Jump to content

Sprint to join Rural Operators Roaming Hub (CCA and RRPP thread)


marioc21

Recommended Posts

You *may* be able to get 1x on Sprint and EVDO on Roaming. I've had that happen before. But Sprint EVDO has to be out of range. And it doesn't seem to work that way with all devices.

 

Do you recall any correlation between that native CDMA1X + roaming EV-DO split and SVDO handset capabilities?  In those handsets, CDMA1X and EV-DO were on separate RF paths.  The native + roaming split does not seem to happen often, if at all on modern single RF path handsets.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you recall any correlation between that native CDMA1X + roaming EV-DO split and SVDO handset capabilities? In those handsets, CDMA1X and EV-DO were on separate RF paths. The native + roaming split does not seem to happen often, if at all on modern single RF path handsets.

 

AJ

Maybe I can show proof sometime if I see it again. But it periodically happens to me on my nexus 5 in reverse (roaming voice, native data) at work.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I can show proof sometime if I see it again. But it periodically happens to me on my nexus 5 in reverse (roaming voice, native data) at work.

 

My Note 4 does this as well, roaming voice and native data.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had it happen on my Nexus 6, I think. It's hard to tell, since EVDO doesn't show the carrier. But 1x was Verizon at -90 and EVDO was -102. Is there a way to verify who the EVDO carrier is?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just had it happen on my Nexus 6, I think. It's hard to tell, since EVDO doesn't show the carrier. But 1x was Verizon at -90 and EVDO was -102. Is there a way to verify who the EVDO carrier is?

 

Sent from my Nexus 6

Looking at the engineering screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got it.

 

That is not in Overland Park, is it?  Where did you take that screenshot?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Houston

 

Gotcha.  VZW Kansas City is SID 59, not SID 12.  But it would not have shocked me if VZW had consolidated many SIDs across the center of the country.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotcha.  VZW Kansas City is SID 59, not SID 12.  But it would not have shocked me if VZW had consolidated many SIDs across the center of the country.

 

AJ

 

I visit family in Houston in the summer and unfortunately Sprint still needs to densify around here. On the other hand, I do get to see strange scenarios like above.

 

I achieved this by grabbing a weak LTE signal and starting to download a file. Move the phone around a bit to get a hand off to Sprint 1X/eHRPD. While still maintaining the data connection with the download, I placed a variety of grips on the phone on and off until Sprint 1X was lost and Verizon 1X was picked up. If you grip too long, you'll lose eHRPD. Too short, and you won't drop Sprint 1X.

 

I can't remember the last time I dropped LTE in Overland Park, they have an outstanding network there (as they should, headquarters and all.)

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Sprint's roaming partner in Montana? According to the maps, Sprint has off-network EVDO roaming in Billings and North Central/East Montana.

 

We are not discussing that here any longer.  We are discussing it in this thread:

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/7080-wahoo-us-cellullar-and-other-ev-do-roaming-is-live/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently in the latest update that enabled CA on certain devices there is a menu to enable LTE roaming. Not that it is active yet, but it is a indication that we are getting closer. Will it take another update to get Nexus devices to LTE roam or will it be a simple profile update?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently in the latest update that enabled CA on certain devices there is a menu to enable LTE roaming. Not that it is active yet, but it is a indication that we are getting closer. Will it take another update to get Nexus devices to LTE roam or will it be a simple profile update?

 

Hmmm, I've had the LTE roaming option on my S6Edge since I got the phone. Which phones are seeing the new menu option?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought CCA coverage was going to be pseudo native?

 

Pseudo-native are only for those that signed up in addition to the Sprint SNA agreement. It has additional stipulations and requirements that must be upheld in order for recipricol native roaming.

 

CCA only serves as a means for carriers to efficiently and easily sign roaming deals with each other at a much cheaper cost. Hence EVDO roaming being enabled for CCA partners both ways. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Possibly relevant article posted in the EV-DO roaming thread, "U.S. Cellular to launch LTE roaming in next 60-90 days":

 

Hmmmm.....

 

-Mike

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possibly relevant article posted in the EV-DO roaming thread, "U.S. Cellular to launch LTE roaming in next 60-90 days":

 

 

Hmmmm.....

 

-Mike

 

This will be huge for the Wisconsin Sprint market where USCC is mature and pervasive in the western half of the state that's devoid of Sprint coverage. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be huge for the Wisconsin Sprint market where USCC is mature and pervasive in the western half of the state that's devoid of Sprint coverage.

Sadly, a roaming deal is no guarantee of Sprint getting access to the USCC network. It is always possible that they just are paying the partner to roam on their network. Honestly, if Sprint doesn't change the roaming cap, access to USCC LTE doesn't mean much either.
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly, a roaming deal is no guarantee of Sprint getting access to the USCC network. It is always possible that they just are paying the partner to roam on their network. Honestly, if Sprint doesn't change the roaming cap, access to USCC LTE doesn't mean much either.

My understanding was this would be a RRP agreement where the LTE roaming would be considered "native"? Maybe that's changed? Haven't kept up with this in a while.

 

sent from an underwater dust storm from my Sprint S5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...