Jump to content

Hotspots in GM vehicles (Old News)


MarshieZ

Recommended Posts

I know this has been out for a while, but coming in a few short months we will see the Wi-Fi built in to OnStar with AT&T 4G LTE technology.

 

The question though is, cost. No where has hinted at plans or pricing.

 

What do you guys think of this and do you think this will have an impact on Sprint, T-Mobile or Verizon? Do you think we will see this technology expand to other vehicles and carriers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this has been out for a while, but coming in a few short months we will see the Wi-Fi built in to OnStar with AT&T 4G LTE technology.

 

The question though is, cost. No where has hinted at plans or pricing.

 

What do you guys think of this and do you think this will have an impact on Sprint, T-Mobile or Verizon? Do you think we will see this technology expand to other vehicles and carriers?

 

This is nothing new in terms of ground breaking technology, just backed by a vendor. Cost shouldn't be any different than a mobile hotspot plan since the technology is the same. May be a $5 discount as OnStar may front some of the bill since you pay for them anyway which will probably offset by a price increase. I don't see other carriers rushing to do so. It will come eventually over the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's nothing new, that's why I titled it "Old News" because it is many years old, but it is new because this is the first year they are putting it into play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought onStar used Verizon, but I guess I thought wrong.

 

I know, that was news to me too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Onstar has used and will continue to use Verizon for all Onstar equipped vehicles from 2014 and prior. Starting in the 2015 model year, they are switching to AT&T as their cellular provider. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Chrysler uses Verizon also through a third party.

 

http://www.autonetmobile.com/

Chrysler, and its subsidiaries (Jeep/Dodge), currently use Sprint 3G for wifi hotspots in their cars. This is true for in-house electronics, not third party addons. Why Chrysler would not implement Sprint 4G is beyond me. Needless to say, Chrysler acts as an MVNO for Sprint, Chrysler charges the user to use the wifi hotspot feature. I'll add more later when I get the chance to mess around with Chrysler's UConnect system in my Jeep Grand Cherokee. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...