Jump to content

Moto X 2014 (was "Motorola IHDT56QA1")


Recommended Posts

Posted

n5 would work only if the roaming carrier was using sprints existing bands (ie 800/1900/2600).

 

 

Or one of the other N5 compliant LTE bands, like B4, B5 and B17.  A Sprint SIM card would just need to receive an update to scan those bands too.  Currently the N5 does not scan those other bands with a Sprint SIM card in it.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Posted

This phone is looking better and better. Sounds like it will be as close to Nexus as you can get.

 

http://www.droid-life.com/2014/09/12/motorolas-unlocked-moto-x-will-be-called-the-pure-edition/

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

If there is no Nexus this year or the Nexus specs or RF figures are inferior to this (especially battery), I could see this as my next smartphone. Looking good.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

If there is no Nexus this year or the Nexus specs or RF figures are inferior (especially battery), I could see this as my next smartphone. Looking good.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Totally agree. Or if they go 5.9" on the Nexus like some have speculated. I have a N3 now, but am ready to downsize back to a 5.2 or so.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Totally agree. Or if they go 5.9" on the Nexus like some have speculated. I have a N3 now, but am ready to downsize back to a 5.2 or so.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

4.9" - 5.3" screen size is my preferred range in a smartphone. Maybe 5.5" with nearly zero bezel. Note 2 was slightly too big for my taste.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

4.9" - 5.3" screen size is my preferred range in a smartphone. Maybe 5.5" with nearly zero bezel. Note 2 was slightly too big for my taste.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I'd like something between the HTC Evo 4G LTE at 4.7in. and the One M8 at 5in.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'd like something between the HTC Evo 4G LTE at 4.7in. and the One M8 at 5in.

I've really enjoyed my EVO LTE. It doesn't seem like they will continue the EVO line...

 

I still wonder how a case will affect the reception on the Mofo X

Posted

I've really enjoyed my EVO LTE. It doesn't seem like they will continue the EVO line...

 

I still wonder how a case will affect the reception on the Mofo X

Moto + case = 3x the EVO LTE reception without case :P

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 7
Posted

Moto + case = 3x the EVO LTE reception without case :P

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I love the kickstand! Makes it so much easier to play Candy Crush sitting at a table [emoji3]
  • Like 1
Posted

I love the kickstand! Makes it so much easier to play Candy Crush sitting at a table [emoji3]

Buy a Seidio case.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

Posted

If there is no Nexus this year or the Nexus specs or RF figures are inferior to this (especially battery), I could see this as my next smartphone. Looking good.

I concur. Even if I still pick up an HTC One M8, the 2014 Moto X or Nexus 5 successor will join my arsenal. I cannot find much not to like about the Moto X -- except the AMOLED screen, especially as it is PenTile. But I understand the rationale behind using AMOLED for partial screen active notifications.

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Posted

I concur. Even if I still pick up an HTC One M8, the 2014 Moto X or Nexus 5 successor will join my arsenal. I cannot find much not to like about the Moto X -- except the AMOLED screen, especially as it is PenTile. But I understand the rationale behind using AMOLED for partial screen active notifications.

 

AJ

This. I need something below 5.2 in. so any sort of "Nexus 6" is out. But the AMOLED worries me. My brother's 6-month-old S4T already has some mild burn in. The M8 is cool, but a bit too expensive for me.

Posted

I've never had AMOLED burn in problems. And the way I keep SignalCheck live on my screens all the time for the past few years, I think I'd be a good candidate for burn in. I don't doubt some experience this. But I don't think it's common like it used to be.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

Is this phone going to support Band 41 CA?

 

No.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Posted

No.

 

AJ

I apologize if I missed it earlier in the thread but is that a chipset limitation?

Posted

I've never had AMOLED burn in problems. And the way I keep SignalCheck live on my screens all the time for the past few years, I think I'd be a good candidate for burn in. I don't doubt some experience this. But I don't think it's common like it used to be.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I have a photon 4g and a photon q and have not seen any burn in on either of them.

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Posted

I apologize if I missed it earlier in the thread but is that a chipset limitation?

 

Snapdragon 801 has an integrated Category 4 baseband.

 

AJ

Posted

The 2300 mAh battery is concerning, as others mentioned. If the Android L isn't as efficient as touted, that's a problem for me.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Posted

The 2300 mAh battery is concerning, as others mentioned. If the Android L isn't as efficient as touted, that's a problem for me.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Engadget reviewed the phone and said they were able to make it through the day with a lot of usage on it. I don't see it being an issue.
Posted

Engadget reviewed the phone and said they were able to make it through the day with a lot of usage on it. I don't see it being an issue.

Yeah I'm going to wait for some real world reports, and usage from folks here, and also waiting to see what a possible Nexus X holds. Hopefully you're right.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah I'm going to wait for some real world reports, and usage from folks here, and also waiting to see what a possible Nexus X holds. Hopefully you're right.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Real world will be longer than Engadget says because they put it through a full stress test. Plus that's even good results before android L comes out.
Posted

The reviewer said he used it for a week or so IIRC. Not just a stress test and done.

And he said it lasted him at least a full day of use. What more can you ask for?
Posted

And he said it lasted him at least a full day of use. What more can you ask for?

That's the point I'm getting at. It will be more than enough. Even on the original x I had no issues making it all day.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Well you officially fried my brain. Many of these topics are well beyond my very rudimentary amateur knowledge.. this has my head spinning even more than usual. When someone figures it out, just let me know what I need to do with the app! 😂
    • Confusingly, there are two different types of Cell IDs, the NR Cell ID (NCI) and the Local Cell ID, which I will call the LCID from here on out. From my understanding, @Trip is trying to get the LCID from the NCI but the same gNB is showing up for multiple sites in the app. Some background for those that don’t know about NCIs (NR Cell ID) and how they relate to gNBs and LCIDs. Just like the E/GCI which is comprised of the eNB + LCID with the eNB denoting the site, the NCI is comprised of the gNB + LCID with the gNB denoting the site. A major difference is that the eNB is a fixed number of bits in the E/GCI but the gNB can vary between 22-32 bits (out of 36) in the NCI and there is nothing transmitted which tells you what the length is. The reason for the mentioning LTE sites is that Verizon’s gNB numbering scheme in most of the USA is based upon the sites eNB (using the rules I mentioned) and a 22-bit gNB. Additionally, their LCIDs start at 25 and increment by compinations of 16 and 1. Basically, it is common to see LCID sets of 25/26/27, 41/42/43, and 57/58/59. Looking at Trip’s data and some other data from the area, they are not following the format used in the rest of the USA.  From what I can tell, they are using a 29-bit or 30-bit gNB (that gives LCIDs that follow Verizon’s standard patterning). 29-bit shares the same gNB across the two locations, while 30-bit splits the two sets: 18504107674 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 26 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 26 (30-bit) 18504107690 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 42 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 42 (30-bit)  18504107691 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 43 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 43 (30-bit)  18504107706 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 58 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 58 (30-bit)  18504107707 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 59 (29-bit) or 289126682 + CLID 59 (30-bit) 18504107738 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 90 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 26 (30-bit)  18504107739 - gNB 144563341 + CLID 91 (29-bit) or 289126683 + CLID 27 (30-bit)  If true, this is a problem for SignalCheck and other mapping apps because this means they are using at least two different gNB lengths depending on the location in the USA.
    • Yeah I can confirm that the status bar is updating correctly and as often as the main app!  Great to have that back after so long. Waiting on the app to pick up the 5G data.  I'm on AT&T and I find that it only reports the 5G signal data a fraction of the time.  Once I can get it to pop back up I'll send a report with the LTE RSRP showing up in the status bar instead of the NR RSRP. I am not sure if it is new behavior with the Beta because I had it set to just show the Band since I couldn't display the band and signal at the same time. Edit:  Sent a diagnostic and here's a screenshot:
    • Yes, for various reasons the beta mapping project was limited to S4GRU sponsors at launch. It's still a work in progress but I have added a few users as it has evolved. I am inclined to leave it as-is for now -- it's not completely off-limits to discuss here (especially if there's an outage), but with so many posts I just try to keep discussions organized. RAvirani handles the map server and he monitors the other thread closer.   I might be confused, but are we talking apples and oranges here? My interpretation was Trip is talking about NR cells on different sites sharing cell IDs as far as the app is concerned, while the other comments are about LTE to NR cell ID calculations?
    • I hope this is true!! The Android development team did claim this bug was fixed several months ago, and it is typical for it to take several releases before changes are included. I was on the Android beta until I got my Pixel 9, now I am back on the public releases. With each monthly update, I have optimistically checked this icon and been disappointed. This would be fantastic to get back!   Could you send some diagnostic reports when you see this please? It is new behavior with QPR Beta 3?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...