Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Am I seeing this right? Sprint is broadcasting a 3x3 B26 here in Williston, ND? To note, the 1x is what Verizon broadcasts as out here.5bee870218cf849bd19ff96e090b806e.jpga8c64a8eb27581ac0c3ce5c70d12abe6.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk



Yeah, near the borders some of their B26 channels might be 3 MHz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 28.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • RedSpark

    2032

  • Arysyn

    1124

  • nexgencpu

    1019

  • WiWavelength

    938

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I have to tell you all I am near tears right now.  I am so stoked that Marcelo listened to us, directly.  I am sure he listened to all the feedback he heard.  But I believe S4GRU was influential in th

I'm still shocked and amazed how successful S4GRU has been in staying online, remaining relevant and keeping quality members and staff all with member donations from a relatively small pool. When we

Maybe he's outside of the city limits. He'll tweet as soon as he's back in town with a data connection.

Posted Images


Yeah, near the borders some of their B26 channels might be 3 MHz.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, but this is in roaming territory and definitely not on their coverage map.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, but this is in roaming territory and definitely not on their coverage map.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk


310-120 is most certainly Sprint.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, bretton88 said:

Yeah, but this is in roaming territory and definitely not on their coverage map.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

The GCI matches Sprint for that area.  -99 RSRP on B26 could be many miles away.  Your almost in Montana, but it's market GCI is 094.  US 2 is the major east-west highway in those parts.  See any others?  The Cellular One Montana site did not go that far east.  You were likely north of the site.  3x3 B26 can still be respectable speed wise, Max 21.4 Mbps.

Link to post
Share on other sites
The GCI matches Sprint for that area.  -99 RSRP on B26 could be many miles away.  Your almost in Montana, but it's market GCI is 094.  US 2 is the major east-west highway in those parts.  See any others?  The Cellular One Montana site did not go that far east.  You were likely north of the site.  3x3 B26 can still be respectable speed wise, Max 21.4 Mbps.
I believe I was North of the site. I did not get any signal until I got into the north side of town. I just was surprised to see B26 where no Sprint activity has been mentioned at all. I'm not sure whether to treat it as a native signal yet. I'll see if I can find B25 as well.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, bretton88 said:

Am I seeing this right? Sprint is broadcasting a 3x3 B26 here in Williston, ND? To note, the 1x is what Verizon broadcasts as out here.5bee870218cf849bd19ff96e090b806e.jpga8c64a8eb27581ac0c3ce5c70d12abe6.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

Yes. Canada is primary in that region and thus Sprint only has enough spectrum for 3x3 L800. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
I believe I was North of the site. I did not get any signal until I got into the north side of town. I just was surprised to see B26 where no Sprint activity has been mentioned at all. I'm not sure whether to treat it as a native signal yet. I'll see if I can find B25 as well.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk

The GCI matches Sprint for that area.  -99 RSRP on B26 could be many miles away.  Your almost in Montana, but it's market GCI is 094.  US 2 is the major east-west highway in those parts.  See any others?  The Cellular One Montana site did not go that far east.  You were likely north of the site.  3x3 B26 can still be respectable speed wise, Max 21.4 Mbps.
Am I seeing this right? Sprint is broadcasting a 3x3 B26 here in Williston, ND? To note, the 1x is what Verizon broadcasts as out here.5bee870218cf849bd19ff96e090b806e.jpga8c64a8eb27581ac0c3ce5c70d12abe6.jpg

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk


New added coverage maybe?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint's First 5G Devices Available May 31; Pre-Order Begins May 17 for LG V50 ThinQ 5G and HTC 5G Hub

  • LG V50 ThinQ 5G is just $24 per month with $0down with Sprint Flex lease – that’s half off the lease price.1
  • HTC 5G Hub is just $12.50 per month – that’s a savings of 50 percent. Activate HTC 5G Hub with 100GB of high-speed data for just $60 per month.2

Big news. Who’s ordering?

Fine Print:

1 LG V50 $24/month after $24/month credit, applied within two bills. With approved credit, 18-month lease, and new line of service or eligible upgrade. If you cancel early, remaining balance due. LG V50 ThinQ SRP: $1,152. Reqs capable plan. 5G coverage will be limited in select cities. See Sprint.com/coverage for actual coverage and availability.
2 HTC Hub $12.50/month after $12.50/month credit, applied within two bills. With approved credit, 24-month installment billing agreement, and new line of service. If you cancel early, remaining balance due. Tax due at sale. 5G coverage will be limited in select cities. See Sprint.com/coverage for actual coverage and availability. HTC 5G Hub SRP: $600$60/100GB MBB Price Plan - With AutoPay. MHS reduced to 2G speeds after 100 GB/mo. Data deprioritization during congestion. Excludes taxes, fees and roaming. Number of devices may be limited by hardware. Restrictions apply.
3 New customers must activate 5G handsets on the Unlimited Premium plan. Existing customers must have eligible plan and may be required to change plans. Pricing shown with AutoPay. One Hulu ad-supported plan per eligible Sprint account. HD content varies by device and connection. MHS reduced to 3G speeds after 100GB/month. Data deprioritization during congestion. $80 per month for line one, additional $60 per month for second line, additional $20 per line for lines 3-5. Excludes taxes, fees and roaming.

Curious what constitutes an eligible plan... This is a way to “charge more” for 5G without explicitly saying it.

Edited by RedSpark
Added plan language
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint's First 5G Devices Available May 31; Pre-Order Begins May 17 for LG V50 ThinQ 5G and HTC 5G Hub
  • LG V50 ThinQ 5G is just $24 per month with $0down with Sprint Flex lease – that’s half off the lease price.1
  • HTC 5G Hub is just $12.50 per month – that’s a savings of 50 percent. Activate HTC 5G Hub with 100GB of high-speed data for just $60 per month.2
Big news. Who’s ordering?
Fine Print:
1 LG V50 $24/month after $24/month credit, applied within two bills. With approved credit, 18-month lease, and new line of service or eligible upgrade. If you cancel early, remaining balance due. LG V50 ThinQ SRP: $1,152. Reqs capable plan. 5G coverage will be limited in select cities. See Sprint.com/coverage for actual coverage and availability.
2 HTC Hub $12.50/month after $12.50/month credit, applied within two bills. With approved credit, 24-month installment billing agreement, and new line of service. If you cancel early, remaining balance due. Tax due at sale. 5G coverage will be limited in select cities. See Sprint.com/coverage for actual coverage and availability. HTC 5G Hub SRP: $600. $60/100GB MBB Price Plan - With AutoPay. MHS reduced to 2G speeds after 100 GB/mo. Data deprioritization during congestion. Excludes taxes, fees and roaming. Number of devices may be limited by hardware. Restrictions apply.
New customers must activate 5G handsets on the Unlimited Premium plan. Existing customers must have eligible plan and may be required to change plans. Pricing shown with AutoPay. One Hulu ad-supported plan per eligible Sprint account. HD content varies by device and connection. MHS reduced to 3G speeds after 100GB/month. Data deprioritization during congestion. $80 per month for line one, additional $60 per month for second line, additional $20 per line for lines 3-5. Excludes taxes, fees and roaming.
Curious what constitutes an eligible plan... This is a way to “charge more” for 5G without explicitly saying it.


Only available in 4 cities .. I’m sure not many


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/12/2019 at 9:42 PM, dkyeager said:

The GCI matches Sprint for that area.  -99 RSRP on B26 could be many miles away.  Your almost in Montana, but it's market GCI is 094.  US 2 is the major east-west highway in those parts.  See any others?  The Cellular One Montana site did not go that far east.  You were likely north of the site.  3x3 B26 can still be respectable speed wise, Max 21.4 Mbps.

It's not in my experience. You're lucky to break 500Kbps.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/12/2019 at 9:46 PM, bretton88 said:

I believe I was North of the site. I did not get any signal until I got into the north side of town. I just was surprised to see B26 where no Sprint activity has been mentioned at all. I'm not sure whether to treat it as a native signal yet. I'll see if I can find B25 as well.

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

It'll probably in or close to town. I would check there first. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:


Only available in 4 cities .. I’m sure not many


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah. We’ll see how that goes.

“Both devices will initially be available to customers in the first four expected 5G markets – AtlantaDallasHouston and Kansas City. They will then be available in Sprint’s other 5G markets – ChicagoLos AngelesNew York CityPhoenix and Washington, D.C. – in the next few weeks.”

At least the next set of 5G cities is rolling out soon. I wonder which cities come after that, or if they’re going to pause until the merger decision deadline hits.

That’s one advantage of how Apple trails everyone. The network is more ready for the device.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah. We’ll see how that goes.
“Both devices will initially be available to customers in the first four expected 5G markets – Atlanta, Dallas, Houston and Kansas City. They will then be available in Sprint’s other 5G markets – Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City, Phoenix and Washington, D.C. – in the next few weeks.”
At least the next set of 5G cities is rolling out soon. I wonder which cities come after that, or if they’re going to pause until the merger decision deadline hits.
That’s one advantage of how Apple trails everyone. The network is more ready for the device.

I think they pause the decision is 16 days ways or so .. it funny I was in Phoenix and Vegas this weekend .. I spotted more massive Mimo in Vegas than Phoenix


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:


I think they pause the decision is 16 days ways or so .. it funny I was in Phoenix and Vegas this weekend .. I spotted more massive Mimo in Vegas than Phoenix


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s interesting you observed that.

I’m curious if the 5G in the second wave cities is quietly live yet?

The merger deadline was pushed back to July 29, 2019: https://www.engadget.com/amp/2019/04/29/t-mobile-sprint-merger-deadline-delay/

Seems like the 2nd wave of 5G will take them to the merger deadline. I suspect they’ll hold off on other substantial 5G deployments until after the merger deadline.

Link to post
Share on other sites
That’s interesting you observed that.
I’m curious if the 5G in the second wave cities is quietly live yet?
The merger deadline was pushed back to July 29, 2019: https://www.engadget.com/amp/2019/04/29/t-mobile-sprint-merger-deadline-delay/
Seems like the 2nd wave of 5G will take them to the merger deadline. I suspect they’ll hold off on other substantial 5G deployments until after the merger deadline.

I don’t think that date will be accurate .. according to sources: the doj is sensing that due to the concessions the FCC is inclined to approve the deal. So, the DOJ seem now on board to say yes or no around the same time as the fcc in early June


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tyroned3222 said:


I don’t think that date will be accurate .. according to sources: the doj is sensing that due to the concessions the FCC is inclined to approve the deal. So, the DOJ seem now on board to say yes or no around the same time as the fcc in early June


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Interesting... what makes you think this?   Not saying you're wrong, but am hopeful you are correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Interesting... what makes you think this?   Not saying you're wrong, but am hopeful you are correct.

This is what the article and sources are saying over at Bloomberg .. they are currently saying just about any and everything to get this approved lol.. oh you want all of my prepaid ok that’s fine you can have it lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm hoping they are just dotting the "i's" and crossing the "t's"...   this thing has dragged on long enough.    

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, though said:

Will the HTC 5G work on B41 only? Is "5G" service required for the thing to work at all?

If you go to HTC's website you'll see it has support for pretty much every U.S. LTE band, so no.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

This is what the article and sources are saying over at Bloomberg .. they are currently saying just about any and everything to get this approved lol.. oh you want all of my prepaid ok that’s fine you can have it lol

Bloomberg was the same company that made up the SuperMicro hoax story. I wouldn't trust anything they say.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Brad The Beast said:

It's not in my experience. You're lucky to break 500Kbps.

You're at the edge of the empire, like a Roman soldier on Hadrian's Wall.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It kinda just blows my mind that it's been almost a year and a half since start of auction and there still isn't a band designation. Why spend almost a billion dollars (T-Mobile's $873 million plus Sprint's $114 million) if you can't even get around to working something like that out with the 3GPP? I pray there's something going on behind the scenes, but I'm not too hopeful seeing as the only other owner of the band is DISH, haha.    I'd be shocked if T-Mobile doesn't keep a strong mmWave presence in lower/mid-Manhattan and downtown Brooklyn with their 5G small-cell rollout. That's key use case. But I agree, it'll definitely be interesting to see what they do with them outside of that area. You gotta imagine that Verizon played a pretty big part in how these things were designed, and Verizon typically loads their small cells up with every mid/high-band tech they've got. So it shouldn't be a matter of if the nodes support the tech, just if T-Mobile deploys the radios. IMO, it kinda comes down to if T-Mobile is open to exploring the possibility of mmWave-based Home Internet in NYC.   I really hope they do keep them. Even if they aren't immediately upgraded to 5G, they'd be a big benefit for the network in general. Plus, fiber is already run, permits are already signed, sites are already built. Hopefully the neutral-nature of the nodes makes conversion easy.  I haven't spotted any nodes broadcasting the keep PLMN, but I'm not all that surprised about that.   Agreed. There are one or two redditors (who shall not be named) who love to spread questionable info, especially when it comes to NYC. Every carrier has Manhattan blanketed with mmWave! You can get FIOS at any address! T-Mobile has mmWave on every site and it's fast! T-Mobile has the densest small-cell network! Every site has 5gb/s backhaul (or if it doesn't, it's "just about to be upgraded")! It's really weird. Subreddit used to be so much better before it blew up and a handful of great contributors left.
    • My best guess is that it's a combination of the correct equipment not being available to support all of T-Mobile's mmWave bands and n41 taking precedence over mmWave deployment nationwide. It'll be interesting to see whether T-Mobile decides to make mmWave a citywide thing like Verizon (that they'll aggregate with n41 for gigabit speeds in more places) or if they'll just deploy it in stadiums, airports, and convention centers.  When T-Mobile acquired Metro, they retained pretty much all of their DAS sites. If they retain all of Sprint's small cells, they'd have a small cell network easily rivaling Verizon and could have an extremely dense mmWave/LAA/CBRS footprint to compliment their already dense (in most places) macro network. Someone recently made a post about how T-Mobile's tests in C-band were interfering with a local satellite TV operator so it seems like T-Mobile definitely has some interest in getting C-band deployed sooner than later, even if they won't be able to use the spectrum just yet. But like you said, it'll probably be another year or so before we start seeing deployments of that. I completely missed that thread but reading over it, so many people are very confused about the mmWave situation in NYC and T-Mobile's network here as a whole. It's pretty sad how people completely disregarded OP immediately.
    • Interestingly enough, today I came across a site in Seattle where they did the same thing. Previously, Commscope FFHH-65B-R3 panels were live with quadband; now there's only 1900/2100/2500. My knee jerk reaction is that I don't like this deployment. It makes optimizing handoffs sloppy and complicated. I  shot an email to the Seattle network team asking what the logic is - let's see what they say. 
    • I remember that Textra could ask for a delivered notice. Not sure exactly how that works. Haven't used it in a long time though, Android Messages works fine for me plus get the benefit of RCS.
    • It'll definitely be interesting to see what they do, especially considering there's now a lot more money in the pipeline! Personally, I'm most excited to see what they'll be doing with the new 5G small cells - this should be an opportunity for them to get a super dense n41, LTE-LAA, mmWave, and maybe even CBRS (there is 80MHz of GAA available...) infill. Can't wait to see what they'll be doing with these. This also brings up the question of how they'll be addressing mmWave in the future - have they been holding off on upgrades due to their n41 rollout, or because they're waiting for these small cells to be available? Reminds me of how they paused their LTE-LAA macro rollout, but then began to equip their existing LTE oDAS nodes with LTE-LAA. I am curious about their plans for C-Band, but I'm kinda of the impression that it's a very low priority for them. I doubt we'll be seeing any C-Band rollout for at least another year or so, T-Mobile's spectrum isn't available for deployment until Dec 2023. All that said, their n41 rollout does leave them with a ton of capacity to work with. Makes me wonder if upgrades (besides spectrum reallocation) in NYC will be put on the backburner for a little while. Lots of non-NYC Sprint sites to convert, and I've even spotted some recent Greenfield rural buildout upstate (if you can believe that). On another note, very amusing to see the T-Mobile subreddit respond to that NYC mmWave speedtest the other day.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...