Jump to content

Sprint may need up to 40,000 new cell sites for 2.5 GHz


mhammett

Recommended Posts

http://www.fiercewireless.com/tech/story/sprint-may-need-40000-new-cell-sites-25-ghz-tower-exec-says/2014-05-04?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Editor&utm_campaign=SocialMedia

 

 

 

 

Sprint (NYSE: S) will need to roll out an additional 30,000-40,000 transmission sites if the carrier wants its 2.5 GHz TD-LTE network to reach coverage parity with its 1.9 GHz networks, according to the head of American Tower.

 

Well, we kinda already knew that and I don't think their attempting to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for 40K More towers...but how about in areas not covered! How about with NV TOO!!  :-) Let's get some more organic coverage!! :-D

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be much less because of beam forming. And the propagation difference between 2600 and 1900MHz is not as big as they are making it out to be. We notice a huge difference between 2600 Wimax and 1900 EVDO. But the difference between LTE 2600 and LTE 1900 is much smaller.

 

Sprint says in internal documents that 1900MHz reaches only 30% farther than 2600 with all things being equal. And beamforming can close most of that gap, if not all of it.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You can subtract the 8,000 non-redundant Clearwire sites from that number.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think American Tower is just trying to lure investors into thinking they are going to go gang busters in the next few years.

 

I literally came in here to post that exact statement. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-sales-tactics-employee-interview-3460125/   From the "Uncarrier" to Carrier....
    • Another SCP beta is rolling out now, with some bugfixes as usual but also some fun new options to test: Non-standalone 5G-NR cells can now display Site Notes. This feature works in the same manner as how neighbor cell notes are displayed, requiring a PCI and your device's location. This option is enabled by default. As is the case with neighbor cell notes, you cannot edit NSA site notes directly unless there is an NCI being reported (which I have never seen); it uses the previously recorded standalone log entries. Like neighbor notes, if a cell has been previously logged but there is no note, you will see the distance information only.   Logging cells that are not reporting a valid PLMN is now possible. This option is disabled by default, but if you enable it along with two other options (log sites with missing GCI/NCI and to log sites with missing TAC), you should begin logging most NSA 5G-NR cells. A PCI is needed at a minimum, which is not always reported depending on your device and network factors. ("Sites" will be renamed to "cells" on the Preferences menu in the next update.)   Users can enable an option to display LTE cells above 5G-NR cells in the app if they choose to do so. This option is disabled by default. Should help improve the readability of your screen if you have NSA 5G-NR cells constantly appearing/disappearing. Please give these options a try and let me know if you notice any issues.. thanks!
    • Not yet. We probably won't see one submitted until construction on the new building is substantially complete. 
    • Yes, that is where the site used to be. All the antennas were removed. I hope they add a new site soon. Have any permits been submitted for a new site?
    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...