Jump to content

AT&T now the second slowest network in US

payturr

By payturr
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

AT&T is still not a bad network, they are still not done with LTE deployment, sometimes there 3G "HSPA +" is faster then there LTE. I have friends who have T-mobile and they still get 2G EDGE out side city limits LOL and I think I remember seeing somewhere saying T-mobile will have LTE on ALL there 2G EDGE sites by the end of 2014, its almost the end of 2014.... I maybe I didnt read that right or I might be wrong. Regardless ALL the carriers have there good and bad spots, no one carrier is THE BEST and PERFECT, Just saying!!  :)

 

 

All very true.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

I like my LTE network signal strong -- but not like "eww!" strong.   AJ

S4GRU
S4GRU

But AT&T has the strongest LTE network.  More bars in more places.  I just saw Frank and Charlie on TV last night during the football game.      Watch the comments all be about Sprint, and not A

WiWavelength
WiWavelength

If so, they should build an elaborate treehouse and be the South Dakota Family Robert-son -- the only family on Sprint within hundreds of miles.   AJ

payturr Member Level: eHRPD

payturr

Posted
  • Author
Posted

AT&T is still not a bad network, they are still not done with LTE deployment, sometimes there 3G "HSPA +" is faster then there LTE. I have friends who have T-mobile and they still get 2G EDGE out side city limits LOL and I think I remember seeing somewhere saying T-mobile will have LTE on ALL there 2G EDGE sites by the end of 2014, its almost the end of 2014.... I maybe I didnt read that right or I might be wrong. Regardless ALL the carriers have there good and bad spots, no one carrier is THE BEST and PERFECT, Just saying!!  :)

Of course! This is expected with the concept of a nationwide network connecting millions of people, it's just the fact they're second slowest as of right now, and Sprint is well on the way to overthrow them ;) It's all about our carrier moving up!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
gusherb Member Level: eHRPD

gusherb

Posted
Posted

AT&T hasn't been consistent around here since I was using a GSM-only Nokia flip phone. Even then, that went wonky around 2008.

The only 10x10 I know of in Chicago is on B17, B4 is 5x5 and I think B2 is as well. Being dumped onto a loaded up 5x5 B4 carrier like that then going a block away and being on 10x10 B17 makes for a roller-coaster-ride experience. Now I think B17 is overloading in some places like where my friend lives, she complained of terrible lag so I talked her through the various engineering screens of her GS3 thinking she was stuck on weak B4 only to see that it was reasonably strong B17 with very low SNR. I then instructed her how to switch the phone down to "4G" and she hasn't complained since.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
utiz4321 Member Level: 4G WiMax

utiz4321

Posted
Posted

But AT&T has the strongest LTE network. More bars in more places. I just saw Frank and Charlie on TV last night during the football game. :roflmao:

 

Watch the comments all be about Sprint, and not AT&T. :lol:

Yeah, I am supper disappoint in the nations strongest network branding. I mean, what does that mean?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I am supper disappoint...

 

Robert knows all too well "supper disappoint."  It makes him a sad panda.  Hungry, too.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
milan03 Member Level: eHRPD

milan03

Posted
Posted

But AT&T has the strongest LTE network.  More bars in more places.  I just saw Frank and Charlie on TV last night during the football game.   :roflmao:

 

Watch the comments all be about Sprint, and not AT&T.   :lol:

It's even worse... "Strongest LTE Signal". Yes that is all they've got for their new slogan. And a "power" chart. Wow.  :o  http://www.att.com/network/en/index.html

 

4UNF3KCl.png

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jamisonshaw125 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jamisonshaw125

Posted
Posted

There's a flaw in RootMetrics where when I report my signal on my S4 it reports as -120dbm no matter the strength of the LTE signal. I wonder if some of Sprint samples are polluted or other phones reporting - 120 dBm when on LTE on Sprint.

Email them!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ascertion Member Level: LTE Advanced

Ascertion

Posted
Posted

There's a flaw in RootMetrics where when I report my signal on my S4 it reports as -120dbm no matter the strength of the LTE signal. I wonder if some of Sprint samples are polluted or other phones reporting - 120 dBm when on LTE on Sprint.

It's because it measures your 1x signal which isn't displayed during LTE on triband due to lack dual path radios.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tampaflusa Member Level: eHRPD

tampaflusa

Posted
Posted

It's because it measures your 1x signal which isn't displayed during LTE on triband due to lack dual path radios.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

I figured that, but when Root Metrics reports, it reports it as a LTE signal. I noticed signal strength average in my area is being affected, overall the average is getting weaker.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
milan03 Member Level: eHRPD

milan03

Posted
Posted

I figured that, but when Root Metrics reports, it reports it as a LTE signal. I noticed signal strength average in my area is being affected, overall the average is getting weaker.

If you like your LTE signal, and if you like it "strong", look no further! The power chart is all you need to know!   :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I have the same issue on AT&T with Root Metrics on my Nexus 5.  It's a single transmission path on Sprint, AT&T and Tmo.  So on all their networks when on LTE, it reports incorrectly the voice signal strength.  This will be true on all single path transmission devices, regardless of provider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Conan Kudo Member Level: eHRPD

Conan Kudo

Posted
Posted

AT&T is still not a bad network, they are still not done with LTE deployment, sometimes there 3G "HSPA +" is faster then there LTE. I have friends who have T-mobile and they still get 2G EDGE out side city limits LOL and I think I remember seeing somewhere saying T-mobile will have LTE on ALL there 2G EDGE sites by the end of 2014, its almost the end of 2014.... I maybe I didnt read that right or I might be wrong. Regardless ALL the carriers have there good and bad spots, no one carrier is THE BEST and PERFECT, Just saying!!  :)

You make a good point that all carriers have their ugly spots. As for T-Mobile, they moved up their timetable to have their existing footprint fully converted over from the end of 2015 to the end of the first half of 2015. They are planning to finish expansion to offer native 4G service to 300 million people by the end of 2015 (which puts it at the same level as AT&T and Verizon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paynefanbro Member Level: LTE Advanced

Paynefanbro

Posted
Posted

You make a good point that all carriers have their ugly spots. As for T-Mobile, they moved up their timetable to have their existing footprint fully converted over from the end of 2015 to the end of the first half of 2015. They are planning to finish expansion to offer native 4G service to 300 million people by the end of 2015 (which puts it at the same level as AT&T and Verizon).

I'm pretty sure it was always the first half of 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
derrph Member Level: 4G WiMax

derrph

Posted
Posted

Hmm, you're right. I mis-remembered it. I stand corrected. However, they did add the coverage expansion program in Q3.

Wow I never knew that they were expanding their coverage.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites
derrph Member Level: 4G WiMax

derrph

Posted
Posted

Does sprint have any plans of expanding their footprint past what they already have now?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites
derrph Member Level: 4G WiMax

derrph

Posted
Posted

As far as we know, the only expansion planned is coverage from the RRPP.

Oh the roaming agreement with the smaller carriers. Will that be considered native coverage or roaming?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • Dkoellerwx
      T-Mobile LTE & Network Discussion V2

      By Dkoellerwx · Posted

      At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • AirlineFlyer
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By AirlineFlyer · Posted

      Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Nissan Skyline
    • dkyeager
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...