Jump to content

Moto X 2014 (was "Motorola IHDT56QA1")


Recommended Posts

Posted

I agree. Does the S5 have that size. I thought it was 2500 mAh?

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Galaxy S5 is 2800MAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Posted

The original moto was already awesome on battery. I see this one being pretty good as well. I haven't looked at specs so this all just my experience on using the previous version.

Posted

Battery testing for phones is in a weird spot right now. Suppose the most battery-draining things about my phone right now are straining for a data signal, and acdisplay for pseudo active notifications. The new Moto X has additional LTE bands and "true" active notifications. These features could result in significant improvements in battery life for me with identical usage, but it will not show up in a battery test which is cycling through web pages with full signal strength at x nits of brightness etc.

Posted

if moto was staying with google, I'd be all about this phone for myself and family, but there is too much unknown about how well legacy momo devices will be supported once lenovo takes over and starts designing their own devices.

Posted

if moto was staying with google, I'd be all about this phone for myself and family, but there is too much unknown about how well legacy momo devices will be supported once lenovo takes over and starts designing their own devices.

I'm excited for lenovo to take over. Assuming their phones are the same quality their thinkpad line up is.
  • Like 1
Posted

yeah, I am too a big fan of lenovo, I'm still using a thinkpad t60p (one of the last great laptops with a hi-rez non-widescreen panel) and my brother just bought a yoga 2 pro on my recommendation.

 

just standard anxiousness about the changing of the guard so to speak.

Posted

I almost bought an M8 this weekend, but now I think I want this instead!!!

 

Yeah, I'm inclined to get this one too.

 

Robert

Posted

Yeah, I'm inclined to get this one too.

 

Robert

 

I'm with both of you.  I'm torn between this and the new iPhone (and the new Nexus IF it isn't 5.9" as rumored).  I don't know if I can give up the customization of Android though after having a Nexus 5. 

 

Probably will wait and see what the real life RF performances are of the devices...  and if USCC gets bought out by Sprint or becomes a RRPP member since their 10x10 B12 channel would be a great fallback in the rural areas around here! 

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm with both of you.  I'm torn between this and the new iPhone (and the new Nexus IF it isn't 5.9" as rumored).  I don't know if I can give up the customization of Android though after having a Nexus 5. 

 

Probably will wait and see what the real life RF performances are of the devices...  and if USCC gets bought out by Sprint or becomes a RRPP member since their 10x10 B12 channel would be a great fallback in the rural areas around here! 

Yep. If the next Nexus ends up being a giant, I'll go with this.

Posted

At least I am not the only one tempted by this phone... I'll be interested to see how much bloatware there is on it though.

Posted

What advantages would this phone have for a Nexus 5 owner? Just better roaming support?

Posted

I'm with both of you. I'm torn between this and the new iPhone (and the new Nexus IF it isn't 5.9" as rumored). I don't know if I can give up the customization of Android though after having a Nexus 5.

 

Probably will wait and see what the real life RF performances are of the devices... and if USCC gets bought out by Sprint or becomes a RRPP member since their 10x10 B12 channel would be a great fallback in the rural areas around here!

I don't live in an area that benefits from any of the RRPP bands...just the Big 4 here.

 

The only thing I'm skeptical about, though, is if I would like the pure android experience. I've had two HTCs and I really like the way Sense looks.

Posted

At least I am not the only one tempted by this phone... I'll be interested to see how much bloatware there is on it though.

Motorola has next to no bloatware of their own and Sprint has been shuttling their stuff all into a Sprint Zone thing and/or making it uninstallable. This should meet your expectations.

What advantages would this phone have for a Nexus 5 owner? Just better roaming support?

Yes. Maybe better reception overall, Moto talked a big game with their actively tuned antenna. Snapdragon 801 also has better battery performance over the 800 (I think largely due to baseband). You might like the material options and curved back, you might like the active notification features, you might like the amoled display.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

...

Probably will wait and see what the real life RF performances are of the devices... and if USCC gets bought out by Sprint or becomes a RRPP member since their 10x10 B12 channel would be a great fallback in the rural areas around here!

I would very much like to see these roaming agreements begin operating, and uscc support would be huge for when our family goes on trips to eastern North Carolina Edited by djw39
Posted

Any news come out on a Sprint version of the new X? I love Motorola phones, kinda want to wait for the new Nexus. Although I could get both..... but I'll pass on that. Kinda hoping that the Rf performance on the new Moto X is going to be a beast.

  • Like 1
Posted

 you might like the active notification features, 

 

I wonder if you can turn this off?  One of the biggest problems I have with iPhones (aside from the fact that they are made by Apply :-P ) is that notifications come on even when the screen is off.  I've never used one, but asked my sister why she always turned it upside when she set it down, and got scratches all over the screen protector.  And she said it's because the stuff pops up and if she's in a meeting at work or something she doesn't want people seeing her notifications.  How stupid that it can't be turned off!  (Unless maybe it can, and she never tried to.)

Posted

Any news come out on a Sprint version of the new X? I love Motorola phones, kinda want to wait for the new Nexus. Although I could get both..... but I'll pass on that. Kinda hoping that the Rf performance on the new Moto X is going to be a beast.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-373-teaser-x-marks-the-spot-for-the-first-sprint-ccarrpp-fully-compliant-handset/

  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder if you can turn this off? One of the biggest problems I have with iPhones (aside from the fact that they are made by Apply :-P ) is that notifications come on even when the screen is off. I've never used one, but asked my sister why she always turned it upside when she set it down, and got scratches all over the screen protector. And she said it's because the stuff pops up and if she's in a meeting at work or something she doesn't want people seeing her notifications. How stupid that it can't be turned off! (Unless maybe it can, and she never tried to.)

Both Android and iOS will let you customize notifications and turn that stuff off. On the Moto X it will be a little different in that the whole screen doesn't need to turn on, so it won't be nearly as bright. I think they also give you a setting to snooze active notifications at night.
Posted

Since the antenna is around the outside, I wonder how putting a case would affect the reception. Would the phone still be able to detect where you were holding it?

Posted

If a USCC roaming agreement happend will the Nexus 5 work or will I need to go to the new Motorola for that? I do a lot of traveling in rural Iowa so USCC would be huge for me personally.

Posted

If a USCC roaming agreement happend will the Nexus 5 work or will I need to go to the new Motorola for that? I do a lot of traveling in rural Iowa so USCC would be huge for me personally.

You'll be fine. USCC has band 5 cl850 overlaid over almost their entire lte footprint.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

If a USCC roaming agreement happend will the Nexus 5 work or will I need to go to the new Motorola for that? I do a lot of traveling in rural Iowa so USCC would be huge for me personally.

 

n5 would work only if the roaming carrier was using sprints existing bands (ie 800/1900/2600).

 

the new motorola supports the non-sprint bands of the roaming carriers.

 

So really it depends on if uscc would lease/use any of sprints lte bands.

 

Ideally, sprint will be pushing a lot of rural carriers on to excess b41 spectrum (even if it is only 5 or 10 mhz worth) so that both sprint and roaming carriers can inter-share on that band.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...