.

 

Adult fanboys are insufferable.

 

No irony.  I am not even remotely a fanboy.  But that is you to a T.  The T-Mobile fanboy.

 

Tales from Houston, TX...

 

Where all the T-Mobile cell sites are strong, all the T-Mobile LTE signals are good looking, and all the T-Mobile data speeds are above average. 

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...