Jump to content

1.9 GHz LTE overload question


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

The statements in this thread don't feel accurate to me. Sending data over radio waves involves putting a sequence of symbols on the available channel space and transmitting them long enough for the receiver to determine what symbol is being sent. How long a single symbol needs to be sent is dependent upon the modulation frequency, as it should take time, measured in cycles, for the receiver to identify when the frequency and phase of a modulated signal has been changed to. Therefore, doubling the modulation frequency should allow you to shove twice as many symbols on the channel per second, and therefore twice the data per second. What is special about cellular telephony that this is not the case? 

 

Cellular telephony is not unique, and the reasoning is the same for any modulated signal, and that is the frequency on which the symbols are being transmitted at is not at all related to the frequency at which the symbols are being transmitted.

 

One way to think of it (and this is a gross oversimplification, but may help) if I send data at 1hz using a 1000hz radio wave, then for each symbol,  I use 1000 cycles of radiowaves.  If I increase the data rate to 10 hz, each symbol would use 100 cycles of radiowaves, or if I change the radio wave to 2000hz, then each symbol at 10 hz would use 200 cycles of radio wave.

When I went from 1hz data to 10hz data, I increased the data capacity by 10fold, but in the second case where I doubled the radio frequency, there was no change in data capacity.

 

This scales up and in general, the carrier frequency (the base radio signal) is much much higher than the data rate (essentially, the bandwidth)

 

The example you used would only really apply in cases where the bandwidth is equal to the frequency.  If I'm transmitting data at 1 hz using a 1hz radiowave, then each cycle contains one unit of data, but the only limitation there is the bandwidth can't be greater than the frequency.

 

So with band 25 and 26, the bandwidth or data rate is not changed, but the frequency is.  

 

In the real world, it's a bit more complicated, and the modulation methods, noise, coverage and everything else plays a big role in how far and fast things go, but the basics of frequency and bandwidth apply to all of them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...