lilotimz Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 Here's a question... is Sprint going to eventually go to running 40 MHz TD-LTE channels at 3:2? I think Sprint should consider putting that option on the table in the near future. Anything bigger than that is ridiculous but I'd say 40 MHz will allow Sprint to compete with any of the other Big 4 carriers.There is no such thing as 40 mhz carriers. The biggest sized carrier set by 3gpp is 20mhz. Sent from my Nexus 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fraydog Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 https://blogs.nsn.com/mobile-networks/2011/10/03/td-lte-launches-made-easy-with-new-8-pipes-radio-head/ I see this and am mildly confused. At least if the 3GPP gives the go ahead to allow 40 MHz channels, Sprint can implement it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lilotimz Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 https://blogs.nsn.com/mobile-networks/2011/10/03/td-lte-launches-made-easy-with-new-8-pipes-radio-head/ I see this and am mildly confused. At least if the 3GPP gives the go ahead to allow 40 MHz channels, Sprint can implement it. This is the NSN 8T8R B41 RRH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiWavelength Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 https://blogs.nsn.com/mobile-networks/2011/10/03/td-lte-launches-made-easy-with-new-8-pipes-radio-head/ It will be delayed while Thom Yorke sues NSN for trademark infringement. AJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dkyeager Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/verizon-touts-numbers-behind-its-xlte-rollout/2014-05-26 There are also using some of the same arguments about improved service for all that we have used here for Sprint Triband. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosefTor Posted May 31, 2014 Share Posted May 31, 2014 Until Sprint fires Ericsson (or at least chooses to not renew their contract come 2016) and brings network management in-house, the long-term condition of the network will remain a legitimate concern. I agree about firing Erickson and going out to bid.... But why bring network management in house? Of course that should be considered, but it is likely a better business decision to outsource especially since this employee force will have to ramp up and down a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gnoj Posted June 5, 2014 Share Posted June 5, 2014 I agree about firing Erickson and going out to bid.... But why bring network management in house? Of course that should be considered, but it is likely a better business decision to outsource especially since this employee force will have to ramp up and down a lot. Vertical integration, mostly. However, I'd be open to using another company (e.g. NSN), if they are open to a short-term (1 or 2 year) contract to trial their performance. I just don't want to see Sprint stung by being locked into another 7+ yr contract with a subpar partner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.