Jump to content
joshuam

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

Sprint actually has been running 40mhz

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

It's actually 60

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's actually 60

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Proof

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proof

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

That's what Sprint originally said.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Real world difference. This is definitely the press they need..

Also this is Tmobile 4G vs Sprint 5G

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More! This is pretty insane..

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint is showing some good results. Granted, it’s not 1gbps but it’s exceeded Verizon in terms of coverage and reliability. Kudos to Sprint! This is the good press they needed. Playing up their strength of allowing the reviewers to walk around the city and still maintain speeds looks great on them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Terrell352 said:

Proof

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

PCMag said it's 60MHz of spectrum.

https://www.pcmag.com/news/368681/sprint-launches-first-broad-5g-coverage-in-4-cities

Also when Sprint was in Barcelona at MWC they said they would devote 60MHz to LTE and 60MHz to 5G. The only time they used 40MHz for 5G was in their demo at Google IO.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RedSpark said:

I hope we get an update on official VoLTE support at some point soon.

Forgive me, but it seems a bit ridiculous that Sprint’s talking about launching 5G when VoLTE isn’t officially available nationwide or on popular phones like the S9/S9+/Note 9/Pixel 3 series, etc.

Maybe 5G is the best way for VoLTE for Sprint minus a merger.  When your this late for the party, might be better to be early for the next one.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To all the people crying about VoLTE availability on certain existing phones and trying to relate that with the requirement for VoLTE being turned on for access to 5G need to realize that none of the devices they are crying about will ever see 5G and none of the 5G devices will have to "wait" for VoLTE to be accessible in settings. Two unrelated things. As for VoLTE not being nationwide, neither is the current deployment of 5G

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, cyclone said:

To all the people crying about VoLTE availability on certain existing phones and trying to relate that with the requirement for VoLTE being turned on for access to 5G need to realize that none of the devices they are crying about will ever see 5G and none of the 5G devices will have to "wait" for VoLTE to be accessible in settings. Two unrelated things. As for VoLTE not being nationwide, neither is the current deployment of 5G

Taking your statement on its face. What do you expect the uptake for 5G devices to be on Sprint as part of the customer base?

The LG V50 is the only 5G handset on Sprint until the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G launches. Note that the LG V50 is only available in the four initial 5G Launch Markets to start off.

We probably won’t have an iPhone 5G until Fall 2020 given the Intel/Qualcomm issues, in addition to the fact that 5G isn’t widely available enough for Apple’s liking. Of course, VoLTE is supported on iPhone 8 and later models, so that’s not a concern here.

So yes, some folks will upgrade to these 5G devices and have VoLTE right away.

In short, there are more current customers who have relatively current devices like the S9/Note 9/Pixel 3 series who don’t yet have VoLTE supported than the people who are upgrading to 5G devices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would Sprint want to show off how awful their LTE network is in actual use? Having 1 network run at 3 Mbps which 99.99% of your customers use seems pretty embarrassing to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why would Sprint want to show off how awful their LTE network is in actual use? Having 1 network run at 3 Mbps which 99.99% of your customers use seems pretty embarrassing to me.
Dude come on you know that's a false claim. Sprint hits faster DL speed than that

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes. Agreed. This speed test shows the stark difference between LTE and 5G: 
 
Either there was a super low signal, or B41 LTE was very congested. While 5G was empty. Not really impressed with the 5G speed seeing as no one else was on it. Maybe the site doesn't have enough backhaul?

And that definitely looks like B41 LTE for upload on 5G.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ingenium said:

Either there was a super low signal, or B41 LTE was very congested. While 5G was empty. Not really impressed with the 5G speed seeing as no one else was on it. Maybe the site doesn't have enough backhaul?

And that definitely looks like B41 LTE for upload on 5G.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

While its peak speeds might not be super duper impressive(im ok with its 800mbs peak so far), since it seems to have super smooth handoff from LTE this will be just like as if you just added 40-60Mhz of spectrum which is awesome. Plus, as you mentioned, not many users on it, so it will be like taking a freeway with a toll and way less congestion. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, ingenium said:

Either there was a super low signal, or B41 LTE was very congested. While 5G was empty. Not really impressed with the 5G speed seeing as no one else was on it. Maybe the site doesn't have enough backhaul?

And that definitely looks like B41 LTE for upload on 5G.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

Either way though, 5G is doing what it’s supposed to do here.

They should add capacity to that LTE site, if it’s picking up a different one.

I seem to recall that the footprint for 5G from Massive MIMO sites will essentially be the same as the LTE footprint from them, given that Sprint is using similar frequencies and running it off of the same Massive MIMO gear. Of course, not every site will be Massive MIMO.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1e335202dd671fba641715b046bef34c.jpg

The speeds we are seeing are with hardly any phones on the 5G network.. once more phones got on to the network... mmmmm , just throwing that out there.. I just hope the total of 120mhz will be used as stated by John that 5G phone can makes use of all the spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1e335202dd671fba641715b046bef34c.jpg
The speeds we are seeing are with hardly any phones on the 5G network.. once more phones got on to the network... mmmmm , just throwing that out there.. I just hope the total of 120mhz will be used as stated by John that 5G phone can makes use of all the spectrum
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
They will have to at some point. That's the plan under new Tmobile. Not sure how Sprint is going to do it on there own

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

1e335202dd671fba641715b046bef34c.jpg

The speeds we are seeing are with hardly any phones on the 5G network.. once more phones got on to the network... mmmmm emoji848.png, just throwing that out there.. I just hope the total of 120mhz will be used as stated by John that 5G phone can makes use of all the spectrum

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

They can eventually dynamically allocate spectrum from LTE to 5G. So not really a big concern. If I can enjoy 100mbs+ speeds as an early adopter (vs 5-10mb on LTE) I'll take it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They can eventually dynamically allocate spectrum from LTE to 5G. So not really a big concern. If I can enjoy 100mbs+ speeds as an early adopter (vs 5-10mb on LTE) I'll take it.
I still think that 5G will work better by combining with TMO. That way all 2.5 can be used along with B71. Then in the future when everyone gets 5G devices reframe B25 to 5G

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to see how the Samsung and Nokia equipment handles 5G. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, just dawned on me that the 4G is the primary and 5g is the 4th carrier (channel), hence the slow upload speeds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

Hmmm, just dawned on me that the 4G is the primary and 5g is the 4th carrier (channel), hence the slow upload speeds.

Ah ok makes sense. It seems to be limited to a single upload carrier. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Terrell352 You weren't completely wrong. It appears Sprint is using either 40 or 60MHz of spectrum depending on the market according to FierceWireless.

Quote

For 5G, Sprint is using up to 120 MHz: 60 MHz for LTE and from 40-60 MHz on the 5G NR side at launch.

At a demonstration of its new 5G network in Dallas this morning, speed tests delivered 100 Mbps on the low-end with peak speeds up to 1 Gbps. “You should see 5G speeds about five times above LTE,” said Saw.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • A great article by Jim Patterson on rcrwireless.com. Some nuggets format 2.5GHz: “Braxton, Mike and John have authorized me to do some work at risk this year in getting ourselves ready to deploy the 2.5 gigahertz spectrum as soon as the deal closes. Nobody is more impatient for this thing to close than me. I wish I was deploying 2.5 radio on the network right now, but we’ve done work at low cost in terms of securing, permitting, and authorization to deploy 2.5. So as soon as this deal closes, we’re in a position where we can start laying down 2.5 radio on the new T-Mobile network.” Enterprise:   T-Mobile inherits not only a trough of spectrum with the Sprint acquisition, but hundreds of seasoned enterprise sales executives.  As Mike Sievert recently acknowledged in his appearance at the Citi conference a month ago, T-Mobile is under-indexed in enterprise.   Sprint’s enterprise roots are significant, having commanded close to 20% of the enterprise data market as recently as 2006.  There are many sales executives who cut their teeth with fleet management solutions (Nextel and Sprint), wireless access solutions (Clearwire and Sprint) and IP MPLS (Sprint).  *Without going through all of the details it’s important to note that the Apple iPhone 7 and iPhone 8 (and their variants) have the 2.5 GHz band already installed in the GSM (T-Mobile) version, and that the CDMA (Sprint) version of these devices already has T-Mobile’s Low Band 700 MHz spectrum, a.k.a. Band 12 (and Band 66 in the case of iPhone 😎 already enabled.  The CDMA version of the iPhone SE also has Band 12 enabled. Bottom line: there is the potential for backwards compatibility within the current handsets. And the iPhone XS (and variants) and iPhone 11 (and variants) are universal devices and include T-Mobile’s 600 MHz band which will be have a big benefit for Sprint customers. https://www.rcrwireless.com/20200216/analyst-angle/the-sunday-brief-new-t-mobile-cat-5-hurricane  
    • Good.  I bought shares in Shentel (SHEN) and US Cellular (USM) a year or two ago when their stock prices went down.  Waiting for a business consolidation event that causes their value to double or more.
    • Nice.  All three of my 4G Sprint phones are ready or near ready for upgrade.  I will wait until the "attractive offers" start.
    • I believe this has been discussed here, but is there a way to force the MB to latch onto B25 instead of B41? Where mine is located, it latches on to a VERY weak B41 signal instead of B25. None of my phones can get B41 at this location so the signal is very, very weak. The problem with latching on to B41, I get a decent download speed from the MB (close to 20 Mbps) but upload is less than 1 Mbps. This is with 1 user. I notice that if I run a speedtest on the MB, during the upload segment, the MB will actually fall offline (lose all LTE data activity). No data throughput when connected to the MB for 2-3 minutes after/during an upload speedtest. Would the MB phone support team be able to force the MB on to B25?
    • Those people that think that T-Mobile does not need to offer attractive offers to upgrade the handsets just imagine what kind of offers AT&T and Verizon will start offering to Sprint customers. A brand new iPhone on us or an attractive trade-in offer if you bring your number to us and you won't have to worry about these integration pains. Oh and these attractive per month plans. They will try to poach each and every Sprint customers. So T-Mobile will have to fight for each and every customer. They better come prepared.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...