Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

I see they lifted up the hood on 3CA in 8 cities. Stuff we already knew but glad to see they announced it. I'm in the Columbus market and haven't experienced it yet on my 7plus but that could explain as to why I lost b41 while at home but who knows.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sprint has definitely turned the corner. What's incredible to me is how bloated Sprint was as a company. According to the release, Sprint has realized more than $1.1 Billion of year-to-date reductions in cost of services and selling, general and administrative expenses, with nearly $600 Million of the reduction coming in the fiscal second-quarter.

 

Apparently, the company remains on track to achieve its goal of a sustainable reduction of $2 Billion or more of run-rate operating expenses exiting fiscal year 2016 and has plans for further reductions in fiscal year 2017 and beyond.

 

Sprint's bloated cost structure was a huge liability, and kept the company from being truly competitive.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 8 of the Investor Presentation shows the percentage of Tri-band and CA-capable devices on Sprint.

 

http://s21.q4cdn.com/487940486/files/doc_presentations/2016/3_Fiscal-2Q16-Sprint-Quarterly-Investor-Update-FINAL.pdf

 

"Postpaid tri-band LTE phones represented 78 percent of the 25.7 million ending postpaid phone connection base compared to 54 percent at the end of the year-ago period and 73 percent at the end of the prior quarter. During the quarter, 94 percent of postpaid phones sold were tri-band."

 

"Postpaid carrier aggregation capable phones, which allow for higher data speeds, were 75 percent of postpaid phones sold during the quarter, increasing the number of these phones within the phone base to 42 percent."

 

The iPhone 7 release on Sprint really drove the CA percentage number up this quarter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has really held its own these last two quarters. Great to see 60M customers total again.

 

I'm confident Marcelo will cut another billion in operating cost as he pledged to do. The old sprint was run by a group of people whose business acumen had matured in a 90s wireline culture. They weren't ever going to see it much differently. Keep cutting the fat, Marcelo.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint has really held its own these last two quarters. Great to see 60M customers total again.

I'm confident Marcelo will cut another billion in operating cost as he pledged to do. The old sprint was run by a group of people whose business acumen had matured in a 90s wireline culture. They weren't ever going to see it much differently. Keep cutting the fat, Marcelo.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well said. Looking back now, it's remarkable what Marcelo and his team have accomplished so far.

 

Things were really bad across multiple fronts when he came on board due to poor management and execution. It's too easy to forget that.

 

Sprint is being run as SoftBank USA by Marcelo. That's exactly what's needed here.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint stocks taking a hit.

 

I think analysts still aren't buying their 'denisification' strategy because of the limited field results. I get they don't want to give away their strategy, but I think we can all agree it seems a bit stalled with at least one of their major small cell vendors (**cough** mobilitie **cough**).

 

Oh and the shorts may be trying to cover their arses.  :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mainly people want to see their service revenue stabilizes but so far it still decreases sequentially.  remember sprint does not make money selling phones, they make money selling their services.  so most if not all of the increase in revenue was from selling phones which at best breaks even or results in a loss.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paramount Pictures used to control a movies production, distribution and the exhibition (the theatre). In 1948, the Supreme Court ruled that level of vertical integration violated anti-trust. One could argue this merger could be a modern day version of this integration. Time Warner/ATT could in theory control HBO (production of a movie) and then only allow it to be shown on U-verse/ATT wireless devices.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Paramount_Pictures,_Inc.

If the regulators want to block this merger, they will find a reason.  Drag it up to the Supreme Court will only benefit the lawyers.  Democrats tend to be more anti-conglomerate mergers. Assuming Clinton will will the election, the chances for the merger will be less than under a Republican president.  It will be interesting to see how this will play out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming Clinton will will the election, the chances for the merger will be less than under a Republican president. It will be interesting to see how this will play out.

Obviously you haven't been following the election too closely.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I'm not sure if he edited his post but I thought he was saying Trump would be more accepting of a merger than Clinton. I may have read it wrong.

I read somewhere in the news that Trump said he would block the merger

 

Sent from my F3213 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously you haven't been following the election too cl

 

Well, I think most people stop following when they hear Trump speak and go straight to the polls.  It's sad to be a Republican, from Mitt to Trump in four years. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but shareholder don't like the fact that Sprint lowered there capex again

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

I called it two days ago. Their plan is to bluff network improvements (small cells cost less and will give use the improvements we need to maintain competitiveness), starve the network (lowering capex) to improve balance sheet (ie pay debt coming due). Short run good ( no default cash positions stay good), long run bad (network starts to have problems again). Markets are forward looking, they know capex is key to sprint maintaining subscriber growth in a way that will grow revenue and free cash flow.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I called it two days ago. Their plan is to bluff network improvements (small cells cost less and will give use the improvements we need to maintain competitiveness), starve the network (lowering capex) to improve balance sheet (ie pay debt coming do). Short run good ( no default cash positions stay good), long run bad (network starts to have problems again). Markets are forward looking, they know capex is key to sprint maintaining subscriber growth in a way that will grow revenue and free cash flow.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

The small cells would only work in markets where band 41 is substantially rolled out

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where has the network started deteriorating? Definitely haven't expected that in my area.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

There's lots of areas that lack upgrades, thus taking a hit on the network because of the 50% off deal. Tucson Yuma area is one. But I'm just one area. LTE speeds hoover around. .3mbps down.

 

Sent from my 2PS64 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...