Jump to content

Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread


joshuam

Recommended Posts

 

Marcelo Claure - CEO

And an area that we need to improve is retention. We need to get better at making sure that our customers are staying. Some of that will happen because our network is getting better. So that will happen naturally, but we can do a better job of letting our customer know our value.

And lastly, we’re going to be extremely focused on building our network that we’re going to be disciplined on the way I want that network to be built. Yes, we can run speed test that will do 50, 60 megabits per second, and if we do 3x carrier aggregation, we’ll do 100, 120. I’m not interested in that. I’m interested in providing consistency to our customers, because our customers again are not leaving because I don’t deliver 120 megabits per second. Our customers are leaving because they are lacking coverage in a certain place.

 

 

FINALLY! Someone Who Get's It. 

 

I can't wait to see how Marketing/Branding turns around for Sprint. Hopefully this will be a whole NEW ball game. 

  • Like 17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FINALLY! Someone Who Get's It.

 

I can't wait to see how Marketing/Branding turns around for Sprint. Hopefully this will be a whole NEW ball game.

110% on mark

 

 

Reliability of network is key.

 

At least in my area between the constant 1x, 3G to LTE dance that occurs & the new double 30gb promotion at att it's making me want to switch again. But I don't want to.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

110% on mark

 

 

Reliability of network is key.

 

At least in my area between the constant 1x, 3G to LTE dance that occurs & the new double 30gb promotion at att it's making me want to switch again. But I don't want to.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I remember when I first started in this forum thousands of years ago, I concluded that the most important thing to me would be consistency and reliability. I have yet to change my opinion on that, and am so happy that the CEO shares my view.

 

Like he said. I don't care if I can get download speeds of 100 Mbps. If it's not consistent throughout, it's not worth my money. Make sure everyone has reliable and consistent service first, then worry about making it so damn fast your eyeballs explode.

 

My 2.5 cents... Haha. get it, 2.5....

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 on Crapatalk

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One would think that should have been the case long ago.  Whats the purpose of having 100 megabits speeds. Then walking two feet to the left and having no service.  They also need to turn up the power on 1900 Lte. Its just too weak. Two blocks away from the Tower and barely be hanging onto a signal.  Well at least now the CEO is aware of the problem.   

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"The brand was very weak. And it continues to be very weak," Claure admitted. "It's been a very long time since the brand stood for something."

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/sprints-claure-you-aint-seen-nothing-yet-terms-value-message/2014-11-12

 

YES! Marcelo - Preach! Finally my Cries about Marketing have been heard. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One would think that should have been the case long ago.  Whats the purpose of having 100 megabits speeds. Then walking two feet to the left and having no service.  They also need to turn up the power on 1900 Lte. Its just too weak. Two blocks away from the Tower and barely be hanging onto a signal.  Well at least now the CEO is aware of the problem.   

The power output is my major gripe.  Every other carrier, even on higher frequencies have better signal around the tower than Sprint.  T-Mobile's LTE here stretches further than Sprints in almost every case.  (Sprint's PCS vs T-Mobile's AWS.)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its "turning up the power" all apart of Optimization? and we're still waiting on NYC to be Optimized, correct? 

Yes, the power output plays a huge part in optimization.  When LTE is in testing (any band), and it gives weak results, it's more than likely them altering the power output for it.  Robert even stated in a post that Samsung, when testing B26 on newer sites, they turn it on for the public, but keep the power output low to conserve energy (cash), then turn it on in clusters.  Not sure how Ericsson or Alcatel do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually super happy with Sprint in Austin. I just need to get my wife a triband phone so she can be as happy as I am. Her iphone 5 really can't give her the full experience as she is stuck on the slower sprint 1900 mhz LTE.

 

 

I really wish Sprint would give current customers with non-triband devices a $50 or $100 credit or something to switch to a new triband phone. I think it would go a long way in terms of retention and also overall network performance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert even stated in a post that Samsung, when testing B26 on newer sites, they turn it on for the public, but keep the power output low to conserve energy (cash), then turn it on in clusters. Not sure how Ericsson or Alcatel do it.

No.

 

Band 26 is activated at low power because they need to optimize it correctly with drive testers and engineers versed in the 800mhz frequency.

 

It takes multiple tries and many months and there's a backlog due to lack of qualified engineers and thousands of sites in que.

 

Low power levels prevent interference issues due to improperly configured cells and asisists in offload capacity as it is an additional 5mhz lte carrier subscribers can use.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm actually super happy with Sprint in Austin. I just need to get my wife a triband phone so she can be as happy as I am. Her iphone 5 really can't give her the full experience as she is stuck on the slower sprint 1900 mhz LTE.

 

 

I really wish Sprint would give current customers with non-triband devices a $50 or $100 credit or something to switch to a new triband phone. I think it would go a long way in terms of retention and also overall network performance.

What they should do is push the upgrade up (and have her in exchange trade her phone in) to get upgrade eligibility back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, the power output plays a huge part in optimization. When LTE is in testing (any band), and it gives weak results, it's more than likely them altering the power output for it. Robert even stated in a post that Samsung, when testing B26 on newer sites, they turn it on for the public, but keep the power output low to conserve energy (cash), then turn it on in clusters. Not sure how Ericsson or Alcatel do it.

In my area optimization for 800 and 1900 lte was completed 4-6 months ago. Can't stay on lte or even 3G - very sporadic sadly.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What they should do is push the upgrade up (and have her in exchange trade her phone in) to get upgrade eligibility back.

I'm on Family share (technically a "new" customer) so it wouldn't help me necessarily. I'll probably be getting her an iphone 6 for Christmas at any rate but there are tons of Sprint customers on older phones that complain about coverage and speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my area optimization for 800 and 1900 lte was completed 4-6 months ago. Can't stay on lte or even 3G - very sporadic sadly.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No optimization here for B26, every time I connect to it (on the same tower) the signal is a lot worse and data is almost unusable.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 running Android 5.0 Lollipop

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

 

Band 26 is activated at low power because they need to optimize it correctly with drive testers and engineers versed in the 800mhz frequency.

 

It takes multiple tries and many months and there's a backlog due to lack of qualified engineers and thousands of sites in que.

 

Low power levels prevent interference issues due to improperly configured cells and asisists in offload capacity as it is an additional 5mhz lte carrier subscribers can use.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

I wish I had a contact because I'd be interested I pursuing a career as a technician optimizing cell sites.

 

Sent from my LG-LS980

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The power output is my major gripe.  Every other carrier, even on higher frequencies have better signal around the tower than Sprint.  T-Mobile's LTE here stretches further than Sprints in almost every case.  (Sprint's PCS vs T-Mobile's AWS.)

That's actually my only gripe about Sprint LTE too. I just wish that they'd increase power to have a better signal in general.

 

Unless optimization has yet to occur, I highly doubt that increasing base station ERP/EIRP would have the desired effect.  Remember that wireless coverage is not about broadcasting a downlink signal but rather about balancing a link budget between downlink and uplink signals.  In coverage areas where Sprint LTE signal is weak, I also typically see my handset slamming up against its 23 dBm conducted power limiter.  At that point, increasing the downlink ERP/EIRP would not help the uplink, which is already at the verge of failure.

 

Like it or not, LTE is a fragile airlink.  And that is true for all operators and bands.  For example, VZW has overlaid its entire network with band 13 LTE 750.  That is a lower frequency band than any of VZW's CDMA2000 band classes, hence has path loss advantages.  But take a sample of VZW network discussion somewhere online, and note how many users post about where they still fall back to "3G."  Absent higher EIRP at both the base station and the handset, the only fix for that fallback "problem" is increased site density.

 

AJ

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless optimization has yet to occur, I highly doubt that increasing base station EIRP would have the desired effect. Remember that wireless coverage is not about broadcasting a downlink signal but rather balancing a link budget between downlink and uplink signals. In coverage areas where Sprint LTE signal is weak, I also typically see my handset slamming up against its 23 dBm conducted power limiter. At that point, increasing the downlink EIRP would not help the uplink, which is already at the verge of failure.

 

Like it or not, LTE is a fragile airlink. And that is true for all operators and bands. For example, VZW has overlaid its entire network with band 13 LTE 750. That is a lower frequency band than any of VZW's CDMA2000 band classes, hence has path loss advantages. But take a sample of VZW network discussion somewhere online, and note how many users post about where they still fall back to "3G." Absent higher EIRP at both the base station and the handset, the only fix for that fallback "problem" is increased site density.

 

AJ

very good info.

 

I'd be less upset if AT&T or VZW had the same issues where I live. That sprint does.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FINALLY! Someone Who Get's It. 

 

I can't wait to see how Marketing/Branding turns around for Sprint. Hopefully this will be a whole NEW ball game. 

 

Remember this moment and then let us know where you see a change. Hopefully your wait will be less than mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/new-haven-ct

 

Marcelo's dream come true. Average speeds went from 1Mbps to 10Mbps and their reliability score is a 99.0. They tied for first with Verizon and AT&T in reliability, but it was still higher than both in the raw score.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.rootmetrics.com/us/rsr/new-haven-ct

 

Marcelo's dream come true. Average speeds went from 1Mbps to 10Mbps and their reliability score is a 99.0. They tied for first with Verizon and AT&T in reliability, but it was still higher than both in the raw score.

 

 

How is it that when the scores are (S) 98.7 - (V) 97.2 - (A) 96.4, it's a three way tie

 

But when they are (A) 96.6 - (V) 95.6 - (S) 95.6, AT&T is the clear winner? That seems fishy to me.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...