Jump to content
joshuam

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, greenbastard said:

This doesn't kill the merger talk. This is just 4G. Sprint is going to need a lot of money if they want their 2.5 Ghz spectrum to really work.

There are still too many outdoor spots were 2.5 Ghz doesn't reach in major markets today. I don't think I have seen a new Sprint macro tower go up in my area in ages now. Hopefully after the merger, the EBS/BRS band is put to good use.

It should kill the merger talk in this thread, because we have a whole thread dedicated to merger talk here: 

- Trip

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, swintec said:

T-Mobile roaming active for me, started today, in Maine.

Fwiw, it wouldnt be a sprint change / enhancement if it didnt cause me some minor annoyance that I need to deal with.  In this case, when connected to t-mobile lte, it seems to be running on GMT for time so the phone rolls ahead 4 hours causing issues with texting (and probably other stuff).  Progress I suppose. lol

EDIT- I did see some quick connections to band 12 as well.

Everything in your post is consistent with my T-Mobile roaming experience, except that I could not connect to Band 12.  I'll be back in that neighborhood early next week, so we'll see if that's changed at all.

- Trip

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, nexgencpu said:

Looks like Samsung Clear sites are starting to see CA upload as well! Good stuff!

 

I wonder when we’re going to see this on the ALU (Nokia) gear here in the DC Market. I hope they’re swapping out the legacy Clearwire equipment for Massive MIMO.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, swintec said:

T-Mobile roaming active for me, started today, in Maine.

Fwiw, it wouldnt be a sprint change / enhancement if it didnt cause me some minor annoyance that I need to deal with.  In this case, when connected to t-mobile lte, it seems to be running on GMT for time so the phone rolls ahead 4 hours causing issues with texting (and probably other stuff).  Progress I suppose. lol

EDIT- I did see some quick connections to band 12 as well.

Screenshot_20180817-160719.png

Screenshot_20180817-192225.png

Thanks for this post. I have been noticing that my clock also is off by 4  hours sometimes inside my building. I didn't think to check that it was carrier related but will check it the next time. I do roam onto other carriers inside the building unless standing next to the front window.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The small cells that Sprint has been adding on their stores... Here in my market they have about 14 of them.. those are doing to 2xca band 41.. can those small cells also do higher uplink?

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This can happen even when bouncing from tower to tower on the same carrier. It's tower dependent. It took me over a month one time to convince Sprint they had a tower close to my workplace with a clock set to the wrong time.

Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2018 at 1:11 PM, Paynefanbro said:

I'm aware however Massive MIMO equipment is 5G equipment in the case of Sprint. All work being done with regard to Massive MIMO also applies to 5G-NR even though it won't go live for a few months. That's why I said they're the same step. 

It is disappointing that Sprint does not have a not Massive MIMO 5G option.  I assume the price would be significantly less for less robust solution that would allow for both 4G and 5NR.  This would allow more places to have 5NR sooner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

It is disappointing that Sprint does not have a not Massive MIMO 5G option.  I assume the price would be significantly less for less robust solution that would allow for both 4G and 5NR.  This would allow more places to have 5NR sooner.

Pretty sure they can slowly repurpose LTE portion of M-MIMO to 5G nr so that shouldn't be a problem in the very long run. Just like Clear equipment, and those have served their purpose quite well over the last 6 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nexgencpu said:

Pretty sure they can slowly repurpose LTE portion of M-MIMO to 5G nr so that shouldn't be a problem in the very long run. Just like Clear equipment, and those have served their purpose quite well over the last 6 years.

I should have explicitly said cheaper.  4G will be around for a while with the average phone life at 3 years, meaning some keep their phone for 4 or 5 years or even longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, dkyeager said:

I should have explicitly said cheaper.  4G will be around for a while with the average phone life at 3 years, meaning some keep their phone for 4 or 5 years or even longer.

Massive MIMO is actually a very cost effective upgrade for both LTE and 5G:

Dr. saw shared much more detail about the cost efficiencies of Massive MIMO are realized in this article: https://www.fiercewireless.com/5g/sprint-cto-parts-curtain-carrier-s-5g-buildout-process-goals-and-phones

Saw today said that, after Sprint’s technicians install the antenna/radio units and the baseband units, the carrier later will have to install a channel card into the baseband unit in order to turn on 5G services. However, he said that work will cost much less because technicians won’t have to climb the tower in order to install the channel card; instead, they can drive to the base of the tower and install the channel card into the baseband unit at the bottom of the tower.

Then, Saw said, Sprint can activate 5G services through a remote software upgrade. The company has promisedto launch its nationwide mobile 5G network in first half of 2019.

Interestingly, Samsung’s Nyffeler explained that the company’s antenna/radio units will be able to support both 5G and LTE services—and will be able to remotely allocate more spectral capacity toward one technology or the other. That means, Nyffeler said, that Sprint will be able to dynamically take 2.5 GHz spectrum away from its LTE network and allocate it to its 5G network as customer demand grows, without technicians having to climb the company’s towers. Saw cautioned that Sprint would likely keep a significant amount of spectrum dedicated to its LTE network since its customers currently use that technology.

_________________

This sounds pretty awesome. Because Sprint has so much 2.5 Spectrum, it’s able to do this. The more Massive MIMO sites there are, the better the LTE network will be today and the better the 5G network will be in the future.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, RedSpark said:

Massive MIMO is actually a very cost effective upgrade for both LTE and 5G:

Dr. saw shared much more detail about the cost efficiencies of Massive MIMO are realized in this article: https://www.fiercewireless.com/5g/sprint-cto-parts-curtain-carrier-s-5g-buildout-process-goals-and-phones

Saw today said that, after Sprint’s technicians install the antenna/radio units and the baseband units, the carrier later will have to install a channel card into the baseband unit in order to turn on 5G services. However, he said that work will cost much less because technicians won’t have to climb the tower in order to install the channel card; instead, they can drive to the base of the tower and install the channel card into the baseband unit at the bottom of the tower.

Then, Saw said, Sprint can activate 5G services through a remote software upgrade. The company has promisedto launch its nationwide mobile 5G network in first half of 2019.

Interestingly, Samsung’s Nyffeler explained that the company’s antenna/radio units will be able to support both 5G and LTE services—and will be able to remotely allocate more spectral capacity toward one technology or the other. That means, Nyffeler said, that Sprint will be able to dynamically take 2.5 GHz spectrum away from its LTE network and allocate it to its 5G network as customer demand grows, without technicians having to climb the company’s towers. Saw cautioned that Sprint would likely keep a significant amount of spectrum dedicated to its LTE network since its customers currently use that technology.

_________________

This sounds pretty awesome. Because Sprint has so much 2.5 Spectrum, it’s able to do this. The more Massive MIMO sites there are, the better the LTE network will be today and the better the 5G network will be in the future.

I would like to see the cost versus 8T8R.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quiz of the day : what tower equipment is this ? Lol 47169d418523d35c862b25340010fba5.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dkyeager said:

I would like to see the cost versus 8T8R.

I would like to as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm seeing 64QAM uploads on Band 25 in Boston. Where I'd normally get 3-4Mbps uploads on Band 25, I'm getting 9-10 Mbps consistently. 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

Quiz of the day : what tower equipment is this ? Lol

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Maybe old Cricket CDMA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe old Cricket CDMA?
It's Sprint old legacy 3G equipment

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, tyroned3222 said:

It's Sprint old legacy 3G equipment

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

Sprint still hasn't finished El Paso?!? I know there are a few sites that haven't been touched in West Texas (SW of Monahans and between Van Horn and Fort Stockton), but if this site is in the immediate El Paso area, then this is just....?.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint still hasn't finished El Paso?!? I know there are a few sites that haven't been touched in West Texas (SW of Monahans and between Van Horn and Fort Stockton), but if this site is in the immediate El Paso area, then this is just.....
Ya, I'm sure on a bigger scale there are a few more then we would like out there

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice YouTube video of a Site Upgrade with 2.5 GHz.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder why Sprint waited until now to push out all of these software upgrades to the network?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder why Sprint waited until now to push out all of these software upgrades to the network?
Ya, I have asked myself that question a few times lol

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They've had plenty of time and reason before...  don't understand their thinking... 

Edited by dro1984
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Paynefanbro said:

I wonder why Sprint waited until now to push out all of these software upgrades to the network?

Great question!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps they would have been more competitive if these upgrades occurred before the announcement of the merger thus the govt would have vetoed this merger more easily. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Paynefanbro said:

I wonder why Sprint waited until now to push out all of these software upgrades to the network?

Some required core updates, prerequisite upgrades, Samsung sites may have required special modules and then changing the GCI sectors (Sprint tends not to go ahead until all three of its vendors can do something. Latest example - Massive MIMO). Another huge factor was likely the cost of backhaul. They also had to get Son's approval and raise the capital.  5G represents a leapfrog opportunity for Sprint.  Most people don't understand how close to bankruptcy Sprint was before Marcelo took over.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Does your android allow you to connect to wifi and mobile ? By default my android cuts the mobile when I'm on wifi to save data so you need to make sure both can be on at the same time.
    • By the time you get your S20, it'll probably be preloaded with the update that defaults you to T-Mobile bands. Interestingly enough, the IP network part of the connection is still Sprint...but you get VoLTE across the board. With that said, you can install Samsung Band Selection and pick which combination of bands (LTE and NR, though n71 will only work if you also have B2/66 enabled as well, and n41 for the most part doesn't exist) you'll let your phone on. T-Mobile band priority still applies to whatever you let through, so if you accept B2/4/66 you'll get those (probably even 12/71) but if you lock your phone down to Sprint bands that's what you'll get. As an example, I've tended to select B41-only on my S20 if I'm in an area I know to have solid B41 (AKA where I live and nearby). That gets me significantly higher speeds than the default, which tends to sit on B66+n71. I got one roaming warning from this but latency and speeds are as if I was on the native network. Then if I head out I'll either turn everything on or select 25/26/41 as the radio in this phone is strong enough to sustain a Zoom video call where previously (Essential Phone) the only thing reliable was 1x. The system isn't perfect, and sometime the phone will fail to lock on a signal at all after enough band selection changes, but a reboot fixes that. I have the band selection app as one of my quick apps on the screen edge app selector, so swapping things around takes maybe 15 seconds and a few taps.
    • It works now. It can take up to 3 weeks to enable it though after changing over, but usually it's within a week. It used to be a fully manually process, with someone having to turn it on, but it seems more automated now. You will lose VoLTE if your internet cuts out. Used take a few days to get it back (again, maybe a manual process?). But when I tested this weekend I got it back within an hour. Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    • You can email the developers and ask for an enthusiast's license. Usually good for 6 months at a time.
    • No I really don't. Anyone with experience or info on my question above? Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...