Jump to content

Moto X 2014 (was "Motorola IHDT56QA1")


NateC

Recommended Posts

This is definitely the Moto X (2014) and AT&T + Verizon Models.

 

Dimensions (soft feel model) 72.4 (width) x 140.8 (height) x 3.8-9.9 (thickness)

 

XT1095 / XT1097 (AT&T) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz) 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 05, 07, 17, 29) 

 

XT1096 (Verizon) GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); CDMA (850, 1900 MHz); 4G LTE (02, 03, 04, 07, 13)

 

http://www.androidcentral.com/moto-x-specs-2014

Edited by atomic50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The moto x with the leather back is nice. Too bad ATT and Verizon have the exclusive on moto maker. Hope it isn't too long. Moto could be a nice mini to my max device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz);

UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz);

CDMA (850/1900 MHz);

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below:

 

4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41)

 

It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

 

Wait...  So this includes USCC's main band, B12?  Very nice if the rumored USCC LTE roaming deal comes along pretty soon!  :tu:

 

Also Motorola typically (at least in my past experiences) puts out devices with above average RF performance.  Hopefully this will be the same.  Depending on what else comes out this month or next, I may need to give this device some serious consideration.

 

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

4 8 15 16 23 42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I am mistaken most of USCC LTE is band 5. Not that that is a problem for this device. :tu:

 

My pet peeve is the listing of bands that are subsets of bands. Listed are 02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41. By that logic, they should have also included 19 and 38 (and possible some others) to it.

 

Or better yet just save some numbers and list 4, 17, 25, 26, 41... ;)

 

I know around here B12 is USCC's main LTE band, but they refarmed their 850 spectrum to also add on B5 for the iPhone.  In my particular county, USCC has a 10x10 chunk in B12 (700a and b - USCC is probably the sole reason why there isn't any native AT&T coverage since they grabbed 700b and the cellular A license), but only a 5x5 chunk for LTE in B5.  Either way, good news!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is anybody else amazed at the quick charge? I had no idea this type of charging existed, or will. How does this not degrade the battery quicker... I need an adult...or a battery expert.

Really sounds amazing. But wondering what the catch is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me.

 

Charge slowly, and carry a big stick.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get a otg stick and carry it with me. More concerned with battery. But the fast charge aspect is nice.

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Android L is actually 35+ pct more efficient battery then I don't know that the battery will be an issue.

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this, but why not just pack a larger battery like the rest of the competition? Imagine Android L with a 3000 mAh battery.

 

Sent from my SM-G900P

I agree. Does the S5 have that size. I thought it was 2500 mAh?

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...