Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

So how it sounds Sprint will have some steroid taking mutant network next year? So with all these network announcements this is a clear sign of increased spending on the network next year. I'm excited to the progress by the summer!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how it sounds Sprint will have some steroid taking mutant network next year? So with all these network announcements this is a clear sign of increased spending on the network next year. I'm excited to the progress by the summer!!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah 2017 is shaping up to be that year. Just hopefully they execute. Brong on the densification!!!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah 2017 is shaping up to be that year. Just hopefully they execute. Brong on the densification!!!

Right and that's the biggest. Numerous network projects in one year. Let's see how this pans out.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah 2017 is shaping up to be that year. Just hopefully they execute. Bring on the densification!!!

Didn't they same the same thing last year regarding densification? Maybe I'm wrong but I sure as hell haven't seen a new site here in my parts of New Jersey in years. Since it costs money I'm not holding my breathe.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't they same the same thing last year regarding densification? Maybe I'm wrong but I sure as hell haven't seen a new site here in my parts of New Jersey in years. Since it costs money I'm not holding my breathe.

NJ isn't good in a lot of areas for sprint...I have them but I know they will improve it will take time

 

Sent from my Lenovo PB2-690Y using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't they same the same thing last year regarding densification? Maybe I'm wrong but I sure as hell haven't seen a new site here in my parts of New Jersey in years. Since it costs money I'm not holding my breathe.

They weren't nearly as specific last time. This time they've named vendors and technologies. Plus we know that (assuming nothing terrible happens) they'll have a decent amount of cash this coming year.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They do give comparable coverage, but this change will make the footprint even closer to that of PCS. And of course 8T8R antennas are still being installed. Installation rates dropped for a while, but we are seeing more deployment now, especially in cities that either didn't see any or had a limited B41 rollout initially.

 

Why did the installation rates drop?

 

What was the change in focus?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Time on data will be less so I'm sure it balances itself out.

http://www.rcrwireless.com/20161213/carriers/sprint-lte-coverage-set-for-device-jolt-touts-nyc-small-cell-gains-tag2

 

"Sprint CTO John Saw noted that despite the increased transmitting power from within the device, there was virtually no impact on battery performance."

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did the installation rates drop?

 

What was the change in focus?

Money will be very important going forward. Just to make modifications to a tower site such as adding band 41, band 26 cost a lot of money a lot and it raises the rent as well. Im all for sprint getting better I like the underdog to win, but it will be tough for sprint to get this going any faster than it is now. There will still be markets that have higher priority then others.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money will be very important going forward. Just to make modifications to a tower site such as adding band 41, band 26 cost a lot of money a lot and it raises the rent as well. Im all for sprint getting better I like the underdog to win, but it will be tough for sprint to get this going any faster than it is now. There will still be markets that have higher priority then others.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

In your area, adding Band 26 won't cost much other than increasing backhaul for the tower since the site is already capable, just waiting for the spectrum to be clear.

 

Sent from my LG G5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your area, adding Band 26 won't cost much other than increasing backhaul for the tower since the site is already capable, just waiting for the spectrum to be clear.

 

Sent from my LG G5

So, what is holding Mexico from clearing it.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bingo. AFAIK debt was due. But they're (supposedly) past that.

 

Good point. Per the Sprint Financials Page (http://investors.sprint.com/financials/default.aspx), It seems like paying off the Clearwire 14.75% First-priority senior secured notes due 2016 (Maturing 12/1/2016) was a priority.

 

That's very expensive money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, what is holding Mexico from clearing it.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

I'm sure it's like anything else: Mexican companies and the Mexican government pushing back against the cost of compliance and bureaucracy. One way or another, it always comes back to money it seems.

 

FW had an article about this a while back: Sprint's 800 MHz LTE plans get boost after senators urge State Dept. to pressure Mexico on rebanding

 

At some point, it's about how much political capital you have and how far you're willing to go on it as a US National Policy. Here we are ~18 months after this article was published....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In your area, adding Band 26 won't cost much other than increasing backhaul for the tower since the site is already capable, just waiting for the spectrum to be clear.

 

Sent from my LG G5

So, then my market is behind 3 phase's. Band 41 which is coming next year. I don't think el paso has any clearwire equipment..so, I hope we launch with 3xca and 8T8r antennas. 2nd phase would be to clear band 26 and roll it out and phase 3 would be small cell deployment.

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure it's like anything else: Mexican companies and the Mexican government pushing back against the cost of compliance and bureaucracy. One way or another, it always comes back to money it seems.

 

FW had an article about this a while back: Sprint's 800 MHz LTE plans get boost after senators urge State Dept. to pressure Mexico on rebanding

 

At some point, it's about how much political capital you have and how far you're willing to go on it as a US National Policy.

At the end it's all about money

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end it's all about money

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

Yeah. But it's also about playing hardball or not. If 800 MHz was made a "National Priority" rising to the level of a presidential phone call, it would get done pronto.

 

Same for other projects that are slow going... Take this one for example in DC/MD/VA: Underground cell service comes to 1.1-mile stretch of Metro tunnel system; only 49.4 miles to go

 

Here's a PowerPoint that WMATA (the Transit agency) released a couple months ago:

 

https://www.wmata.com/about/board/meetings/board-pdfs/upload/101316_3BRadioandCellularInfrastructureReplacementUpdate.pdf

 

First areas to have cellular availability:

- Potomac Avenue to Stadium Armory by end of year

- Glenmont to Silver Spring by Spring of 2017

 

See how the schedule shows the project running pretty far into 2020?

 

The Economist actually uses the Big Mac as an economic indicator for measuring Purchase Power Parity, and calls it the "Big Mac Index". This provides a test of the extent to which market exchange rates result in goods costing the same in different countries.

 

Given the 800 MHz delays that Sprint has experienced and the DC Metro's sluggish pace on wireless deployment (a process that originally started in 2009 and was halted when the vendor, PowerWave, went bankrupt), I've coined a new term: "The Empire State Building Index", with this in mind:

 

The Empire State Building was completed on April 11, 1931, 12 days ahead of schedule, and just 410 days after construction commenced.

 

More than 7 Million Man Hours were put into the construction.

 

And this monumental feat was accomplished in the 1930's, with 1930's construction technology.

 

It's almost 2017, and we're supposed to believe it's going to take almost 4 years to run some cable through tunnels and place antennas over a linear track distance of 50 miles for cellular coverage? I don't buy it. Not for a second. Not to mention the fact that lacking wireless coverage throughout the underground transit system for the Nation's Capital is a matter of public safety and national security, it's an abject display of incompetence and bureaucracy that the project is scheduled to take 4 years for this amount of work. Who are we kidding here, seriously?

 

I also find this to be a corollary for what's going on with the 800 MHz rebanding and Mexico. If the State Department really wanted this done, it would be done. If the President really wanted it done, it would be done. It just doesn't rise to that level I guess.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. But it's also about playing hardball or not. If 800 MHz was made a "National Priority" rising to the level of a presidential phone call, it would get done pronto.

 

Same for other projects that are slow going... Take this one for example in DC/MD/VA: Underground cell service comes to 1.1-mile stretch of Metro tunnel system; only 49.4 miles to go

Here's a PowerPoint that WMATA (the Transit agency) released a couple months ago:

https://www.wmata.com/about/board/meetings/board-pdfs/upload/101316_3BRadioandCellularInfrastructureReplacementUpdate.pdf

First areas to have cellular availability:

- Potomac Avenue to Stadium Armory by end of year

- Glenmont to Silver Spring by Spring of 2017

See how the schedule shows the project running pretty far into 2020?

The Economist actually uses the Big Mac as an economic indicator for measuring Purchase Power Parity, and calls it the "Big Mac Index". This provides a test of the extent to which market exchange rates result in goods costing the same in different countries.

Given the 800 MHz delays that Sprint has experienced and the DC Metro's sluggish pace on wireless deployment (a process that originally started in 2009 and was halted when the vendor went bankrupt), I've coined a new term: "The Empire State Building Index", with this in mind:

The Empire State Building was completed on April 11, 1931, 12 days ahead of schedule, and just 410 days after construction commenced.

 

More than 7 Million Man Hours were put into the construction.

 

And this monumental feat was accomplished in the 1930's, with 1930's construction technology.

 

It's almost 2017, and we're supposed to believe it's going to take almost 4 more years to run some cable through tunnels and place antennas over a linear track distance of 50 miles for cellular coverage? I don't buy it. Not for a second. Not to mention the fact that lacking wireless coverage throughout the underground transit system for the Nation's Capital is a matter of public safety and national security, it's an abject display of incompetence that the project is scheduled to take 4 years. Who are we kidding here, seriously?

 

I find this to be a corollary for what's going on with the 800 MHz rebanding and Mexico. If the State Department really wanted this done, it would be done. If the President really wanted it done, it would be done. It just doesn't rise to that level I guess.

On this stretch doesn't any other carrier have LTE service ? This is what I have on 800mhz in el paso. Supposedly a guy named William m Holland is holding it and doesn't want to give it up and he can't seem to reach terms with sprint. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-15-488A1.pdf

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this stretch doesn't any other carrier have LTE service ? This is what I have on 800mhz in el paso. Supposedly a guy named William m Holland is holding it and doesn't want to give it up and he can't seem to reach terms with sprint. https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-15-488A1.pdf

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

In 1993, Metro entered into an agreement with Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) to install wireless communications in Metro`s underground stations and tunnels. This wireless network, currently owned and maintained by Verizon, only supports Verizon cell phones. Sprint phones must roam onto this network for access. TMobile and AT&T phones have no current access. In addition, the existing wireless infrastructure is old and does not have the technical sophistication to even provide Verizon`s own broadband data service offerings.

 

So that's interesting. Here's the most recent of Sprint’s Status Reports on 800 MHz Band Reconfiguration (December 1, 2016) Perhaps he's one of the people show on the map, unless it's already been adjudicated.

 

It's even gotten to the point where Sprint asked for a waiver to permit 800 MHz operation in AZ. (November 3, 2016)

 

According to a footnote in the filing: "Over the past few years, Sprint has been granted waivers in Florida, Northern California, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas – El Paso, Texas – San Antonio and Washington before 800 MHz band reconfiguration was complete in those Regions."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1993, Metro entered into an agreement with Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) to install wireless communications in Metro`s underground stations and tunnels. This wireless network, currently owned and maintained by Verizon, only supports Verizon cell phones. Sprint phones must roam onto this network for access. TMobile and AT&T phones have no current access. In addition, the existing wireless infrastructure is old and does not have the technical sophistication to even provide Verizon`s own broadband data service offerings.

 

So that's interesting. Here's the most recent of Sprint’s Status Reports on 800 MHz Band Reconfiguration (December 1, 2016) Perhaps he's one of the people show on the map, unless it's already been adjudicated.

 

It's even gotten to the point where Sprint asked for a waiver to permit 800 MHz operation in AZ. (November 3, 2016)

 

According to a footnote in the filing: "Over the past few years, Sprint has been granted waivers in Florida, Northern California, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas – El Paso, Texas – San Antonio and Washington before 800 MHz band reconfiguration was complete in those Regions."

So, the rebranding is complete.. it now just has to be cleared ?

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the rebranding is complete.. it now just has to be cleared ?

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

 

According to the filing:

 

"Band reconfiguration continues to make significant progress across the United States. All 800 MHz public safety and non-public safety licensees required to be retuned in a total of forty-three NPSPAC Regions and the U.S. Territories have fully completed 800 MHz band reconfiguration efforts."

 

"Currently only 12 Regions of the 55 NPSPAC Regions remain incomplete. Excluding the five Regions located within in the U.S. – Mexican Border Area , only two individual licensees (one public safety and one non-public safety) remain to fully complete 800 MHz band reconfiguration in the seven non-border NPSPAC areas of the United States."

 

.-.-.-.-.-

 

"Sprint appreciates the continuing opportunity to update the Commission on the substantial progress being made in 800 MHz band reconfiguration. We remain available to discuss this Report at the Bureau’s convenience. Sprint remains committed to completing this important initiative; however, as the information contained herein demonstrates, Sprint cannot complete 800 MHz band reconfiguration until all affected incumbent licensees complete their individual retuning activities."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone willing to help a fellow member out and his family...

 

Thanks

 

Help a family in need for the Holidays

 

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Es4gru%2Ecom%2Findex%2Ephp%3F%2Ftopic%2F7630-Help-a--family-in-need-for-the-Holidays&share_tid=7630&share_fid=38410&share_type=t

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 1993, Metro entered into an agreement with Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) to install wireless communications in Metro`s underground stations and tunnels. This wireless network, currently owned and maintained by Verizon, only supports Verizon cell phones. Sprint phones must roam onto this network for access. TMobile and AT&T phones have no current access. In addition, the existing wireless infrastructure is old and does not have the technical sophistication to even provide Verizon`s own broadband data service offerings.

 

So that's interesting. Here's the most recent of Sprint’s Status Reports on 800 MHz Band Reconfiguration (December 1, 2016) Perhaps he's one of the people show on the map, unless it's already been adjudicated.

 

It's even gotten to the point where Sprint asked for a waiver to permit 800 MHz operation in AZ. (November 3, 2016)

 

According to a footnote in the filing: "Over the past few years, Sprint has been granted waivers in Florida, Northern California, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas – El Paso, Texas – San Antonio and Washington before 800 MHz band reconfiguration was complete in those Regions."

Do we know the status of the waiver for AZ?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...