Jump to content

HTC EVO 4G LTE


P_M_G

Recommended Posts

If we purchased this phone now' date=' and because Sprint does not have LTE yet, will we be able to roam on Verizon LTE?

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2[/quote']

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

At the rate they are deploying they seem to be much faster than VZ...right? Nation coverage in under 2yrs...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

At the rate they are deploying they seem to be much faster than VZ...right? Nation coverage in under 2yrs...

 

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2

 

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

I can attest to that. Coverage is "seamless" in St. Cloud but I am lucky to break -85bdm. I went to Minneapolis, and I was getting between -60 to -85bdm.

 

I am currently getting -117dbm LTE in my living room. Poor

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can attest to that. Coverage is "seamless" in St. Cloud but I am lucky to break -85bdm. I went to Minneapolis, and I was getting between -60 to -85bdm.

 

I am currently getting -117dbm LTE in my living room. Poor

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

-117? Do you even have usable data at that low of signal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Wow. Surprising. Upload isn't very good though.

 

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep. LOL This is at -121

 

That is probably not RSSI but RSRP (or another LTE specific signal strength measure). If RSRP, one conversion factor that I have encountered is to add 14 dB.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. But what would WiMax give at this signal? It's no wonder LTE won out over WiMax.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

Lately in Visalia, I can barely pull those speeds with almost max WiMax signal strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

 

Right. Clearwire is not even close to representative of what WiMax is capable of.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. Clearwire is not even close to representative of what WiMax is capable of.

 

The fair comparison would be in equivalent spectrum (both in propagation and in bandwidth). And 10 MHz x 10 MHz of Upper 700 MHz spectrum is certainly not equivalent to 10 MHz (or even 5 MHz) of BRS/EBS 2600 MHz spectrum.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scott, come on -- that is not even a remotely relevant comparison. Honestly, you should know better than that.

 

AJ

 

Completely agree...put WiMax on 700MHz at same bandwidth and see what happens....

Clearwire just put a foul taste on the whole standard as they were one of the only ones using it, and on that spectrum and the way the deployment went, it can't compare to what VZ has done on 700MHz...which is what the reg consumer sees...

 

 

BUT in Scott's defense it was like 3am when he posted that, and we all know he likely knows this anyway....imho posts at those hours anything is possible. lol :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not certain the rate VZW deployed. But given that VZW is putting 700 LTE on much less total sites, Sprints deployment rate is unprecedented in wireless history as far as I can recall.

 

VZW did not install 700 LTE at every site in the markets they have deployed. They just deployed enough for seamless coverage based on 700 propagation. They are then going back and adding more in existing markets for more capacity after initial launch.

 

So even though VZW LTE deployment had been fast, that has to be kept in mind. Sprint, even if it rolls out slightly slower than VZW, will actually be much more impressive because Sprint's scope of work is so much greater.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

YES!!!

 

And I'm just thinking about it in simple market terms...Sprint will have LTE covered everywhere roughly that currently gets Sprint CDMA service(omitting the areas that have other providers like in west Kansas) right now within a 2yr deployment...Verizon seems to be taking longer to do theres...On top of that I'm still surprised that they are using little dots to mark LTE areas instead of a blanket coverage shaded map...

 

By 2013 end it will be interesting to see the marketing ploy Sprint goes with...ESP if VZ is still deploying its LTE then and not fully covered its service area...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sprint does have LTE on over 350 sites and adding every day.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

 

Sprint already has lte? not where I live in NJ.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to know it's a solid device. And you are lucky you got to play with it at the HTC/Sprint event.

 

Yep, and a lot of good feedback from the crowds. Everyone who used it liked it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint already has lte? not where I live in NJ.

 

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

 

Sprint sure does have LTE live in many areas now!!! :)

 

 

Welcome to the site btw!

 

Take a few min to read the section here to learn some more:

http://s4gru.com/ind...lte-deployment/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

South Jersey is not in the first two rounds of NV deployment. But Central and North Jersey and Philly are.

 

We keep maps of completed NV/LTE sites in our Sponsor section. We are just starting to create LTE coverage maps in our Premier Sponsor section.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YES!!!

 

And I'm just thinking about it in simple market terms...Sprint will have LTE covered everywhere roughly that currently gets Sprint CDMA service(omitting the areas that have other providers like in west Kansas) right now within a 2yr deployment...Verizon seems to be taking longer to do theres...On top of that I'm still surprised that they are using little dots to mark LTE areas instead of a blanket coverage shaded map...

 

By 2013 end it will be interesting to see the marketing ploy Sprint goes with...ESP if VZ is still deploying its LTE then and not fully covered its service area...

 

Yes it will be interesting to see what Verizon will say when they are still lighting up new LTE areas when Sprint finishes. I'm sure that will hurt their stockholder confidence in some way that a carrier less than half their size one upped them! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...