Jump to content

T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2


lilotimz

Recommended Posts

Anyway you slice it the 600mhz auctions are for tomorrow. Sprint needs solutions for today.

 

Softbank doesn't seem like an organization that enjoys pissing away money. And it seems it has a good track record backing that up.

 

TMO currently has a strong build out plan in action and its working. And they need that 600mhz to finish their vision. The rate of new customers onboarding to magenta is also amazing. But I also don't believe that vision can wait for "tomorrow"....

 

I highly suspect dish will be the magic pill... Question is who will get to take it first.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 


 

 

TMO currently has a strong build out plan in action and its working. And they need that 600mhz to finish their vision. The rate of new customers onboarding to magenta is also amazing. But I also don't believe that vision can wait for "tomorrow"....

 

 

 

 

turning on B4 and B12 where they can get it is hardly a 'vision', and their customer count is closely related to their rock-bottom ARPU. their 'vision' is to be bought out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway you slice it the 600mhz auctions are for tomorrow. Sprint needs solutions for today.

 

Softbank doesn't seem like an organization that enjoys pissing away money. And it seems it has a good track record backing that up.

 

TMO currently has a strong build out plan in action and its working. And they need that 600mhz to finish their vision. The rate of new customers onboarding to magenta is also amazing. But I also don't believe that vision can wait for "tomorrow"....

 

I highly suspect dish will be the magic pill... Question is who will get to take it first.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

 

What kills me is that Sprint has national low band, what SoftBank refers to as "platinum band" in their own country. What's T-Mobile doing with Extended Range LTE? Copying SoftBank marketing in a way. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

turning on B4 and B12 where they can get it is hardly a 'vision', and their customer count is closely related to their rock-bottom ARPU. their 'vision' is to be bought out.

 

 

ABPU is the new hotness. Problem with ARPU is that it doesn't fully account for phone payment plans and leasing. T-Mobile's ABPU is climbing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What kills me is that Sprint has national low band, what SoftBank refers to as "platinum band" in their own country. What's T-Mobile doing with Extended Range LTE? Copying SoftBank marketing in a way.

 

 

T-Mobile also copied Verizon's XLTE with their own "Wideband LTE" This marketing stuff is getting unethical a bit, I think.

 

I don't like how carriers often have their social media teams posting on each others socially media pages, especially on their competitors executive pages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile also copied Verizon's XLTE with their own "Wideband LTE" This marketing stuff is getting unethical a bit, I think.

 

I don't like how carriers often have their social media teams posting on each others socially media pages, especially on their competitors executive pages.

It goes on everywhere so I can't say it's just one company. Who does this guy remind you of?

 

 

That's such a blatant ripoff of our favorite Magentan overlord that it's ridiculous. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It goes on everywhere so I can't say it's just one company. Who does this guy remind you of?

 

 

That's such a blatant ripoff of our favorite Magentan overlord that it's ridiculous. [emoji23][emoji23][emoji23]

That video definitely is a great example of Legere and even how T-Mobile is, the latter to a great extent. Even though T-Mobile doesn't suck in all areas, it still does in many, particularly those areas with Edge. Legere's and T-Mobile's response often basically is "Its okay! We have Extended Range LTE!" Well yeah, covering far less than half of the country using 700mhz, which is a spectrum, not a network technology and has nothing to do with Edge in that regard.

 

Then there are people not happy with other aspects of T-Mobile, both customers and employees who have issues. Yet, Legere and T-Mobile are not really addressing those. Besides the Extended Range LTE stuff, the other point is "Its okay! We have more data capacity per customer than any other carrier!" Yeah, keep on ignoring one of the chief complaints the company has had for several years longer than anyone could honestly blame Sprint for, on any one single thing.

 

Yes, T-Mobile has updated many areas with LTE where Edge was prevalent, but alot of those are being covered by the 700mhz. That still is ignoring many of the areas without 700mhz. Yet, with all of the hype, very similar to in that video, "It's okay, just look at our uncarrier coverage map and try to be good little Magentans by ignoring how carrier-like Verizon style it really is."

 

"Oh, and remember T-Sheeple, with John Legere and Data Strong, you can't go wrong!"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile also copied Verizon's XLTE with their own "Wideband LTE" This marketing stuff is getting unethical a bit, I think.

 

I don't like how carriers often have their social media teams posting on each others socially media pages, especially on their competitors executive pages.

What exactly is unethical about it? It's just a marketing term that the average consume can understand better than the network terms. Verizon used to advertise "EVDO"...but eventually changed to calling it 3G. Because consumers understood 3G better due to the iPhone. Nothing unethical about it, it's just marketing. And it happens in every industry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly is unethical about it? It's just a marketing term that the average consume can understand better than the network terms. Verizon used to advertise "EVDO"...but eventually changed to calling it 3G. Because consumers understood 3G better due to the iPhone. Nothing unethical about it, it's just marketing. And it happens in every industry.

I believe alot of marketing is unethical, though being a part of a corrupt system where so much of it is this way, it doesn't seem so bad as others. Although, I have a very strong view of these things, so I understand how it can be viewed differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know when the 700 MHz A-block build out deadlines for all those licenses?  I am curious if any of those deadlines are coming out where those spectrum squatters will eventually have to sell them to Tmobile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do T-Mobile phones not support Band 5? US Cellular has plenty of places where they have LTE on Band 5 but not Band 12, and the same issue would apply there.

 

- Trip

T-Mobile phones mostly support B5 since that's an LTE band AT&T used in rural applications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then if a phone has to disable B12 if it doesn't support VoLTE, does it also need to disable B5 for the same reason then?  That's the logical leap I'm making here, since a T-Mobile customer roaming on US Cellular could wind up in the same boat while on B5 instead of B12.

 

- Trip

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then if a phone has to disable B12 if it doesn't support VoLTE, does it also need to disable B5 for the same reason then?  That's the logical leap I'm making here, since a T-Mobile customer roaming on US Cellular could wind up in the same boat while on B5 instead of B12.

 

- Trip

 

Yeah, that's a logic flaw in the writer of the link story.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that's a logic flaw in the writer of the link story.

 

That and a number of devices this year on US Cellular and Sprint have been using the same model. That would instantly negate his whole thing about T-Mobile and US Cellular being a better match simply because of Band 12.

 

The more we read into it, the less it makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That and a number of devices this year on US Cellular and Sprint have been using the same model. That would instantly negate his whole thing about T-Mobile and US Cellular being a better match simply because of Band 12.

 

The more we read into it, the less it makes sense.

Only just a few (Moto X PE and Moto E comes to mind). USCC has always ordered unique devices for themselves that may or may not have Band 25. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only just a few (Moto X PE and Moto E comes to mind). USCC has always ordered unique devices for themselves that may or may not have Band 25. 

 

The GS6 and S6 Edge+ have Band 25. The LG G4 has Band 25. The iPhone 6, 6+ 6s, and 6s+ offer support for all of Sprint's bands. It was wrong for me to say the same model, but it seems like most of the more popular phones released in the last 12 months have, at the very least, support for Band 25.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So then if a phone has to disable B12 if it doesn't support VoLTE, does it also need to disable B5 for the same reason then?  That's the logical leap I'm making here, since a T-Mobile customer roaming on US Cellular could wind up in the same boat while on B5 instead of B12.

 

- Trip

 

My guess is that T-Mobile isn't running into those issues with B5 yet because they don't have any CCA roaming online yet. It will be interesting to see if B5 gets disabled on handsets unwilling to incorporate VoLTE. 

 

It's mostly cheap handsets with stock Android that aren't incorporating VoLTE. T-Mobile's implementation of VoLTE is mostly standardized. Not a whole lot of proprietary things incorporated into it IIRC. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

US Cellular would certainly explain T-Mobile's "EOY 2015" maps. Western Maryland specifically...I have family there. Neither Sprint, Verizon, or T-Mobile have native service. But US Cellular does.

If they are using US Cellular coverage in their maps how come Nebraska and Iowa aren't covered? US Cell covers both states well.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they are using US Cellular coverage in their maps how come Nebraska and Iowa aren't covered? US Cell covers both states well.

 

To explain Iowa, T-Mobile cannot undercut Iowa Wireless Services aka i Wireless.  No doubt, that would be a contractual violation -- much like Sprint faced with its affiliates when it merged with Nextel.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maine, parts of New Hampshire, Outer Banks, NC are covered well by US Cellular but not represented in T-mobile's map prediction. Are there affiliates for T-mobile there too?

 

PS. I would be super bummed if USSC chose T-mobile for LTE roaming since Sprint has been the most aggressive in courting CCA partners and adding B12 to thier phone repertoire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maine, parts of New Hampshire, Outer Banks, NC are covered well by US Cellular but not represented in T-mobile's map prediction. Are there affiliates for T-mobile there too?

 

PS. I would be super bummed if USSC chose T-mobile for LTE roaming since Sprint has been the most aggressive in courting CCA partners and adding B12 to thier phone repertoire.

 

US Cellular is capable of working with more than one carrier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

T-Mobile could have up to $10B for 600Mhz auction... http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-cfo-600-mhz-incentive-auction-dynamics-are-positive-carrier-could/2015-09-30

 

They plan to bid to complete their low band portfolio to have a nationwide low band combined of 600 and 700. Then they would like to buy 600 in metro areas to supplement their spectrum portfolio in those areas (more capacity). Also some hints that merger/acquisition news coming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...