Jump to content

600 MHz auction results posted and transition schedule


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Wow, T-Mobile really went for it.  They've got 15x15 or 20x20 in all Michigan markets.

 

Has anyone created a legend of who the random names were buying for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this on Fierce Wireless...

 

T-Mobile License (T-Mobile)
$7,993,361,993
ParkerB.com Wireless (Dish Network)
$6,211,154,496
CC Wireless Investment (Comcast)
$1,724,877,376
AT&T Spectrum Holdings (AT&T)
$910,202,302
Channel 51 License Co (Channel 51)
$858,704,549
Bluewater Wireless II (Northwood Ventures)
$568,323,225
U.S. Cellular
$328,661,977
NewLevel
$296,546,456
TStar 600 (Northwood Ventures)
$131,317,432
Omega Wireless
$99,737,940
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updated OP post to include more information about the 600 MHz FCC transition Phase schedule and how to determine which Phase(s) your home market is currently allocated to in order to determine the timeline of when the 600 MHz channels are expected to be cleared.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found this on Fierce Wireless...

 

 

 

T-Mobile License (T-Mobile)

 

 

 

$7,993,361,993

 

ParkerB.com Wireless (Dish Network)

 

 

 

$6,211,154,496

 

 

Compared to what T-Mobile won and how much they paid, Dish got taken for a ride. They overpaid for Nationwide 5x5 and the only place they got more spectrum than T-Mobile is in New York and the Bay Area. For a $2 Billion difference, I would have sacrificed NYC and SF-OAK-SJ for equal or more spectrum in the rest of the US markets and rural 20x20 spectrum. Edited by greenbastard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared to what T-Mobile won and how much they paid, Dish got taken for a ride. They overpaid for Nationwide 5x5 and the only place they got more spectrum than T-Mobile is in New York and the Bay Area. For a $2 Billion difference, I would have sacrificed NYC and SF-OAK-SJ for equal or more spectrum in the rest of the US markets and rural 20x20 spectrum.

They went whole hog on NYC and that is almost a third of their outlay.  Looking at the spreadsheet, looks like they got a lot of 10x10 too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Compared to what T-Mobile won and how much they paid, Dish got taken for a ride. They overpaid for Nationwide 5x5 and the only place they got more spectrum than T-Mobile is in New York and the Bay Area. For a $2 Billion difference, I would have sacrificed NYC and SF-OAK-SJ for equal or more spectrum in the rest of the US markets and rural 20x20 spectrum.

 

I am not sure what Dish's thinking was there in trying to focus on SF and NYC markets.  What is Dish's footprint for service?  Is it nationwide?  Either way Dish still looks pretty ripe IMO for Tmobile to scoop them up to add more spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure what Dish's thinking was there in trying to focus on SF and NYC markets. What is Dish's footprint for service? Is it nationwide? Either way Dish still looks pretty ripe IMO for Tmobile to scoop them up to add more spectrum.

I hope you are right with T-Mobile getting Dish. I'm fully in support of this happening, and it'll be a great deal for T-Mobile customers, especially in the boosting of the 600mhz spectrum to a minimum of 15x15 in most places, with many areas going up to 20x20. Having Dish will give the Chicago area 20x20, which will be simply amazing for the network here. Although, the current 15x15 should be great too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope you are right with T-Mobile getting Dish. I'm fully in support of this happening, and it'll be a great deal for T-Mobile customers, especially in the boosting of the 600mhz spectrum to a minimum of 15x15 in most places, with many areas going up to 20x20. Having Dish will give the Chicago area 20x20, which will be simply amazing for the network here. Although, the current 15x15 should be great too.

 

I am rooting for the same.  Dish bought 10x10 in the LA/OC/SD regions in California and that would work great alongside the current 15x15 block that Tmobile bought during the 600 MHz auction.  In addition the mid band spectrum in the AWS-3/PCS-H/S-band (B70) will be real useful since Tmobile did not participate much in the AWS-3 auction and is in desperate need of more mid-band spectrum to support LTE/HSPA/GSM operations.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...