Jump to content
Ascertion

Sprint Q4 2014 earnings report

Recommended Posts

But it's not the govts. problem. It's the ceo's. Remember back to when the tmo/att merger was slapped down. TMO was in WAAAAAY worse position than now and maybe even worse than sprint and look where it is now. Sure profits aren't there but they're growing.

 

Also remember that CEOs WILL lie to get a merger past FCC.

 

Look at the att tmo merger. Att offered $39bil for TMO "to expand lte from 250 to 300 mil" yet this

http://www.broadbandreports.com/r0/download/1678331~018ee90413e657e412818181a5d840ff/DOC.pdf

 

accidentally leaked document shows that going from 250 to 300 mil lte would cost att $3.9bil i.e. 90% cheaper than buying tmobile.

 

I don't believe

 

And one could make the debate that the only reason T-Mo even got to the place they are now was their windfall from the failed merger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And one could make the debate that the only reason T-Mo even got to the place they are now was their windfall from the failed merger.

"Spectrum windfall + cash + MetroPCS" was a big part of their turnaround. Areas with no Metro like Chicago, Indy, NOLA, Louisville, Cincinnati, and most rurals are a little rougher spectrum wise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4e695f491df2ed203c7c301aeb63104c.jpg

 

More shots fired, see the Magenta line?

 

From the conference call transcript:

 

This improvement was further validated by independent third party data provided by Nielsen, which showed that Sprint's drop call rate has been the lowest ever and improved by more than 50% year-over-year. You can probably guess from the carrier -- from the graph which carries continue to have the worst drop call rate in the industry.

Sprint's (S) CEO Marcelo Claure on Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript $S

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/2889416

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4e695f491df2ed203c7c301aeb63104c.jpg

 

More shots fired, see the Magenta line?

 

From the conference call transcript:

 

 

Sprint's (S) CEO Marcelo Claure on Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript $S

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/2889416

Tmobile is only carrier that doesn't have lowband 2g/3G voice spectrum. It's not level playing field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tmobile is only carrier that doesn't have lowband 2g/3G voice spectrum. It's not level playing field.

Excuses! :lol:

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And one could make the debate that the only reason T-Mo even got to the place they are now was their windfall from the failed merger. 

 

Imagine the landscape if AT&T never persued TMobile.  Tmobile would've been grasping at the straws.  The duopoly would be unbreakable.

 

it was a good thing for consumers that Tmobile got all that windfall.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tmobile is only carrier that doesn't have lowband 2g/3G voice spectrum. It's not level playing field.

 

I don't buy that. Sprint had PCS only for a long period of time and still managed to have less dropped and blocked calls than T-Mobile the whole time with the exception of 2013 and early 2014.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tmobile is only carrier that doesn't have lowband 2g/3G voice spectrum. It's not level playing field.

 

Sorry but you did not answer in the form of a question. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tmobile is only carrier that doesn't have lowband 2g/3G voice spectrum. It's not level playing field.

Sorry but you did not answer in the form of a question. 

 

You win the Internets today.  maximus is slayed in The Forums at S4GRU.

 

AJ

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4e695f491df2ed203c7c301aeb63104c.jpg

 

More shots fired, see the Magenta line?

 

From the conference call transcript:

 

 

Sprint's (S) CEO Marcelo Claure on Q3 2014 Results - Earnings Call Transcript $S

http://www.seekingalpha.com/article/2889416

They didn't deploy 800Mhz voice nationwide.  It's not available anywhere in Cleveland.

 

Everything else I agree with and I'm excited about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They didn't deploy 800Mhz voice nationwide. It's not available anywhere in Cleveland.

 

Everything else I agree with and I'm excited about.

img_canadamap.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They didn't deploy 800Mhz voice nationwide. It's not available anywhere in Cleveland.

 

Everything else I agree with and I'm excited about.

It'd be nice for him to articulate what the status of ibez is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They didn't deploy 800Mhz voice nationwide. It's not available anywhere in Cleveland.

I believe it is in Cleveland. Why do you say it is not?

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it is in Cleveland. Why do you say it is not?

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

No. Check the nv sites complete map

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No. Check the nv sites complete map

Gotcha, I thought that IBEZ issue only effected 800 LTE, not 800 voice.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It'd be nice for him to articulate what the status of ibez is.

 

That was addressed specifically today in the call.

 

"Our second focus area for the network is a continued build out of LTE on the 800MHz band.  We have 800MHz LTE on air across more than 60% of our LTE footprint and we are focused on completing the other 40% by the end of this year when rebanding is complete."

 

It will happen some time this year.  Soon enough that they can largely complete B26 deployment in the IBEZ by year's end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Our second focus area for the network is a continued build out of LTE on the 800MHz band.  We have 800MHz LTE on air across more than 60% of our LTE footprint and we are focused on completing the other 40% by the end of this year when rebanding is complete."

 

 

Its sometimes hard for me to hear through Marcelo's accent but I'm pretty sure he said "completing the other 40% by the end of the year WHERE rebanding is complete."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was addressed specifically today in the call.

 

 

It will happen some time this year. Soon enough that they can largely complete B26 deployment in the IBEZ by year's end.

But is rebanding same thing as ibez?

Maybe he's only talking about the public safety rebanding like in Miami.

Idk. You know more.

 

Gotcha, I thought that IBEZ issue only effected 800 LTE, not 800 voice.

 

Sent from my LGLS990 using Tapatalk

It depends how much spectrum on the other side of the border is rebranded.

In some areas NOT in ibez, I've read here that sprint has launched 1x800 first because that only takes 1.25fdd and then waiting for more public safety to be cleared before adding 800lte 5fdd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canada IBEZ can get launched this year because Mike is really close to shut down. No mentions of Mike even exist on the Telus website.

 

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_%28cellular_network%29

 

Also see http://www.howardforums.com/showthread.php/1856468-Mike-is-retiring for the date - January 29, 2016. My guess is that a lot of the spectrum is already available.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canada IBEZ can get launched this year because Mike is really close to shut down. No mentions of Mike even exist on the Telus website.

 

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_%28cellular_network%29

 

Fully rebanding on the canuck side wont happen till late this year or early next year  which will allocate enough for 5x5 LTE 800 + 1x800. Full rebanding in the southern border will happen late this year and well into next year for 3x3 LTE 800 + 1x800.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fully rebanding on the canuck side wont happen till late this year or early next year which will allocate enough for 5x5 LTE 800 + 1x800. Full rebanding in the southern border will happen late this year and well into next year for 3x3 LTE 800 + 1x800.

Is it possible to forego the 1x800, and do 4.25x4.25 LTE 800?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fully rebanding on the canuck side wont happen till late this year or early next year which will allocate enough for 5x5 LTE 800 + 1x800. Full rebanding in the southern border will happen late this year and well into next year for 3x3 LTE 800 + 1x800.

See the edit with a lengthy letter from a Telus VP that explains their network transition from IDEN to 4G PTT services. That explains a lot more of this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to forego the 1x800, and do 4.25x4.25 LTE 800?

 

No.  A 5 MHz FDD carrier requires at least 4.5 MHz FDD.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it possible to forego the 1x800, and do 4.25x4.25 LTE 800?

Did you mean deploy a 3mhz LTE carrier, and another 1.4mhz LTE carrier? Or deploy 3mhz LTE and a 1.25mhz CDMA carrier?

 

Sent from my SM-T217S using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fully rebanding on the canuck side wont happen till late this year or early next year  which will allocate enough for 5x5 LTE 800 + 1x800. Full rebanding in the southern border will happen late this year and well into next year for 3x3 LTE 800 + 1x800.

I thought they would have 5.5x5.5 along the southern border?

So they could do 3x3 LTE and 1x800 or 5x5 LTE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • When they turn off the band 41 backhaul then Maybe I will hook it up to my home network. Meanwhile it will stay on it. Hopefully T-Mobile optimizes their network to pick the best connection instead of switching to T-Mobile when the Sprint network has no service as it does now. 
    • Does your android allow you to connect to wifi and mobile ? By default my android cuts the mobile when I'm on wifi to save data so you need to make sure both can be on at the same time.
    • By the time you get your S20, it'll probably be preloaded with the update that defaults you to T-Mobile bands. Interestingly enough, the IP network part of the connection is still Sprint...but you get VoLTE across the board. With that said, you can install Samsung Band Selection and pick which combination of bands (LTE and NR, though n71 will only work if you also have B2/66 enabled as well, and n41 for the most part doesn't exist) you'll let your phone on. T-Mobile band priority still applies to whatever you let through, so if you accept B2/4/66 you'll get those (probably even 12/71) but if you lock your phone down to Sprint bands that's what you'll get. As an example, I've tended to select B41-only on my S20 if I'm in an area I know to have solid B41 (AKA where I live and nearby). That gets me significantly higher speeds than the default, which tends to sit on B66+n71. I got one roaming warning from this but latency and speeds are as if I was on the native network. Then if I head out I'll either turn everything on or select 25/26/41 as the radio in this phone is strong enough to sustain a Zoom video call where previously (Essential Phone) the only thing reliable was 1x. The system isn't perfect, and sometime the phone will fail to lock on a signal at all after enough band selection changes, but a reboot fixes that. I have the band selection app as one of my quick apps on the screen edge app selector, so swapping things around takes maybe 15 seconds and a few taps.
    • It works now. It can take up to 3 weeks to enable it though after changing over, but usually it's within a week. It used to be a fully manually process, with someone having to turn it on, but it seems more automated now. You will lose VoLTE if your internet cuts out. Used take a few days to get it back (again, maybe a manual process?). But when I tested this weekend I got it back within an hour. Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    • You can email the developers and ask for an enthusiast's license. Usually good for 6 months at a time.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...