Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 24 July 2011

 

 

What are Protection Sites?

by Sprint 4G Rollout Updates on Sunday, July 24, 2011 at 10:01am

 

 

You keep reading around S4GRU about "Protection Sites." But what are protection sites, you ask?

 

Sprint broadcasts it's 4G WiMax signal on 2.5GHz-2.65GHz (along with it's partner Clear/Clearwire). That's up to 150MHz of spectrum (variable by market). More than any other carrier in the country.

 

Before 2007, 2.5GHz-2.65GHz was allocated by the FCC as EBS and BRS spectrum (Educational Broadband Service/Broadcast Radio Service). EBS was used by any public education organization free of charge on a first come, first served basis. However, this spectrum was relatively little used. At it's peak, only 100 education institutions actually utilized the spectrum for educational purposes. Most actually leased their spectrum to Clearwire for their pre-WiMax network.

 

This was deemed a huge waste of spectrum by the FCC (and it was). When you consider the entire population of the U.S. and the total data capacity of the EBS spectrum, it was not even 1/100th of 1% utilized!

 

In 2004, the FCC decided to reallocate the EBS/BRS spectrum for mobile internet and gave notice to the EBS/BRS license holders that in 2007 they would be repurposing the spectrum. EBS license holders could reapply with the broadband carriers in the 2007 reallotment. It was a confusing mess. In reality in the way it was structured, EBS spectrum winners were subleasing spectrum from the schools and universities. BRS spectrum licenses were purchased outright.

 

In 2007 the EBS spectrum went out for bid. Two bidders ended up with the lion's share of the 150MHz of spectrum...Sprint and Clearwire. Sprint ending up with 60MHz of nationwide coverage. Clearwire with 90MHz of nationwide coverage. One of the conditions to the bidders is a clause called "Minimum Coverage Standards."

 

For the EBS Spectrum, the FCC breaks up the 50 States and U.S. Territories into approx. 500 Basic Trading Areas, or BTA's (In other wireless spectrum, they use CMA's, or Cellular Market Areas). They use these to manage licenses for EBS spectrum. Licenses for each BTA are good for 10 years upon issuance. At 10 year intervals, they need to be renewed. At renewal, service provided is evaluated by the FCC. 99% of all renewals are approved. Some carriers have spectrum in all the BTA's (or CMA's). Some only have regions. Some have regions in one set of spectrum and other regions in other sections. It can be very messy and confusing to track FCC licenses.

 

In 2008, Sprint and Clearwire received FCC approval and merged their EBS/BRS spectrum holdings into a singular holding of the 150MHz block and formed the joint-venture company Clear.

 

Back to the Minimum Coverage Standards. The FCC mandated that a minimally acceptable amount of coverage be in every BTA by May 1, 2011. Clearwire started rolling out protection sites in earnest in early 2011. However, did not meet the Minimum Coverage Standards in all BTA's by May 1st, and started filing for extensions.

 

FROM CLEARWIRE 2010 ANNUAL REPORT:

 

The FCC also clarified the procedure by which BRS and EBS licensees must demonstrate minimum acceptable service, and required them to demonstrate minimum service by May 1, 2011. Minimum service showings demonstrate to the FCC that a licensee is not warehousing spectrum. If a BRS or EBS licensee fails to demonstrate minimum
service by May 1, 2011, its license may be canceled and made available for re-licensing.

 

For our spectrum, we
believe that we will satisfy the substantial service requirements for all owned and leased licenses associated with
each of our commercially launched markets, whether Pre-4G or 4G. For licenses covering areas outside of our
commercially launched markets, we are in the process of executing a (Protection Site Plan) to comply with the minimum service requirement by the deadline. Our ability, however, to meet the minimum service deadline for every owned or leased license in areas outside of our launched markets is uncertain, and we will likely seek waivers or extensions of the deadline from the FCC in some circumstances.

 

Any winning bidder who did not provide minimally acceptable service within a BTA, will be subject to having the license revoked and the original license holder will be unable to ever regain it.

 

This is very strong language about revocation. Minimum acceptable coverage to the FCC for this spectrum is:

  • 30% of the BTA's Population Has Useable Service, or...
  • 50% of the Geographical Area (Square Mileage) of the BTA has Useable Service.

If one of these two items is met, then the license holder has met the Minimum Acceptable Coverage Standards required by the FCC for the EBS spectrum.

 

293311_274152022602243_8186553_n.jpg

Sprint/Clear 4G Basic Trading Area (BTA) Map showing all 500 BTA's in the U.S. The ones in green have at least (1) Sprint/Clear 4G tower in operation. The ones in white have no Clearwire service in operation.

 

In the map above, you can see all the 500 BTA's in the United States. What Sprint/Clear have decided was to put up at least one tower every in every BTA in the country. So in 2011, they broke from the conventional rollout. They are deploying "Protection Sites" in all the BTA's. These are sites intended to keep the FCC at bay with the intention of trying to meet minimum acceptable service to maintain licensing.

 

It appears that in larger population BTA's (250k+), they are deploying more than one protection site to meet the 30% population coverage minimum.

 

Sprint/Clear are well on their way to being complete with the BTA Protection Site rollout before the end of 2011. They are averaging about 7 to 10 towers per week. So largely the areas in white will all be filled in green in short order. There will be a few exceptions. BTA's that have Clearwire's Pre-WiMax technology (like Reno, Dayton and Anchorage) will not receive protection sites. They already meet the FCC Minimum Coverage Requirements as the Pre-WiMax is broadcast on the same 2.5GHz spectrum.

 

Most likely, the FCC will not give Sprint/Clear any grief over the minimum service clauses because they are attempting to do something. The clause is largely to prevent people from buying the spectrum and just sitting on it as an investment. The FCC really wants it just to be used. Most likely, the extension for Minimum Coverages will be given.

 

The service requirements on the 700MHz spectrum are far more stringent than they were on the 2.5GHz spectrum. Verizon, AT&T and MetroPCS have less time to roll out. And the terminology used in it's FCC licensing doesn't have vague words like "minimum acceptable", but rather "substantial coverage."

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

No need for protection sites in CMH. Protection sites are set up in markets where Clearwire doesn't have service in order to "protect" their license from being revoked by the FCC. Clearwire has service in CMH. Thus, no protection sites.

 

Robert

 

Posted via Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any protection sites in Columbus, Ohio?

 

Columbus is showing completely covered by WiMax on Clear's coverage map.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well wimax coverage in my work area of downtown columbus ohio is not the best coverage as the map says. Many places outside that I can't connect to 4G and most places I work that can't connect inside. All I want as a longtime customer is to be able to have better building penetration with 3g and not have to roam to talk and super slow data while roaming. It will be amazing to have actual coverage that there maps show after NV.

 

Sent from my EVO 3D w/ MeanRom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood. However this is a protection site thread.

 

Robert

 

Posted via Forum Runner

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

I noticed that Marion Ohio has a Protection 4G tower, but I don't receive any 4G signal. Is that to say that it hasn't been activated just yet for the general public to use? Thank you. Mark - KD8RUW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed that Marion Ohio has a Protection 4G tower, but I don't receive any 4G signal. Is that to say that it hasn't been activated just yet for the general public to use? Thank you. Mark - KD8RUW

 

The Marion WiMax Protection Site went live a long time ago. We announced it back on July 26, 2011. However, I have heard several reports of people trying to connect to it since then, and have been unable to. There are a few protection sites like this one which just flat out aren't working. And getting Clearwire out to fix Protection Sites is almost an impossibility. I have tried several times. :(

 

Robert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert, when I bought my phone, I was told the 4G would go active in mid Summer. I wonder if that rings possible on your end. What do you think? We have really bad 3G service in town except when you are close to the tower at the 5 points (Center and David st.). Most people are Verizon in Marion, but I always liked Sprint and their plans. Just wish the coverage was better. I am thinking of getting a repeater for the car just to get better signal, unless you say there is improvement soon. Thanks Robert. -Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites
Robert' date=' when I bought my phone, I was told the 4G would go active in mid Summer. I wonder if that rings possible on your end. What do you think? We have really bad 3G service in town except when you are close to the tower at the 5 points (Center and David st.). Most people are Verizon in Marion, but I always liked Sprint and their plans. Just wish the coverage was better. I am thinking of getting a repeater for the car just to get better signal, unless you say there is improvement soon. Thanks Robert. -Mark[/quote']

 

Network Vision will help your issues there. However, NV will not get to your area until 2013.

 

Robert

 

Robert via NOVO7PALADIN Tablet using Forum Runner

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...

So do the bare minimum... I like how all of Arizona is almost not meeting the standard. If you cant back it up then don't take the spectrum from carriers that can use it right! I hate clear and hope they die.. i cant even use it were i live because its only down town, im not in the middle of no ware and we don't even get crappy wimax! There is so much traffic ware i live it takes forever to get where i need to go, yet we don't get wimax or 4g?? I keep asking myself why did i pick sprint.. WHEN VERIZON AND AT&T HAVE 4G! :(

Edited by newgroundsguru
Link to post
Share on other sites

So do the bare minimum... I like how all of Arizona is almost not meeting the standard. If you cant back it up then don't take the spectrum from carriers that can use it right! I hate clear and hope they die.. i cant even use it were i live because its only down town, im not in the middle of no ware and we don't even get crappy wimax! There is so much traffic ware i live it takes forever to get where i need to go, yet we don't get wimax or 4g?? I keep asking myself why did i pick sprint.. WHEN VERIZON AND AT&T HAVE 4G! :(

 

Well it looks like you came up with a solution, since verizon and at&t have what you are looking for, then by all means, sign up with them. This is not a website where you come to voice your disdain for a particular company or to rant senselessly. If you have issues then take it up with sprint, if they aren't providing you with what you need, I don't think sprint is going to hold you hostage. You have options, so exercise those options, just know that coming here to complain isn't one of those options.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think in most cases if you don't like Sprint you should switch to another carrier, there are decent priced options for all carriers.

 

Verizon - Straight talk true unlimited $45 a month, don't like the crappy selection either fix it yourself illegally (ESN swap) or deal with it.

 

AT&T - use Straight Talk for 2 gigs of high speed data and unlimited throttled data. $45 a month

 

US Cellular - switch to a postpaid true unlimited 4G LTE plan. It costs $79 a month. I sort of wish I could switch to this as USCC has LTE in my area.

 

T-Mobile - either get on a postpaid $79.99 a month unlimited 4G plan or use straight talk for true unlimited prepaid at $45 a month.

 

You have options, if Sprint isn't working for you choose one of these and stick with it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah ok, sorry im so bitter.. I switched from Verizon to sprint because of the price and i was told that we were going to get LTE in my area last year.. Also, i am stuck with sprint until June of 2013 or i have to pay dumb ass ETFs.. I just feel that all i get from cell phone companies is lies.

Edited by newgroundsguru
Link to post
Share on other sites
I just feel that all i get from cell phone companies is lies.

Corporations lie to get money? Who knew?

 

Sent from a phone using an application. That's pretty cool.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah ok, sorry im so bitter.. I switched from Verizon to sprint because of the price and i was told that we were going to get LTE in my area last year..

 

Whoever told you you would be getting LTE last year was outright lying. Sprint didn't even announce the LTE project until last year as far as I know, and there was no information that said anyone would be getting LTE until this past summer. You will get LTE, but it probably won't be until sometime in the Spring, possibly late Winter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
all i get from cell phone companies is lies.

 

If you have a complaint with sprint, I will direct you to community.sprint.com or Dan@sprint.com

This forum is not the proper outlet for your rants. If you want to stick around, I suggest you read and abide by the forum rules. We don't tolerate these kinds of posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just feel that all i get from cell phone companies is lies.

Whoever told you you would be getting LTE last year was outright lying.

 

I would not go so far as to say that anyone was necessarily lying. That would require intent to deceive. Remember these words...

 

 

And remember these words, too. As I have said many times, DO NOT ASK DEPLOYMENT QUESTIONS OF ENTRY LEVEL EMPLOYEES. That is just stupid on your part. It is akin to asking your Walmart cashier for tech support.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By lilotimz
      Samsung TDD-LTE gear which are being utilized in Clearwire priority sites. .   Clearwire - Samsung TDD-LTE RRH SLS-BD106Q & Antennas           Samsung TD-LTE RRUs mounted behind BRS/EBS Antenna     Sprint 2500-2600 mhz TD-LTE Setup Note the Antennas are much thicker and fatter than the antennas being utilized by Sprint Network Vision.  
       

       
      Clearwire TD-LTE Base Station / Cabinet
      May be subject to change as TD-LTE sites start being integrated into the Network Vision setups.
       

       

       

       
      Happy Hunting!
        I'll clean the post up this weekend when I have more time.   Courtesy of Sbolen from Missouri market. Samsung TDD RRH SLS-BD104Q1
      Samsung TDD RRH SLS-BD106Q
    • By S4GRU
      S4GRU members, want to see your name up in lights? Here is your chance...The WiMax countdown clock is up on the front page of The Forums. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/index 
       
      As a fundraiser for S4GRU, you can claim "naming rights" to the WiMax countdown clock for a day for a $20 donation.  Now, who will step up to the plate and meet my challenge to keep the sponsorship going? Celebrate the shutdown of WiMax! Show your support for multiple B41 carriers and carrier aggregation. And, of course, see your name get recognized by tens of thousands of others around the country.  
       
      Just make a $20 PayPal donation, put "WiMax Countdown" in the message, and the clock is yours for a day (or more).   You can sponsor as many days as you like.  This is open to anyone, including S4GRU Staff.  Only banned members cannot participate.  Donations will counted toward your membership cumulative totals, including upgrades to Sponsor, Premier Sponsor and Honored Premier status. Donations will go to the next open day available to be Sponsored. We will not allow specific days to be selected.
       
      We are auctioning off the final day.  The highest bidder will get the Sponsor privileges of the final day. See post below for more info.  
       
      Help support S4GRU and be a part of history as WiMax fades off into the sunset. Click here to donate and Sponsor the WiMax Clock
    • By KnarfOH
      I am presently customer of the old Clearwire for home internet service.  By twist of fate, there are no other high-speed internet providers in my area - NOTHING! - unless you consider satellite services.  Clearwire was reluctant to give me a CLEAR EXPRESS HUB and sign me up originally because my home is literally shown to be in a marginal area of service.  My lot was shown to be covered but not the adjacent lots (not sure how that happens?).  Anyway, they gave me the modem and I experience around 6 Mbps downloads and 1 Mbps uploads (with an outside antenna).  For someone coming off dial-up and satellite (Wildblue) these speeds were terrific!  I am happy!  I understand my service is not as good as many others, but for this area it is fabulous!   With the recent announcements that Clearwire's Wimax service will be phased out by the end of 2015 - I am on pins and needles waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I live in Canal Winchester (suburb of Columbus, OH) and would be devastated If I lost my Clearwire service and we are not part of some Sprint LTE upgrade that will allow us to obtain high-speed internet when Clearwire goes away   Why isn't Sprint more open about their future plans to provide service to areas they acquired from Clearwire, including types of services and time frames other then generalities that I sometimes see published.  The tower I ping off of is located in Columbus (moderate density housing) and I have to believe that Columbus (15th largest city in the USA) would be near the top.  The tower is 3 to 4 miles away.  

       

    • By lequonrobinson
      i wanted to know what round will maryland be in and is nv going underway in this market right now i have seen speeds 1.5 to 2 megs down consistantly before it was under 600 kps so i wanted to ask
    • By lilotimz
      Samsung Telecommunications America
      2.5 ghz 8T8R RRH & Antenna
      Model: RRH-V3 / RRH-B8
       
      The equipment and antennas as posted are unique to Sprint Corporations nationwide 8T8R TDD-LTE deployment and there should absolutely be no mistaking these equipment for anyone elses. This specific setup uses a Samsung 8 Transmit 8 Receive (8T8R) Remote Radio Head (RRH) and a compatible 8T8R 2496-2690 mhz antenna.
       
      A Sprint Samsung B41 TDD-LTE (Spark) 8T8R Setup
       

       
      Samsung Network Vision 1.0 + 2.5 Setup
       

       

       

       

       
      NV 1.0 + 2.5 Setup with RADAR filters 
       

       
      Close Look
       

       

       

       

       

       
      View from Back
       

       
      View from Below
       

       

       

       
      Special Case "Tri-Band Antenna" Setup Deployed for engineering reasons these sites do not deploy a dedicated 8T8R antenna for 2.5 but instead opts for a three frequency antenna that supports 800 MHz + 1900 MHz and 2500 MHz. Due to size constraints for the antennas they limit the 8T8R RRUs to 4T4R (4 Jumpers from radios to antennas)  with the subsequent decrease of maximum capacity (60 MHz vs 120 MHz of 8T8R).   
       
      Diagram of above setup
       




      Much thanks to el1117 & dkyeager & Oakley707
       
      Full album
  • Posts

    • Initially T-Mobile was simply slapping n41 panels onto existing sites which meant that NR+LTE aggregation aggregated all available LTE bands with NR. Now, T-Mobile seems to be replacing 600/700MHz antennas every time they add n41 and as a result, the city is getting covered in split eNB IDs. On a local (legacy) 600MHz site by my home, when I connect to n71 it's n71 + Band 2 + Band 66 + Band 71 or Band 12 for a combined total of 50MHz of spectrum. However on my home site, because of the split eNB, when I force my phone to connect to n71 it only aggregates n71 + Band 2 + Band 66 for a total of 45MHz of spectrum. It seems weird that T-Mobile is allowing this to happen instead of fixing it so that they can squeeze as much performance out of their network as possible. 5MHz of LTE is not much but it's still an extra ~37Mbps of speed and capacity that could be provided in NSA mode. Interestingly this problem is not something I experience in LTE-only mode much anymore. My phone seems to have no issue aggregating LTE bands across the split most of the time.   Another thing that has been bothering me is that according to the FCC dashboard T-Mobile has 400MHz of spectrum in the 39GHz band here in NYC that they won in December of 2019 but they haven't done any upgrades to actually use that spectrum here. Instead they've been relying on the two 50MHz blocks aggregated together in the 28GHz band which performs worse than n41 on average.
    • Betting VZW trades that B12 to TMo for B66 eventually.
    • Confirmed that AT&T is running dedicated n5 here, at 10 MHz, by process of elimination. LTE is 10x10, and H+ is 5x5. They might be running DSS or n2 or n66 but I kinda doubt it. Guessing they aren't running H+ on every site anymore either; signal appeared a good bit weaker than the B5 LTE signal when I band selected to it. Also, B14 is pretty obviously not on every site here; signal levels at my place are comparable to B2 and, well, 700 should be a lot better than that. Explains why I wasn't seeing B14 aggregated normally. Though apparently they have 25 MHz of B66...one 15 MHz carrier, one 10 MHz.
    • I DM”d him on the 16th, no reply yet. Guessing he’s just too busy lately.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...