Jump to content

Verizon, T-Mobile spending consistently capex, while-AT&T, Sprint hit bumps


dkyeager

Recommended Posts

This article is so poor on research that it should have not been published.  Unnamed sources?  Jeffries probably quoted a Verizon source on behalf of Sprint.

 

We know that Sprint is spending the resources to get the equipment up and running. Getting the equipment, manpower and other items to make this happen in areas is the issue.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you can't spend the money if the vendors (Nokia Networks & Alcatel-Lucent) does not have the equipment to sell (equipment shortages).  

 

--Also do not just post a link to the article and copy the title. Put some some of your own thoughts and words to start a discussion.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the issue with technical issues on the new 8T8R radios? The article claimed that Sprint had some issues.

 

Not so much technical than sourcing equipment.  China has been a major player in sourcing and using the same equipment as Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well you can't spend the money if the vendors (Nokia Networks & Alcatel-Lucent) does not have the equipment to sell (equipment shortages).  

 

--Also do not just post a link to the article and copy the title. Put some some of your own thoughts and words to start a discussion.  

I thought these equipment shortages were no more? Or at least not as bad as before... The maps that we have seen with the schedules show the exact opposite of this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought these equipment shortages were no more? Or at least not as bad as before... The maps that we have seen with the schedules show the exact opposite of this...

 

Before you had no equipment at all.

 

Now you get a shipment every once in a while that has to be sent to sites that absolutely needs it the most. 

 

The Samsung markets are bustling with activity because they don't have the massive contracts that ALU and NSN have for China Mobile and have free space in their manufacturing facilities to make the radios. 

 

There's a reason Nokia only has a few hundred sites (optimistically a thousand or so) deployed compared to the thousand(s) that Samsung has. 

 

ALU is also having it pretty bad but not as terrible as Nokia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of people that writes these articles are failing to realize that NV 1.0 is substantially complete. Which was the bulk of the work and spending. Now as sprint goes back and activate 800mhz services and 8t8r the cost to upgrade sites are a lot lower since cell sites has the new base station gear which is supposed to save Sprint money anyways being that the equipment is new and modernized.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before you had no equipment at all.

 

Now you get a shipment every once in a while that has to be sent to sites that absolutely needs it the most.

 

The Samsung markets are bustling with activity because they don't have the massive contracts that ALU and NSN have for China Mobile and have free space in their manufacturing facilities to make the radios.

 

There's a reason Nokia only has a few hundred sites (optimistically a thousand or so) deployed compared to the thousand(s) that Samsung has.

 

ALU is also having it pretty bad but not as terrible as Nokia.

Ugh. Hopefully this isn't for long, but getting problem markets covered first are most important. NSN better start putting their factories on turbo charge. Masa should lend them a couple hundred million or so to get the show on the road.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now as sprint goes back and activate 800mhz services and 8t8r the cost to upgrade sites are a lot lower since cell sites has the new base station gear which is supposed to save Sprint money anyways being that the equipment is new and modernized.

Excellent comment. Especially with B26, the cost is very minimal. Now that Sprint just started 8t8r,things should ramp up some more.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent comment. Especially with B26, the cost is very minimal. Now that Sprint just started 8t8r,things should ramp up some more.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Sprint really needs to get the ball rolling on B26, I have it in my area but it's for the most part useless. :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint really needs to get the ball rolling on B26, I have it in my area but it's for the most part useless. :P

At this point, pretty sure b26 and 8'er equipment is priority over everything.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bout we wait until 3rd quarter results are released from the big 4 to compare what they spent on capex?

Aww, that's not as fun as blind speculation!

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This article is so poor on research that it should have not been published.  Unnamed sources?  Jeffries probably quoted a Verizon source on behalf of Sprint.

 

We know that Sprint is spending the resources to get the equipment up and running. Getting the equipment, manpower and other items to make this happen in areas is the issue.   

 

Why do you think Jefferies is quoting a Verizon source?

 

 

 

The organizational structure around this change is still being ironed out--we suspect that it's a cause for the slow spending trends they're experiencing right now."

 

 

Do you disagree with this statement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

S. Ali makes me eyes bleed fire... That is all. I shouldn't let him get to me, but he does. And now Robert has a new impersonator on fierce wireless. It's funny. Robert you are so famous that you have a impersonator now!

He is obviously a troll trying to get a bite from someone, however I did enjoy reading the very informative comment you posted regarding the matter! :)  

 

AT&T's LTE deployment has slowed but they are still investing in there network, and Sprint has been constant in there LTE deployment and rip and replace upgrades (some people are just impatient).  I keep an eye on RootMetrics and I have seen plenty of areas where Sprint has stolen the limelight away from Verizon according to RootMetric's reliability index. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is obviously a troll trying to get a bite from someone, however I did enjoy reading the very informative comment you posted regarding the matter! :)

 

AT&T's LTE deployment has slowed but they are still investing in there network, and Sprint has been constant in there LTE deployment and rip and replace upgrades (some people are just impatient). I keep an eye on RootMetrics and I have seen plenty of areas where Sprint has stolen the limelight away from Verizon according to RootMetric's reliability index.

Ive got no idea what is up with that guy. Funny that he posted that he didn't read through my post, which I know he did. It just verified everything I said in my statement. He's pathetic, and will not change his mind or accept refuting opinions or facts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive got no idea what is up with that guy. Funny that he posted that he didn't read through my post, which I know he did. It just verified everything I said in my statement. He's pathetic, and will not change his mind or accept refuting opinions or facts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

 

Hmm, sounds like Legere.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive got no idea what is up with that guy. Funny that he posted that he didn't read through my post, which I know he did. It just verified everything I said in my statement. He's pathetic, and will not change his mind or accept refuting opinions or facts.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

Can't reason with a shill.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...