Jump to content

Sprint Coverage Map update 5/19


orangeblue

Recommended Posts

I just checked the Sprint website an noticed that their coverage map was updated. Have any new cities launched officially LTE service?

All official announcements can be found on: http://newsroom.sprint.com/news-releases/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that link but nothing was announced but it does not explain the updated coverage maps. What has changed between 5/4 and 5/19

 

They update the maps generally once a week, sometimes every two weeks to reflect newly upgraded towers, added coverage and whatnot. It does not correlate to new market launches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that link but nothing was announced but it does not explain the updated coverage maps. What has changed between 5/4 and 5/19

 

Hey you're the one that used the word "officially". :lol:

 

The maps update when they're ready to show LTE available in an area, but that does not mean the area is "officially" launched in their words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that link but nothing was announced but it does not explain the updated coverage maps. What has changed between 5/4 and 5/19

 

Im looking at my local area and it seems they extended the LTE out further.  I dont have past coverage maps to compare this to though but i dont seem to remember LTE coverage to be depicted this far reaching.  Based on the two full build sites that serve my town and the next city over the coverage, if I had to guess, shows LTE on band 26.  However, I have not seen band 26 on my Nexus 5 yet.  Could be I dont have the capabilities to connect to it yet or maybe it has not been accepted but possibly, they added in some band 26 coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It my be different departments, but it does seem to be a leading indicator for market launches about 50% of time during the last few months. Nothing new in Ohio that I could spot on here: http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=ATG:HE:Cov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It my be different departments, but it does seem to be a leading indicator for market launches about 50% of time during the last few months. Nothing new in Ohio that I could spot on here: http://coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?INTNAV=ATG:HE:Cov

 

Maps do tend to be updated before the launch announcements come out, but they also update the maps generally once a week to reflect network improvements within launched areas. It doesn't always correlate to a market launch. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maps do tend to be updated before the launch announcements come out, but they also update the maps generally once a week to reflect network improvements within launched areas. It doesn't always correlate to a market launch. 

 

Agreed, some of the changes lately have been to reflect increased coverage of band 26 LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least sprint has theses types maps .

 All of the national carriers do.  You often have to go to the investor section of their website for the regional carriers and dig through their documents or demand them from a sales rep. 

 

The even more interesting Sprint map is their network enhancements and upgrades.  2 data generally means band 25 LTE 1900. https://network.sprint.com/search/chillicothe%2C+oh/  Seems to frequently be updated nightly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey you're the one that used the word "officially". :lol:

 

The maps update when they're ready to show LTE available in an area, but that does not mean the area is "officially" launched in their words.

 

:rasp: I'm telling you, don't text and drive...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rasp: I'm telling you, don't text and drive...

 

No, ASCII and text.  (And if you do not get it, look at the picture and say it aloud.)

 

phone-app-ski.jpg

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I would like to see a technical explanation as to how 5G network slicing is supposed to work with Net Neutrality.  My read on this which may be incorrect is that network slicing would only be allowed under net neutrality so long as the slice of the network is a private network but that seems to contradict the ability for the general public to use a public facing app from the app store that will run over the network slice.
    • https://www.lightreading.com/fixed-wireless-access/t-mobile-verizon-disclose-fwa-usage-stats I disagree with this article.  AT&T and Verizon have many rural sites without C-Band (or mmWave),  which ultimately are use it or lose it for them due to licensing requirements.  T-Mobile's rural FWA will greatly benefit once Auction 108 licenses are finally awarded.  Thus much growth is left for FWA.  So far the carriers have been going after the low hanging fruit in the suburbs and exburbs.  In those places FWA may ultimately be forced out.  Perhaps by them BEAD money would be better put to use to bury fiber in suburban back yards (or next to the curb).  This assumes that FWA will result in more rural towers given better economics with wireless plus FWA revenue.
    • https://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/verizons-joe-russo-explains-why-being-first-5g-sa-wasnt-priority Excuses or valid? likely a bit of both.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...