Jump to content

So I ran SpeedTest on a newly activated NV tower


Recommended Posts

Sorry to revive a thread that has run its course' date=' but I have an update. Quite a few towers have been upgraded in my area. You can tell right away since the nid and tower id change. Don't expect high speeds on day one however. It seems even if a tower is marked complete the backhaul and/or fiber may not be totally done yet... Does that make sense or am I wrong? As time goes on speeds seem to be increasing around here.[/quote']

 

PM me the Site IDs and I can tell you if the backhaul has been upgraded.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would I go about finding a Site ID, for curiosity?

 

What I was referring to is actually the BSID. You can find it using Netmonitor or CDMA Field Test.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

How would I go about finding a Site ID' date=' for curiosity?[/quote']

 

Go to our Google Interactive Maps and click on the site. The Site ID is shown there.

 

 

What I was referring to is actually the BSID. You can find it using Netmonitor or CDMA Field Test.

 

BSID numbers shown in Field Test and Netmonitor do not come up in Sprint Databases. I need the Sprint Site ID# or Cascade ID. These are shown on our maps.

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Go to our Google Interactive Maps and click on the site. The Site ID is shown there.

 

 

 

BSID numbers shown in Field Test and Netmonitor do not come up in Sprint Databases. I need the Sprint Site ID# or Cascade ID. These are shown on our maps.

 

 

I would have never figured that. Do they just pick a random number for the BSID?

 

I sent you an updated PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have never figured that. Do they just pick a random number for the BSID?

 

I sent you an updated PM.

 

I have no idea. However, here is the info you requested on backhaul:

 

CH03XC430

Backhaul Ready: 4/25/21012 (E)

RRU Install: 3/9/2012 (A)

3G OnAir: 3/30/2012 (E)

4G OnAir: 6/28/2012 (E)

 

CH03XC432

Backhaul Ready: 2/3/21012 (A)

RRU Install: 2/7/2012 (A)

3G OnAir: 4/9/2012 (E)

4G OnAir: 6/14/2012 (E)

 

This document is dated 3/30/2012. A means "actual", E means "estimated." In the first one, the backhaul will not be live until the end of the month. The second one, the backhaul is already ready.

 

Neither one of them had NV 3G live on 3/30. And it appears that only the first one has gone live since then. It seems that for the most part Chicago is running a week behind schedule. It's likely you are still on a legacy signal on the other site, even though the work is underway.

 

If you are running slower speeds on the first site, then that makes sense since the enhanced backhaul is not currently live there. This must be chaos for the subcontractors keeping track of all the sites they have to go back to and hookup new backhaul to when ready. Notice the 4G live dates in Chicago are not until June. :(

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow! I did not realize how much of a discrepency there could be between the 3g going on the air and the backhaul being installed.

 

The variability between dates at different sites is amazing in many instances.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like the perfect place to ask - what's the best PRL for a Sumasung Epic owner like me? I'm looking for the best 3G PRL since WiMax is pretty thin near the house. TIA.

EDIT: Sure WiFi works on my device, but still, need something to improve here.

 

 

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

Im on an EPIC Touch running Stock Rooted EL29 ROM/Kernel but i am trying out different leaked modems.

What i have found is the modems can play with speeds.

Example.

Have a friend with all stock Epic Touch.

Sitting in a meeting last week i grabbed his phone and his and mine side by side.

Were set up the same but i had FC15 modem in mine.

3G speed test was extremely slow, but thats a tower / loading issue.

4G speed test on his was 3.6mb down and mine was 7.2 down.

UP his was 1 up and mine was 1.4 up.

Its not the most scientific test but it did prove to me that different modems can make a difference.

Remember the modem controls all the radios, WiFi, GPS, 3G, 4G. The FC 15 modem also fixed my GPS issue that he still has on his EL29 modem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...