Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Can we stop reposting (quoting) that humongous screenshot. Any more reposts and T-Mobile won't be the only one coming to a crawl.

 

:devil:

 

A baby certainly can crawl faster than those T-Mobile speeds. However, a baby still can't cry as loudly as John Legere, especially when free spectrum is at stake. They sure need that extra spectrum though at those speeds. Wow, that's slow!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was searching online for wireless news, and I discovered this very interesting bit of news in an article about a unique company selling unlimited MVNO services :

 

https://www.rcrwireless.com/20151130/carriers/sprint-unlimited-lte-data-remains-an-option-tag2

 

 

and the company's website, here :

 

http://www.unlimitedville.com

 

 

Note : The rates for their supposedly unlimited and unthrottled 4G LTE service, is $42.99 monthly using the Sprint network, and $198 monthly using the Verizon network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to this Milan guy it is an issue with oakla servers and no tmobile.

https://www.reddit.com/r/tmobile/comments/3uyhos/are_you_sure_your_cell_site_is_congested_bingeon/

 

Right....  I bet the test is even worse with Sensorly... 

 

I have an idea, let suse a TMUS app to measure data speed so TMUS can show the "true" speed of their network.  I bet Dr. Legere would not manipulate any of the data that the customer receives....  :o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint parent SoftBank considered a potential suitor for Yahoo's Internet business

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-parent-softbank-considered-potential-suitor-yahoos-internet-business/2015-12-02

 

There's a reason Yahoo is falling like a rock... Last thing SoftBank needs is this albatross.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint parent SoftBank considered a potential suitor for Yahoo's Internet business

 

Link: http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprint-parent-softbank-considered-potential-suitor-yahoos-internet-business/2015-12-02

 

There's a reason Yahoo is falling like a rock... Last thing SoftBank needs is this albatross.

giphy.gif

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was searching online for wireless news, and I discovered this very interesting bit of news in an article about a unique company selling unlimited MVNO services :

 

https://www.rcrwireless.com/20151130/carriers/sprint-unlimited-lte-data-remains-an-option-tag2

 

 

and the company's website, here :

 

http://www.unlimitedville.com

 

 

Note : The rates for their supposedly unlimited and unthrottled 4G LTE service, is $42.99 monthly using the Sprint network, and $198 monthly using the Verizon network.

 

Anyone try this yet?  Cheaper then Karma and getting a little roaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/atts-lurie-replaces-crickets-van-buskirk-john-dwyer-brands-new-prepaid-chie/2015-12-02

 

The misogyny on these comments by the Magentans. Good Lord almighty. :td:  :td:  :td:  

 

Not going into politics, but there seems to be a common theme with magentans. And ironically, they'll turn around and be SJWs. 

 

Not only do they believe in an entire dogmatic complex from their carrier politics alone, but this group are bigots too.

 

Must be pleasant people. 

Edited by cortney
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint needs to get the stores/reps aligned on the same terminology and messaging.

 

Sometimes Sprint needs to save itself from itself. The change to LTE Plus is adding another layer of content, and unless mentions of Spark are quickly removed and deprecated in all existing content, reps and customers could be confused.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint needs to get the stores/reps aligned on the same terminology and messaging.

 

Sometimes Sprint needs to save itself from itself. The change to LTE Plus is adding another layer of content, and unless mentions of Spark are quickly removed and deprecated in all existing content, reps and customers could be confused.

 

Spark hasn't been mentioned for a very long time and the tradition to this LTE plus moniker has been going on for months before the announcement with several of the new Sprint devices not having any Spark logo or anything of the sort in the software.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spark hasn't been mentioned for a very long time and the tradition to this LTE plus moniker has been going on for months before the announcement with several of the new Sprint devices not having any Spark logo or anything of the sort in the software.

True, but "Sprint Spark" is still used on the Coverage Map, under the Data Tab.

 

https://coverage.sprint.com

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but "Sprint Spark" is still used on the Coverage Map, under the Data Tab.

 

https://coverage.sprint.com

 

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

Agreed. Hopefully that coverage map page gets a total makeover. IMHO, Sprint should have ensured this was sorted out before it launched "LTE Plus" as a replacement for Spark.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need band 41 in every tower and more. It is simple as that. The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it. If you have a city with 1000 towers and you put band 41 only 500 towers that won't cut it.

 

 

They have to over match and over power the others three. They have the spectrum to do it.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need band 41 in every tower and more. It is simple as that. The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it. If you have a city with 1000 towers and you put band 41 only 500 towers that won't cut it.

They have to over match and over power the others three. They have the spectrum to do it.

They have the Spectrum, but even with SoftBank's backing, Sprint doesn't have the gobs of money that AT&T/Verizon do, so it can't just throw money shotgun style at its network. It has to be smart. I trust Marcelo and his new team will get it done right this time. Sprint needs to touch every tower, but it needs to target the most important ones first.
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the one thing that I am confused as to why they haven't fixed yet. Maybe they're trying to figure out a way to differ between non-CA and CA areas on the map and market them.

 

I still can't stress how they need to also figure out how to make a new map. They can keep the old one available for people who like it so much. But I hope they're working a whole new bigger, cleaner map besides differentiation.

 

That needs to be Sprint's 2016 resolution: Clean up the site UI, clean up old links and areas of site. Please

Edited by cortney
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still can't stress how they need to also figure out how to make a new map. They can keep the old one available for people who like it so much. But I hope they're working a whole new bigger, cleaner map besides differentiation.

 

That needs to be Sprint's 2016 resolution: Clean up the site UI, clean up old links and areas of site. Please!

*ahem*

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/7337-ultimate-sprint-coverage-map/

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 120mhz of 2.5ghz spectrum is their only advantage over the others and they need to go further with it.

It's really not as big of an advantage as they make it out to be. Verizon has 90 MHz of LTE on the air *today* across three carriers on almost every site in my city, with a site density high enough that they use narrow-beam antennas everywhere, and they haven't even started their AWS-3 overlay yet. AT&T has 50-70 MHZ on the air across 2-3 LTE carriers with an even higher site density and is overlaying another carrier right now (and this is actually a spectrum-constrained market for them as they have no AWS here). Everyone but Sprint is already running 4x2 MIMO on their high-band spectrum (although Sprint has at least upgraded to hardware capable of it now).

 

Sprint isn't planning to do more than 3x20 MHz of band 41 on most sites, putting them at 80 MHz (plus any additional band 25 carriers) on most tri-band sites in the *future*. And with the lowest average site density of the top 4 carriers, you can see why small cells are so important to them.

 

Now, before I get responses from people who think I just called band 41 worthless, please re-read the first sentence of my post. All I'm saying is that the amount doesn't necessarily make it the acclaimed treasure trove.

 

The biggest advantage that spectrum will probably offer is its ability to be shifted to downlink-only (thanks to TDD) for carrier aggregation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spark logo and name will linger for a bit. I still have it on my phone when it boots up.  I keep up on things and can't tell you what the new name means.  Does that mean carrier aggregation and if so how much of the market.   Beam... 8T8R ?   A lot of knowledge to have to sell because their technology had to be sold.    People just need to experience it working.  

Edited by Calvin200
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...