Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

Except they'll say they suck solely based on the data speed. Happened to me many times.  Nobody puts any credit to reliability or call/text performance.

 

Sprint didn't fare well at all in Riverside.  The data score is atrocious.

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/riverside-ca/2015/1H

 

No 800 1x or LTE ✓

Majority of sites aren't live with LTE of any type ✓

Minimal clear B41 coverage ✓

Lack of 8T8R 2.5 Equipment Deployed ✓

Alcatel-Lucent land ✓

 

Sounds about right, 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No 800 1x or LTE ✓

Majority of sites aren't live with LTE of any type ✓

Minimal clear B41 coverage ✓

Lack of 8T8R 2.5 Equipment Deployed ✓

Alcatel-Lucent land ✓

 

Sounds about right,

Vegas is Alcatel-Lucent land, and faring far better than Riverside. My guess is incompetent planning departments and permit applications missing data.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No 800 1x or LTE ✓

Majority of sites aren't live with LTE of any type ✓

Minimal clear B41 coverage ✓

Lack of 8T8R 2.5 Equipment Deployed ✓

Alcatel-Lucent land ✓

 

Sounds about right,

I know why it's bad, but that doesn't mean they get a free pass. All other major carriers did exceptionally well there. What's Sprint's excuse for being so far behind?

 

Alcatel Lucent isn't as bad as some make it seem. NYC, and Boston are perfect examples. Little to no screw ups whatsoever.

Let's not forget nobody is as bad as Ericsson.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ericsson has improved in St. Louis pretty dramatically. And the Atlanta test shows they have improved there as well. Maybe the new engineering people from Japan are getting results?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcatel Lucent isn't as bad as some make it seem. NYC, and Boston are perfect examples. Little to no screw ups whatsoever.

Phoenix is an AL market and they have been painfully slow and a handful of site have no upgrades at all and no sign they will be upgraded. That combined with the numerous 3G only sites and maricopa counties squatting on band 26 ( no AL fault to be fair) leaves large gaps in lte coverage. AL has been horrible here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phoenix is an AL market and they have been painfully slow and a handful of site have no upgrades at all and no sign they will be upgraded. That combined with the numerous 3G only sites and maricopa counties squatting on band 26 ( no AL fault to be fair) leaves large gaps in lte coverage. AL has been horrible here.

 

As you said, Band 26 squatting isn't their fault. 3G-Only sites are likely that way because of backhaul and such. No upgrades doesn't mean they won't upgrade it. That's not a fair assumption at all. A lot of sites in NYC are just as you described however, for each poor site, there exists 10-20 more that are excellent.

 

Judging from the completed maps, there doesn't seem to be nearly as many 3G sites as I had expected while writing the first part.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not forget nobody is as bad as Ericsson.

 

Only those paste eaters (Ericsson) can take a perfectly functioning site (work done by Alcatel Lucent and it contractors) and screw up half the sectors six month later and get paid for it while claiming "they are managing the network".

 

paste.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if this is indicative of poor planning on Alcatel-Lucent's part, but I've come across several current legacy sites in Los Angeles that had permits approved so long ago that they have now expired.  One site had 2 changes to the subcontractor on the permit and it still expired without any work having been completed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if this is indicative of poor planning on Alcatel-Lucent's part, but I've come across several current legacy sites in Los Angeles that had permits approved so long ago that they have now expired. One site had 2 changes to the subcontractor on the permit and it still expired without any work having been completed.

Not ALU entirely. It's called contractors being hired for too many sites at a time, that they just have too much to do and sites get neglected and forgot about. Happened a number of times in Vegas.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not ALU entirely. It's called contractors being hired for too many sites at a time, that they just have too much to do and sites get neglected and forgot about. Happened a number of times in Vegas.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 6+ using Tapatalk 3.1.1

 

Same thing for NYC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm currently kind of busy but a short search into the forums could probably show you what I'm talking about. Or maybe someone in Ericsson territory will step in.

I see... Thanks for sharing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm currently kind of busy but a short search into the forums could probably show you what I'm talking about. Or maybe someone in Ericsson territory will step in.

 

I can't think of any examples in my part of Ericsson land.

 

Every OEM has had it's share of problems.

 

Some parts of Ericsson's market share have had management issues. But here, they have done an excellent job.

 

Some parts of ALUs market share have had management issues. Others have been fantastic. So this blanket blame game doesn't really work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/austin-tx/2014/2H

 

 

So a Tie for the big 2 and Sprint in 4th but a large jump forward from 1st half 2014.

Overall score from 86.9 to 94.4 

Average DL from 2.4 to 8.4

 

Most importantly what I was hearing from friends turned out to be true. T-Mobile is slowing down here: "T-Mobile’s median download speed decreased from 17.6 Mbps to 13.4 Mbps." Still faster than Sprint but interesting nonetheless. Also AT&T has sped up while Verizon has lost the 1st place rank in speed which was unexpected. Many of my AT&T friends complained about slower service in some areas.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/aus-airport/2014/2H

 

Sprint remains completely and utterly useless at the Airport.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/austin-tx/2014/2H

 

 

So a Tie for the big 2 and Sprint in 4th but a large jump forward from 1st half 2014.

Overall score from 86.9 to 94.4 

Average DL from 2.4 to 8.4

 

Most importantly what I was hearing from friends turned out to be true. T-Mobile is slowing down here: "T-Mobile’s median download speed decreased from 17.6 Mbps to 13.4 Mbps." Still faster than Sprint but interesting nonetheless. Also AT&T has sped up while Verizon has lost the 1st place rank in speed which was unexpected. Many of my AT&T friends complained about slower service in some areas.

 

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/aus-airport/2014/2H

 

Sprint remains completely and utterly useless at the Airport.

 

In Austin tmo has (downlink):

 

Total: 41 MHz Travis County, TX
AWS: 10|10 MHz
PCS: 5|10 MHz
700A: 6 MHz

 

 

 

They're probably using 10x10 for lte and 10x10 for hspa42

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a lot of people in Ericsson land have been experiencing.

 

If I remember correctly I think a lot of the Ericsson bashing came from Digiblur. Which was a long time ago...

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.cnet.com/news/sprint-ceo-t-mobile-in-for-a-rude-awakening-in-network-battle/

 

Marcelo lets action speak in regards to root metrics scores. "I think Legere is in for a rude awakening when new scores come out about network performance," We all know this was bound to happen, and I think this year we will see much better scores.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...