Jump to content
EvanA

Nokia moves to purchase Alcatel-Lucent

Recommended Posts

Will be troubling times for existing Alcatel-Lucent markets in the short term but an exciting time for the future as the weakest NV vendor regions get cannibalized by Samsung, Ericson, and Nokia.

 

Lots of question marks will be have have over the existing deployments from both Nokia and alu territory.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will be troubling times for existing Alcatel-Lucent markets in the short term but an exciting time for the future as the weakest NV vendor regions get cannibalized by Samsung, Ericson, and Nokia.

 

Lots of question marks will be have have over the existing deployments from both Nokia and alu territory.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

:td:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not so sure how I feel about this right now.  I mean Nokia seems to be doing pretty well with its network equipment but I just don't know how much impact this has on LTE deployment especially in markets that use their equipment for B25/B26/B41 LTE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Saw this trending on Twitter yesterday. Will be an interesting ride to see as how everything will go down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this is a bad thing. Did another source indicate they were immediately shutting down equipment manufacturing for the Alcatel side of the house? My assumption (while probably incorrect) is that nothing will change in the near term other than AP/AR header information saying Nokia now instead of Alcatel - and the back office updates to make that happen. Did I miss something that indicated Alcatel was going to be effectively shut down?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not so sure how I feel about this right now.  I mean Nokia seems to be doing pretty well with its network equipment but I just don't know how much impact this has on LTE deployment especially in markets that use their equipment for B25/B26/B41 LTE.

 

I don't imagine it would have any impact in the short term. Legacy equipment will remain for as long as they are in their useful lives. I imagine that interoperability between ALU and Nokia equipment will be improved over time.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand why this is a bad thing. Did another source indicate they were immediately shutting down equipment manufacturing for the Alcatel side of the house? My assumption (while probably incorrect) is that nothing will change in the near term other than AP/AR header information saying Nokia now instead of Alcatel - and the back office updates to make that happen. Did I miss something that indicated Alcatel was going to be effectively shut down?

I seriously doubt that. Also they can't just shutdown equipment, they deployed it and it is run by whomever and ALU simply supports it. Sprint could ALU equipment forever as long as they keep paying for support. It will be ALU equipment regardless of who owns them, its just who you call for support that will change.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes me wonder if we'll ever see NEC in the US to keep the competition up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe when there's a 5grollout this will matter more. Since the deal doesn't close till 2016.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt it be better for output? 2x the people making the same thing, rather than 2 different pieces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt it be better for output? 2x the people making the same thing, rather than 2 different pieces.

These mergers rarely come without layoffs, especially when major overlap in products/services exists.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://online.barrons.com/articles/sprint-may-have-spurred-nokia-alcatel-lucent-deal-1429282538

 

 

Speculation of a Nokia-Alcatel-Lucent wireless-asset merger first surfaced about one and a half years ago but receded. We think the latest round of talks was spurred on by Sprint ( S)which wanted to see the wireless assets combine so that it could rely on the new entity as its primary or even sole wireless equipment vendor going forward. 

 

Interesting speculation

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I have heard internal rumors that Sprint (via Masa) was considering a move to just two network vendors from here forward.  For a good year or so.  Dumping Ericsson.  But not feeling good about ALU as the only other partner with Samsung.  But going to two vendors with Samsung and Nokia (via an ALU buyout) may not be so bad.  So Sprint being part of the catalyst for this marriage is plausible when put into context with the rumors I've heard.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have heard internal rumors that Sprint (via Masa) was considering a move to just two network vendors from here forward. For a good year or so. Dumping Ericsson. But not feeling good about ALU as the only other partner with Samsung. But going to two vendors with Samsung and Nokia (via an ALU buyout) may not be so bad. So Sprint being part of the catalyst for this marriage is plausible when put into context with the rumors I've heard.

The cdma portfolio from Alcatel-Lucent may be all that Nokia needs. Their cdma offerings are far inferior as it currently exists.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe when there's a 5grollout this will matter more. Since the deal doesn't close till 2016.

 

Someone already grab s5gru.com !!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

The transaction is expected to close in the first half of 2016.

 

Faster Nokia, faster!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

s6gru.com is still open!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

s6gru.com is still open!

 

Let the sex guru jokes commence...

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • There are those who see technology as magic and then there are those of us who see it as science and try to understand the how and why it works. Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
    • On recent versions of Android, you are not likely to see it update every second except for in specific scenarios, but I'm glad it's updating regularly for you! For the benefit of whoever is interested.. signal updates from the OS are likely to be more frequent (but not guaranteed) if your device is moving fairly quickly (ie in a vehicle), and you are actively transferring data over the mobile network. When the connection is idle (including when you are using another connection method, like Wi-Fi), some things are not updated as frequently. Android does not publicly state anything much more specific than that. In reality, the signal strength is constantly changing, every millisecond, faster than the screen can even update.. but there's no reason for any mobile device to monitor it that intensely, the CPU and power impacts would be crazy. An overwhelming majority of mobile users don't even need it updating even every 10 seconds. As of last year, over 314 million Americans had mobile phones.. with some quick math, SCP is on less than 0.0032% of them 😆
    • I got frustrated enough to go to the nuclear option. Full factory reset and did not restore from a backup. SCP is now refreshing every 5 to 10 seconds, not quite the every second I prefer but still much more usable than when it takes several minutes. I wish I could identify specifically what is causing this. I don't think it is intended behavior if it is indeed the result of power management. Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk
    • That's no fun. Unfortunately it sounds like something with your device? I don't have any control over the speed at which the OS provides data updates.. the OS tries to balance power usage with the likelihood of changed data being available, and I can't do anything to force it to refresh any faster. Even if I put a manual "refresh" button to re-query the API (as many people have asked for), it would simply show the same data already present. SCP automatically refreshes the screen when the OS reports there is new data.
    • If there are two stores close to each other, the one that has more traffic will stay open. The other will close and those people will be searching for new jobs. 
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...