Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Sprint's new $70/month Unlimited Plan includes 3 GB of tethering and has a 23 GB usage threshold at which de-prioritization applies.

 

Full Details Here: http://support.sprint.com/support/article/FAQs_about_Sprint_60_Unlimited_Plan/e8bc59f3-1893-4482-895a-38b7ed69ab65#!/

 

Sprint's new Unlimited Family pricing is $70/month for first line and $60/month for lines 2-5.

 

EDIT: Per the FAQ you can have up to 10 lines on this plan. Perhaps the website only supports ordering a max of 5 lines?

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's new $70/month Unlimited Plan includes 3 GB of tethering and has a 23 GB usage threshold at which de-prioritization applies.

 

Full Details Here: http://support.sprint.com/support/article/FAQs_about_Sprint_60_Unlimited_Plan/e8bc59f3-1893-4482-895a-38b7ed69ab65#!/

 

Sprint's new Unlimited Family pricing is $70/month for first line and $60/month for lines 2-5.

Good:  3 GB mobile hotspot is included

Bad:  Off-network roaming is limited to 100MB

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It usually takes a while to find executives. It's not like Sprint will put the job on Monster.com and have a glut of applicants.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Normally, yes. Yet, considering the history of Sprint's recent past Executive resignations, Sprint has announced replacements together, or actually I should say Softbank, since it seems these are people relating to them more than Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's new $70/month Unlimited Plan includes 3 GB of tethering and has a 23 GB usage threshold at which de-prioritization applies.

 

Full Details Here: http://support.sprint.com/support/article/FAQs_about_Sprint_60_Unlimited_Plan/e8bc59f3-1893-4482-895a-38b7ed69ab65#!/

 

Sprint's new Unlimited Family pricing is $70/month for first line and $60/month for lines 2-5.

 

EDIT: Per the FAQ you can have up to 10 lines on this plan. Perhaps the website only supports ordering a max of 5 lines?

I'm totally fine with a 23GB threshold to de-prioritize ONLY in congested areas.  That sounds more than reasonable to me.

 

I also like the 3GB of tethering.  Wish it would have stayed at $60, but you can't have everything.  :-)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad of a plan at all. More of an offering than my current my way plan but I think I'll hair stick with my current plan. But these plans are a sign of the condition of the network.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't odd at all.

Perhaps in your opinion, it isn't. Although, I related how in the past, Sprint/Softbank announced replacements along when there were resignations, this one seems quite a bit different. It is odd considering that it hasn't followed that recent track record.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez, for an unlimited data family plan, with 5 lines, you're looking at 70 + 60 + 60 + 60 + 60 = $310, and this doesn't even cover device subsidy!!!  With a 5 person family plan, all with new phone leases, you're looking at over ~$440/month after taxes on Sprint.  The ED 1500 is roughly about ~$45-$50 per line, and include device subsidy.  The legacy customers should really feel good now for sticking around with Sprint this long.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there any other legacy holdover folks left?

While I can't answer that question since I don't know, you brought up an interesting issue I was thinking of when I made my comment of this being odd, since it seems this guy who resigned was on that old board for a short time, which is strange he wasn't immediately replaced by someone else as the past shows an almost "planned" aspect to the resignations.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez, for an unlimited data family plan, with 5 lines, you're looking at 70 + 60 + 60 + 60 + 60 = $310, and this doesn't even cover device subsidy!!! With a 5 person family plan, all with new phone leases, you're looking at over ~$440/month after taxes on Sprint. The ED 1500 is roughly about ~$45-$50 per line, and include device subsidy. The legacy customers should really feel good now for sticking around with Sprint this long.

I agree, Ascertion.

 

The Everything Data Plan is a great plan which these new plans are so much more expensive than, it really shows how much rates have increased.

 

What I'm wondering, though I certainly hope this does not happen, is if Sprint will raise the rates on the Everything Data Plan, similar to how Verizon raised rates on their unlimited data.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, Ascertion.

The Everything Data Plan is a great plan which these new plans are so much more expensive than, it really shows how much rates have increased.

What I'm wondering, though I certainly hope this does not happen, is if Sprint will raise the rates on the Everything Data Plan, similar to how Verizon raised rates on their unlimited data.

If they did that, they would risk losing their most loyal customers. Sprint can't afford to do that.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they did that, they would risk losing their most loyal customers. Sprint can't afford to do that.

Hopefully Sprint doesn't change it. Besides, I know of some people who are on lines belonging to the main account holder who really depend on this plan, considering the rates.

 

Surely there is an issue with overusage of data in ways which violate T.O.S., etc which need to be dealt with, and networks are being clogged by data. Yet, raising the rates so high actually is hurting people who are mid-range users, say around 10gb-15gb of data Monthly, who don't necessarily use that data for entertainment, but also can't afford the high overage rates in cheaper plans MVNOs offer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they did that, they would risk losing their most loyal customers. Sprint can't afford to do that.

I forgot to add in my prior response, from what I've read online there seems to be more people still on Everything Data with Sprint than there are on unlimited data with Verizon. So my comparison between them before wasn't exactly accurate to use in this situation.

 

Besides, Sprint isn't exactly in the best shape where they can afford to upset their loyal customers, which I acknowledge. Although I think Sprint ought to allow legacy customers to get on new promos, etc., as that has been a common complaint I've read online.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Saw (Sprint CTO) just posted this: Protecting the 97%

This is a nice detail that shouldn't go unnoticed..

 

"Prioritization is applied or removed every 20 milliseconds. And performance for the affected customer returns to normal as soon as traffic on the cell site also returns to normal, or the customer moves to a non-constrained site."

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a nice detail that shouldn't go unnoticed..

 

"Prioritization is applied or removed every 20 milliseconds. And performance for the affected customer returns to normal as soon as traffic on the cell site also returns to normal, or the customer moves to a non-constrained site."[/size]

Agreed. But this shouldn't last for the rest of the billing cycle. Someone using 23 GB in San Francisco has no localized effect on someone using 23 GB in Chicago. Having it apply for the remainder of the bill cycle means that even if someone travels to a new area without congestion, this de-prioritization tag follows them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. But this shouldn't last for the rest of the billing cycle. Someone using 23 GB in San Francisco has no localized effect on someone using 23 GB in Chicago. Having it apply for the remainder of the bill cycle means that even if someone travels to a new area without congestion, this de-prioritization tag follows them.

 

If someone travels to a new area that's not congested, how and why would the de-priortization tag affect them?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly, if a user is truly abusing the network, kick them off.  Make them suffer with Magenta.

 

And if they have a plan with phone subsidies, too, AJ will come and personally remove them! :)

 

bouncer-o.gif

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. But this shouldn't last for the rest of the billing cycle. Someone using 23 GB in San Francisco has no localized effect on someone using 23 GB in Chicago. Having it apply for the remainder of the bill cycle means that even if someone travels to a new area without congestion, this de-prioritization tag follows them.

I think this is an immensely fair way of network management. It shouldn't matter if you used 23 gigs in one location and then you are in another. You've utilized a lot of data on sprint's network and if you are on a busy site others who haven't consumed as much data should not see their experience suffer because of a small fraction of users (ps I am part of the three percent). It only applies to busy sites and times and only after you've consumed what is a large amount of data compared to others in the sprint user base.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone travels to a new area that's not congested, how and why would the de-priortization tag affect them?

Because it's for the remainder of the bill cycle and if a tower becomes congested, they're affected, even though their usage in that new location could be low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's for the remainder of the bill cycle.

 

That doesn't actually answer the question though. I'll rephrase slightly: If someone travels to a new area that's not congested, how and why would the de-priortization tag affect their service?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...