Jump to content
joshuam

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

On B41 wouldn't it need 3xca up and 64qam? B25 in areas that have higher BW then 5x5.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

My point is that spectrum is available, Sprint just decided that upload speeds are alot less of a priority.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My point is that spectrum is available, Sprint just decided to keep upload speeds alot less of a priority.

Unfortunately and I don't like it. I live in Minnesota and ever summer I go up north which has had very little B41 so the network was completely unusable even upload pics would fail. There was no excuse for that either, cause they have enough spectrum for 10x10 B25 there it's only 5x5 tho Hope it's better this summer cause of tri band upgrades.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint could easily achieve comparable uploads with 1.9 or 2.5.
1.9 maybe but 2.5 I'm going to need to see some proof. 2xCA is only active if your really close to the tower and if your inside even when it is active speeds are not good on upload. Even 3XCA which Sprint is unlikely to do anyway couldn't pull it off.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Terrell352 said:

1.9 maybe but 2.5 I'm going to need to see some proof. 2xCA is only active if your really close to the tower and if your inside even when it is active speeds are not good on upload. Even 3XCA which Sprint is unlikely to do anyway couldn't pull it off.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Clean SNR B41 3xCA 64QAM upload would most definitely achieve speeds that are similar. But would be pretty fragile and only benefit a tiny percentage of users. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1.9 maybe but 2.5 I'm going to need to see some proof. 2xCA is only active if your really close to the tower and if your inside even when it is active speeds are not good on upload. Even 3XCA which Sprint is unlikely to do anyway couldn't pull it off.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

The only way sprint can pull it off .. they have to dedicate more TDD spectrum towards the actual upload without using CA. Like they were doing with with the earlier configuration. That’s what I think hes talking-about

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only way sprint can pull it off .. they have to dedicate more TDD spectrum towards the actual upload without using CA. Like they were doing with with the earlier configuration. That’s what I think hes talking-about
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
On that config in real world 48-50 would be the limit in perfect conditions without anyone on the tower. 3XCa upload in that config could do around 75 up though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Terrell352 said:

On that config in real world 48-50 would be the limit in perfect conditions without anyone on the tower. 3XCa upload in that config could do around 75 up though.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

The hope is that with 5G's wider channels will help stabilize upload speeds. If I see over 5mb at the edge with 2 layer MIMO id be ok.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Iirc TDD on 5NR can also have more flexible timing arrangements. Basically shift to upload more quickly if all the download slots are not filled. Sorry, no link. No guarantees Sprint would do this either.  Really best to just wait and see at this point. 8 days away.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nexgencpu said:

The hope is that with 5G's wider channels will help stabilize upload speeds. If I see over 5mb at the edge with 2 layer MIMO id be ok.

Exactly this. Uploads should be a lot better on the 40MHz (or higher) channel, even with the current TDD configuration. This is why standalone NR should be iimportant for Sprint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That’s the upload on 5G? Really?



That’s how you know it’s Sprint ;-)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Post pictures.  Triangulate by getting three sectors.  Switch phone to CDMA may also help if 1x800 is active, which might  give the GPS for the actual site.
I found the site on the NE side of town(I'll try to get photos later). No sign of 25 or 41 or any signs of 1x800. All my CDMA is on North Dakota PCS Alliance (aka Verizon).

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5G is now included in the legend. Very interesting indeed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A thought I had poking around Spectrum Omega. What are the odds of Sprint doing swaps with Dish for their PCS H block? Do they even have anything Dish would want?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A thought I had poking around Spectrum Omega. What are the odds of Sprint doing swaps with Dish for their PCS H block? Do they even have anything Dish would want?

H block is useless for sprint or any cellular carrier as they are currently configured. Beating a dead horse really.

 

In addition Dish had FCC create a brand new lte band using it and some unpaired AWS-3 (25x15? Something like that). So in all likelihood theyre not going to split just the H block out when they can demand $$$$ for the entire block.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

H block is useless for sprint or any cellular carrier as they are currently configured. Beating a dead horse really.

 

In addition Dish had FCC create a brand new lte band using it and some unpaired AWS-3 (25x15? Something like that). So in all likelihood theyre not going to split just the H block out when they can demand $$$$ for the entire block.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Interesting. Ok. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, lilotimz said:

In addition Dish had FCC create a brand new lte band using it and some unpaired AWS-3 (25x15? Something like that).

Looks like that would be band 70 which no devices currently support. I see now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dish provides a greenfield 5g opportunity, 4g capacity or a partnerconglomerllcship. American grit as Charlie has described it from 2014-now has not built a network for cellular. Grit ain't free, spectrum only squawks if you energize it, and interest will bear soon. 

Band 70 would be neat. NR 70 would be sweet.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Looks like that would be band 70 which no devices currently support. I see now. 

Yeah if the H Block was completely B25 compatible then I'm sure Sprint would have tried to get it.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Dish's Band 70 is composed by 1995-2020 Mhz on the downlink and 1695-1710 on the downlink. It is a unique band as in nobody else has it and it is not on any phone. If Dish is selling, Verizon might be interested because they could beef up their midband and they could pull it off since they have 130 million subs. If the merger is not approved then T-mobile might be interested in Dish's AWS-3 holdings and Sprint might be interested in their 600Mhz. That's why Dish is so vehemently opposed to the merger because all of a sudden it takes out 2 potential customers for their spectrum. If the merger goes through their best play would be to have their spectrum hosted by one of the remaining carriers and they themselves becoming the 4th carrier with no customers to begin with. I don't think that they are looking forward to that. Their play was to acquire Clearwire and/or Sprint and when that failed, to speculate on spectrum. I think they counted on spectrum scarcity but with the advent of CBRS and C-Band that speculative play is no longer lucrative. If they're still interested in selling, they will take a very substantial haircut particularly on their AWS-3 holdings.

Edited by bigsnake49

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tornado not too far from Sprint HQ.4bc22901d323bf0df07ed1207b7e1328.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, mdob07 said:

Tornado not too far from Sprint HQ.4bc22901d323bf0df07ed1207b7e1328.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I wonder if that's what spurred the tweets about hurricane readiness today. "We're ready for hurricanes but not the tornadoes about to take out our HQ". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In all seriousness though, that is a huge tornado according to the velocities radar. Be aware and safe those in that area! Keep your eyes and ears open!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In all seriousness though, that is a huge tornado according to the velocities radar. Be aware and safe those in that area! Keep your eyes and ears open!
Yeah it looks bad on Radar. Looks like rotation will go north of Overland Park though. I hope everyone in the KC area is paying attention to the warnings.bbacfe7fd5a1d364e591514b7ff67354.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mdob07 said:

Yeah it looks bad on Radar. Looks like rotation will go north of Overland Park though. I hope everyone in the KC area is paying attention to the warnings.bbacfe7fd5a1d364e591514b7ff67354.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I see you use RadarScope as well. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Akron, OH - Median download speed increased from 22.7Mbps to 30.8Mbps.  Baltimore, MD - Median download speed increased from 24.4Mbps to 32.8Mbps.  Charlotte, NC - Median download speed increased from 14.7Mbps to 22Mbps.  Des Moines, IA - Median download speed increased from 16.8Mbps to 23.8Mbps. Fort Meyers, FL - Median download speed decreased from 15.5Mbps to 8.6Mbps. Mobile, AL - Median download speed increased from 18Mbps to 29.9Mbps. 
    • Sprint can't afford to go private, they can't afford to buy back shares from stockholders, going private won't happen.  Either the merger will pass (60/40 chance at this point), if not Son will find a buyer for Sprint and take a loss (hello WeWork) and as a trader the way Sprint's shares are trading its almost as if market makers are already pricing in a merger failure.  Sprint would have to do some serious trimming off its balance sheet, sale portions of its network and subs, or even file Chapter 11.  I don't really see Sprint filing bankruptcy I've seen companies with worse earnings and survive.  Son just wants out of the U.S. wireless market and merging with T-Mobile is the fastest way to do so all while pitching this "5G for all" bs <--- I don't even have faith in T-Mobile post merger if it happens.  Sprint needs someone with deep pockets like Altice or another large cable company (and most certainly not Dish). 
    • Yes, some of you disagree with me.  That's to be expected.  Sprint sucks in some places.  But Sprint is not only great in my area, but they're actually the best.  And in most metro areas, they are perfectly usable.  But guess what?  T-mobile sucks in many places.  And I can tell you here in their home market, they're the worst carrier.  Verizon also stinks in places too.  I suppose if I lived in a crappy Sprint market, I'd go.  But I can tell you I see more and more people who leave Sprint and either come back or even if they don't, admit that the network wasn't as bad as they thought and there was a complete over dramatization in the disparity in networks.  Everybody's gotta do what's best for themselves.  And if leaving Sprint is best for you, I certainly wouldn't hold it against anyone.  I've seen many go over the years.  And I still sit here plugging away behind the keyboard.  But the one thing that won't continue is the overly negative drumbeat that's happening in this thread.  You all are starting to build off each other's negativity, causing the conversation to become one sided and pointless.  Don't want to hear ad infinitum the same droll negative grumblings.  Especially the same 'ol criticisms and Sprint can't be trusted.  Frankly, the drama is not true.  Sprint took longer, yes, but it did upgrade its network, and the performance is better.  And on the whole, it's better than its ever been.  So it cannot be said Sprint didn't do it.  They did. So let's stick to the thread discussion, which is the merger.  Not on the network performance on Lower Botswana Avenue and your thoughts on changing networks because of your block. Robert 
    • Boost founder has already said he would pay $2b for the brand back. 
    • Hi, Robert While I see your points, I respectfully disagree with some of them.  Properly managed, Sprint does have the resources to compete successfully.  But the key phrase is "properly managed", and that's where Sprint has shown critical weakness time and time again. Since Dan Hesse was screwed over in the Metro PCS debacle, and then dumped after Softbank took over, Sprint hasn't shown any signs of intelligent strategic management.  Tactically, they have tried hard to succeed, and have kept up with technology, and have tried to keep up with deployments.  But Softbank's refusal to provide capital (either directly or through 3rd parties), Claure's ham-handed cost cutting,  and Masa's tunnel-vision focus on merger have all combined to put Sprint in a desperate situation. So I agree with you that Sprint could compete in the future, but I think it is unrealistic to expect Masayoshi and Softbank to actually try to compete.  If the merger fails, I think that it is far more likely that Masa will basically dump Sprint just like he dumped Hesse, and loyal Sprint employees and the few remaining independent stockholders will be left swinging in the wind.  Sprint customers (I've been with Sprint for 20+ years) will also be hung out to dry.  I hope that I am wrong.  Actually, I hope the merger goes through, but if it doesn't, then I hope that I am wrong.  But I'm not counting on it.
  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...