Jump to content

Google Nexus 5 by LG Users Thread!


nexgencpu

Recommended Posts

I wasn't hoping to start a Sprint flame war.

 

I'm sure there's reasons for everything. As a multi billion dollar company, they wouldn't purposefully do something like this because they didn't see it coming. The benefits has to outweigh the short term cons.

 

I understand some of you feel let down, but at least we somewhat got this issue figured out while we are all still well within our 14 day return policy.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

Exactly. While I'm upset I'm back to 2011 3G speeds, its good to finally know the cause and that it can be fixed. I live in an announced LTE market. Here's to hoping Sprint flips on the 3G NV (all equipment is in place for 3G if the site has LTE) ASAP.

 

It seems that Sprint turns on LTE as soon as, or soon after the NV equipment and backhaul have been installed. Then they wait until all of the sites in a small area, or "cluster" are upgraded to turn on 3g/voice NV to avoid the handoff issues they saw in the first several NV markets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received my 32gb N5 this past thursday.The first thing I notice was the RF performance of LTE. Usually In my bedroom my Samsung Galaxy S4 was getting from -108 to -113dbm, now with this phone I am getting -93 to -95dbm. I am finally happy that I can have LTE signal in one of our favorite place in the house "The Bathroom" were my SGS4 dropped back to 3G. Doing my morning Glory while reading the news on my cell phone with LTE now is "Priceless"

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got the phone yesterday from Sprint, its great and luckily I don't have any issues with LTE connectivity whatsoever. Works great out of the box. My only gripe its with the voicemail. Receive a call, let it go to voicemail and it won't show any voicemail notification. Have to dial 1 to go into voicemail to check if I have a voicemail. Can't do Google Voice, because it doesn't work in Puerto Rico. My last Android phone (Gingerbread 2.3) at least I received a visual notification that I had voicemail. Now nada. Besides Google Voice, anyone receives a voicemail notificaction? Any ideas?

Gustavo I also live in Puerto Rico and I am having the same problem as you since GV does not work in PR. There are some apps on the store like Youmail Visual Voicemail that I will give a try.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gustavo I also live in Puerto Rico and I am having the same problem as you since GV does not work in PR. There are some apps on the store like Youmail Visual Voicemail that I will give a try.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

So,in PR you are not experiencing any LTE connectivity issues?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So,in PR you are not experiencing any LTE connectivity issues?

Nope. Got LTE since activation.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So,in PR you are not experiencing any LTE connectivity issues?

Two days using the phone and no issues with LTE connectivity. The PR market is 100% 3g NV Complete updates and like 88% LTE completed. We are lucky.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gustavo I also live in Puerto Rico and I am having the same problem as you since GV does not work in PR. There are some apps on the store like Youmail Visual Voicemail that I will give a try.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Let me know if it works for you.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two days using the phone and no issues with LTE connectivity. The PR market is 100% 3g NV Complete updates and like 88% LTE completed. We are lucky.

 

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4

Ya, I hear ya. Some of us here in Incumbent land have reported ONLY being able to connect to 4G only sites.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I was successfully able to remove my Tmobile sim from my Nexus 5, put in a Sprint sim (which I got at the local store) and transfer the existing Sprint service from my iPhone 5. I'm supposedly in a Spark area, but I didn't notice a stronger signal or better speeds. What I did find is that if I lost LTE and the phone went to 3G, even once I returned to an area that I know had strong LTE, the phone stayed on 3G unless I toggled airplane mode. I played around with it for a few hours, mapped the areas around my house on Sensorly, but ultimately the Sprint experience on this phone was extremely inferior to what I was getting with the Tmobile SIM, so I just switched back. Maybe in time I'll try it again, but for now I'm going to keep my iPhone on Sprint and the Nexus 5 on Tmobile. What is good to know is that switching between Sprint and Tmobile is *almost* as easy as it is between GSM carriers - and activating on Sprint doesn't affect the fact that the Google Play version is unlocked. (The rep at the store told me that once I activated it would lock the phone to Sprint - not so!!)

Great info and good to know~! I'm currently enjoying my N5 on a prepaid T-Mobile Kim card and the speeds & experience have been great. :)

 

Quick question: when you activated the N5 on Sprint after putting in a Sprint card, what were the subsequent steps? Were you able to activate the N5 on Sprint via website or did you have to call in to Sprint?

 

Also, were you made to pay an activation charge? I thought one didn't have to pay an activation charge but I was charged the fee earlier this year when I switched from the E4GT to the GS4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands and Ft. Wayne/South Bend will not have LTE problems with Triband devices because NV 3G is complete in those markets. Markets that have NV 3G complete will be fine on Triband LTE devices.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samsung markets shine once again. Way to go Samsung! Hopefully Sprint will light a fire under Ericsson and get off their lazy rears and do some 3g integrations on the 4g only sites.

Actually, Samsung is the worst in this scenario. Other than PR/VI, all Samsung markets have a different legacy vendor. Therefore, every Samsung LTE site accepted without 3G complete is going to be a problem. Fortunately, Samsung is now flying on 3G acceptances. And has since summer. I would guess they have known since summer, and that's why Samsung has been flying on NV equipment installs for the past 3-4 months.

 

Also, Ericsson has really been pushing on 3G acceptances too the past few months. And at least a lot of Ericsson NV markets have Ericsson (Nortel) legacy equipment.

 

Alcatel Lucent comes off very well in this problem. Since most of their markets heavily focused on 3G deployments up front. And to think the S4GRU members in ALU markets have been so upset and vocal about 3G going in first!

 

The only ALU markets that are a problem are the ones where Motorola is the legacy, but 3G hasn't been upgraded yet. Like the North Carolina markets.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw this and found it interesting.

 

CSFB is the first step in enabling mainstream LTE handsets with the cost, size and battery life advantages of single-radio solutions to LTE data in combination with 2G/3G voice (and data fallback, in non-LTE areas). The single-radio solution is also the pathway to later phases of LTE voice evolution that add additional operator network capacity gains and user experience enhancements. CSFB network upgrades provide a first step towards VoLTE with SRVCC, the next phase of LTE voice evolution. Even as VoLTE is initially launched, VoLTE handsets will continue to require CSFB for roaming.

While several options are available to address the call setup time and reliability issues introduced by the single-radio solution, the evidence gathered to date suggests the following as solutions for handsets and supporting network infrastructure in the current phase of LTE evolution:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received my 32gb N5 this past thursday.The first thing I notice was the RF performance of LTE. Usually In my bedroom my Samsung Galaxy S4 was getting from -108 to -113dbm, now with this phone I am getting -93 to -95dbm. I am finally happy that I can have LTE signal in one of our favorite place in the house "The Bathroom" were my SGS4 dropped back to 3G. Doing my morning Glory while reading the news on my cell phone with LTE now is "Priceless"

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

does anybody think this drastic increase in signal strength has anything to do with there only being one path? Just one 1900 signal for lte instead of both cdma and lte at the same time?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Alu markets have 3g upgraded but why is my 3g horrible. And LTE is horrible in my area from speeds .05 - 3.5mbps please tell me this will get better Los Angeles certain area not all of it. 3g is horrible everywhere though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

does anybody think this drastic increase in signal strength has anything to do with there only being one path? Just one 1900 signal for lte instead of both cdma and lte at the same time?

Possibly. But it's not a surprise. The FCC OET revealed very good EIRP measurements for the Nexus 5 testing for Sprint LTE bands. So we were expecting something good. But I think it's safe to say the member reports of the great LTE RF performance has exceeded our expectations.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Alu markets have 3g upgraded but why is my 3g horrible. And LTE is horrible in my area from speeds .05 - 3.5mbps please tell me this will get better Los Angeles certain area not all of it. 3g is horrible everywhere though

LTE in one band will get overloaded on busy sites. That's why Triband is so important. It spreads traffic across three bands. Also, Band 41 is where tons of capacity exists. Much more than the current band currently deployed in LA has.

 

Also, not every site in LA has 3G upgraded. And also, the 3G sites that are upgraded but do not have LTE upgraded, means they have not had upgraded backhaul installed yet. Backhaul limitations are the biggest problem to a 3G site.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Samsung is the worst in this scenario. Other than PR/VI, all Samsung markets have a different legacy vendor. Therefore, every Samsung LTE site accepted without 3G complete is going to be a problem. Fortunately, Samsung is now flying on 3G acceptances. And has since summer. I would guess they have known since summer, and that's why Samsung has been flying on NV equipment installs for the past 3-4 months.

 

Also, Ericsson has really been pushing on 3G acceptances too the past few months. And at least a lot of Ericsson NV markets have Ericsson (Nortel) legacy equipment.

 

Alcatel Lucent comes off very well in this problem. Since most of their markets heavily focused on 3G deployments up front. And to think the S4GRU members in ALU markets have been so upset and vocal about 3G going in first!

 

The only ALU markets that are a problem are the ones where Motorola is the legacy, but 3G hasn't been upgraded yet. Like the North Carolina markets.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

That's a big reason why I've forgiven AlLu.

 

I don't have much of an issue with how they are doing acceptances. We all know Samsung is busting butt, that leaves Ericsson or should I call them Red Sticky, Inc. :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If eCSFB wasn't part of the original Network Vision 1.0 plan then there might need to be a software update pushed to existing NV1.0 equipment to play nice.  The leaked document says "All markets need to be upgraded with eCSFB capability"  Perhaps this is why some users have seen their LTE all a sudden start working.  Sprint may be in a mad dash to push out software updates for the new eCSFB phones....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The only ALU markets that are a problem are the ones where Motorola is the legacy, but 3G hasn't been upgraded yet. Like the North Carolina markets.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Do you have an educated guess on a time line for this work? Has the upgrades been done but it just hasn't been accepted and turned on, or are they going to have to go through to all the towers to complete more work?

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, Samsung is the worst in this scenario. Other than PR/VI, all Samsung markets have a different legacy vendor. Therefore, every Samsung LTE site accepted without 3G complete is going to be a problem. Fortunately, Samsung is now flying on 3G acceptances. And has since summer. I would guess they have known since summer, and that's why Samsung has been flying on NV equipment installs for the past 3-4 months.

 

Also, Ericsson has really been pushing on 3G acceptances too the past few months. And at least a lot of Ericsson NV markets have Ericsson (Nortel) legacy equipment.

 

Alcatel Lucent comes off very well in this problem. Since most of their markets heavily focused on 3G deployments up front. And to think the S4GRU members in ALU markets have been so upset and vocal about 3G going in first!

 

The only ALU markets that are a problem are the ones where Motorola is the legacy, but 3G hasn't been upgraded yet. Like the North Carolina markets.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah, ALU comes off well virtually everywhere except for where I live (Inside the i-485 loop aka the city of Charlotte) in which literally all but 7 of nearly 50 sites are purple. Gah. Just my luck. Oh well. Hopefully this means Sprint pushes ALU to work faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...