Jump to content
joshuam

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, swintec said:

Within the last week I started getting HD voice, while connected to wifi calling, when a Verizon user calls me.  However if i initiate the call instead HD voice is not there.  What gives?

Also, if i disconnect from wifi and use the cellular network (1x800), no HD voice no matter what.  its been so long so i can not remember but is there no HD voice on 1x?

HD Voice on 1x is only available between Sprint customers, I believe.  And between calling plus enabled devices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, clbowens said:

HD Voice on 1x is only available between Sprint customers, I believe.  And between calling plus enabled devices.

1x Voice HD is Sprint to Sprint only.

HD voice using AMR-WB or EVS-WB is:

  • Calling Plus <--> Calling Plus (CP)
  •  Wifi Calling <--> Wifi Calling (WC)
  • WC <--> CP
  • VoLTE <--> VoLTE
  • VoLTE <--> WC
  • VoLTE <--> CP

 

HD Voice can be used during CP, WC, and VoLTE to another carriers network as well. 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, bakedc4 said:

Best part is Shentel isn't on that tower.51fcc3e3dfc670b4beea34cb2e56fd5b.jpg

Sent from my HTC U12+ using Tapatalk
 

Shentel's on a different tower nearby though, I think.  I believe on the tall Exxon sign near I-81 and US-50.

I have record of AT&T and T-Mobile on that tower.  Am I correct in assuming Verizon is on it as well?  (Looks like T-Mobile is the bottom rack and AT&T the middle rack...)

- Trip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shentel's on a different tower nearby though, I think.  I believe on the tall Exxon sign near I-81 and US-50.
I have record of AT&T and T-Mobile on that tower.  Am I correct in assuming Verizon is on it as well?  (Looks like T-Mobile is the bottom rack and AT&T the middle rack...)
- Trip
You would be correct on all of that sir. If memory serves me correctly, the site on the Exxon sign was our frist B41 site.
I was at the new SU athletic/event center all day and every time I looked out the window it made me laugh. Per Google, the Exxon site is about 2000' away from there.

Sent from my HTC U12+ using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, lilotimz said:

HD Voice can be used during CP, WC, and VoLTE to another carriers network as well. 

 

 

Good to know.  I just cant figure out why when I try to initiate the call on WC to Verizon, HD voice will not appear but the reverse it will (she calls me instead).  Everything else is the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/30/2019 at 7:27 AM, dro1984 said:

They are knee-deep in litigation now from multiple investment firms and clients.   How do you present fictitious earnings news?   IMO, this violates the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) act.   Big time trouble if it does.  

I'm sure the settlement with AT&T (probably bad) is something else they're having to deal with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What do we think about the cause of the delay being Sprint did well this past quarter and they got a really good deal in their settlement with AT&T? News like that could potentially kill the merger. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Brad The Beast said:

What do we think about the cause of the delay being Sprint did well this past quarter and they got a really good deal in their settlement with AT&T? News like that could potentially kill the merger. 

We think that isn't how these things work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Mr.Nuke said:

We think that isn't how these things work.

Isn't how these things work is is unlikely to be true? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May 7, 2019

The results will be posted at www.sprint.com/investors at approximately 4:05 p.m. ET.

Sprint management will host a conference call at 4:30 p.m. ET to discuss the results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow! I'm shocked!

 

 

Not.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Wow! I'm shocked!

 

 

Not.

It is almost as if it was entirely predictable.

On 4/30/2019 at 3:49 PM, Mr.Nuke said:

Which points pretty strongly to May 7th. If that date comes and goes then this post is appropriate...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
May 7, 2019
The results will be posted at www.sprint.com/investors at approximately 4:05 p.m. ET.
Sprint management will host a conference call at 4:30 p.m. ET to discuss the results.
I've already told David this but someone is now claiming Sprint hasn't released their results cause of pending lawsuit's for lieing to investors. Made up but the individual claiming that

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very Nice!

I hope they also get out of the cars and do walking tests as well. Give someone a backpack and a large power cell pack and send them off exploring the city. I would gladly do it... and get my steps in!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Very Nice!

I hope they also get out of the cars and do walking tests as well. Give someone a backpack and a large power cell pack and send them off exploring the city. I would gladly do it... and get my steps in!

Hit him up on Twitter and he might send you a V50. Worth a shot lol. Sounds like a fun way to get the cardio in!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Brad The Beast said:

Hit him up on Twitter and he might send you a V50. Worth a shot lol. Sounds like a fun way to get the cardio in!

I’ll ping someone I know there. 😀

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They are knee-deep in litigation now from multiple investment firms and clients.   How do you present fictitious earnings news?   IMO, this violates the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) act.   Big time trouble if it does.  

 

Numbers aren’t great .. 169 thousand in gains most of this is coming from prepaid migrations without this they only do 40K +. At a loss of 189K.. tough times at sprint.. and another loss of 539m free cash flow

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

 

Numbers aren’t great .. 169 thousand in gains most of this is coming from prepaid migrations without this they only do 40K +. At a loss of 189K.. tough times at sprint.. and another loss of 539m free cash flow

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah. That’s true.

They’ve got 2.5 GHz on about 80% of their Macro Sites, 30,000 small cells (including mini macros and strand mounts), and about 1,500 Massive MIMO units.

This could have been much worse. However, at a certain point, Sprint will run out of road on its cost cutting initiatives.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They’re painting a honest picture now to get that merger approved.

 

 

They sound so boring over the phone. My God.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah. That’s true.
They’ve got 2.5 GHz on about 80% of their Macro Sites, 30,000 small cells (including mini macros and strand mounts), and about 1,500 Massive MIMO units.
This could have been much worse. However, at a certain point, Sprint will run out of road on its cost cutting initiatives.

Ya, at this point there’s absolutely no justification for any further network growth as there is absolutely no return in investment.. if no merger, I think it’s a given sprint lowers capex immediately. Not trying to be super negative, but these numbers with debt that’s coming due. No way sprint as a stand alone keeps up spending on capex


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, derrph said:

They’re painting a honest picture now to get that merger approved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the reason for the shareholder lawsuits is that these reports weren’t completely honest.... and because its FCC Filings painted an honest assessment of Sprint’s situation.

These investor reports do not contain the apocalyptic data/language that Sprint used in its FCC filings to support its case for a merger.

2 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:


Ya, at this point there’s absolutely no justification for any further network growth as there is absolutely no return in investment.. if no merger, I think it’s a given sprint lowers capex immediately. Not trying to be super negative, but these numbers with debt that’s coming due. No way sprint as a stand alone keeps up spending on capex


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

See the Sprint’s current liquidity status on page 20: https://investors.sprint.com/files/doc_financials/quarterly/2018/Q4/Fiscal-4Q18-Sprint-Quarterly-Investor-Update-FINAL.pdf

It seems it’s starting to get thin...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I listened to the Investor's Relations webcast...   I was so difficult to listen to.   I don't even know who Sprint had speaking as I didn't recognize 2 of them.    No more Marcelo, as I know.. he's moved on...  nothing from the CTO, ...    they didn't really offer many answers to many questions... kind of Rubbish.   Just makes me hope the merger happens soon.    The last question and answer:  Basically the out look on Sprint's future if the merger doesn't go through?  Answer:  Sprint will not be able to operate as a national carrier as we know it.  They will be unable to compete with the others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • They should just give to the G block in my area. Tmobile already holds 20x20 and then Sprint 10x10 A block all of which is contiguous so on 5G they can do 30x30. VZW holds the C block here and only has 10x10 on B2. Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
    • The early public plans indicated a market by market approach, which would be typical.
    • I expect that most of the switch-over activity from Sprint to T-Mobile will occur at device activation time with all new devices being activated on the T-Mobile network even if the previous device that is being deactivated was on the Sprint network.  The only devices they will allow to be activated are those that will work properly on the T-Mobile network.  This is why it is planned to take 3 years to move the users from Sprint to T-Mobile.
    • What we have now is the broad brush outline of a deal. DOJ could add more conditions.  I expect the new T-Mobile to have to divest some spectrum in some counties, which they will likely used to trade with AT&T and Verizon to consolidate their spectrum.  I expect focus will shift to 5g with its much larger channel sizes over more CA options for 4g. The duo have been installing 5g capable equipment for a while now according to my sources. So in a converted market you could end up with 20x20 of4g b25, another 4g B25 carrier, and 20x20 of 5g B25 as soon as needed.  The push will be to get everyone on 5g phones.
    • As a now full time stock trader, how bout that 25% move pre-market, easy money!  🤑
  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...