Jump to content

S4GRU Make-Over?


nmartine3

Recommended Posts

So, what does everyone think of the new look?

 

Personally, I think it looks excellent, very Sprint-esque, and it looks like a new website, with momentum to push it further.

 

Let's get a discussion going here.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what does everyone think of the new look?

 

The makeover is not complete.  S4GRU still needs exfoliation, eyebrow waxing, and maybe some Botox.  Also, photograph S4GRU only on its good side.

 

AJ

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The makeover is not complete. S4GRU still needs exfoliation, eyebrow waxing, and maybe some Botox. Also, photograph S4GRU only on its good side.

 

AJ

Will the carpet match the drapes?

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will the carpet match the drapes?

 

Brazilian wax.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The yellows that highlight forums/threads with new content hurt my eyes.  Too contrasty or not contrasty enough or something.  I like the individual thread look, but not the forum view.  Text is easier to read off a white background. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely done. I like the color contrast to highlight unread threads!

 

Now, can you please fix Tapatalk?!? [emoji38]

It's always been there. I just boosted up the color a little. As for Tapatalk...

 

Using Moto X² on Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I'm using a Blackberry, I'm not worrying about tapatalk, though I could load it up. I'm on 10.3.1 that I loaded up. As for the sight, I like it. By the way, this looks good on the Spartan browser too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The T4GRU site is nice as well, everyone should check that out. I'm glad these site exist, thank you Robert, and rest of the staff.  :tu:  :thx:  :frantic:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...