Jump to content

Marcelo posts on LinkedIn

P_M_G

By P_M_G
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

Vince Member Level: 4G LTE

Vince

Posted
Posted

Ironically, they retained the naming rights to "the Cell." Hopefully after that deal expires, it'll go back to its proper name, Comiskey Park.

We shall find out in 2023. That naming deal couldn't possibly be renewed with zero cellular presence in Chicago, could it?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gnoj Member Level: eHRPD

gnoj

Posted
Posted

We shall find out in 2023. That naming deal couldn't possibly be renewed with zero cellular presence in Chicago, could it?

It could be renewed, sure, but I don't see the point, so I doubt they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Ironically, they retained the naming rights to "the Cell." Hopefully after that deal expires, it'll go back to its proper name, Comiskey Park.

We shall find out in 2023. That naming deal couldn't possibly be renewed with zero cellular presence in Chicago, could it?

 

Well, it is the South Side of Chicago.  So, maybe the stadium could just be marginally renamed "The Jail Cell."

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
P_M_G Member Level: 3G EVDO

P_M_G

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, it is the South Side of Chicago.  So, maybe the stadium could just be marginally renamed "The Jail Cell."

 

:P

 

AJ

 

It's the baddest part of town

And if you go down there you better just beware

of a man named Leroy Brown

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

It's the baddest part of town

And if you go down there you better just beware

of a man named Leroy Brown

 

Yeah, I am scared.  Leroy Brown is a bad, bad song.

 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MarshieZ Member Level: eHRPD

MarshieZ

Posted
Posted

We shall find out in 2023. That naming deal couldn't possibly be renewed with zero cellular presence in Chicago, could it?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

 

I'm all for looking forward and planning for the future... but I don't even want to think that far ahead... yet.

 

In 2023 I'll be 29!  :blink:

 

However... I'm very intrigued by not only what the wireless industry but the whole world will be like in 5-10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • AirlineFlyer
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By AirlineFlyer · Posted

      Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Nissan Skyline
    • dkyeager
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...