Jump to content

Recent high latencies


Recommended Posts

Those are relatively high, but since the throughput is high, I would believe the issue could be at the Core. If the airlink was the cause, the throughput would be down lower too. Is this consistent across several speed test servers? Because I sometimes have this problem with this one server that I like to use most often for AT&T. It will be that way for a week or so, then go back to normal. But other servers will be fine.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who care your speeds are very high.

Latency is I think more important than huge download speeds.

This this this. I have download speeds of around 10+ right now but my latency has sucked. Normally above 200 or 300 on my home ISP. My pages load like they're on dial up.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are relatively high, but since the throughput is high, I would believe the issue could be at the Core. If the airlink was the cause, the throughput would be down lower too. Is this consistent across several speed test servers? Because I sometimes have this problem with this one server that I like to use most often for AT&T. It will be that way for a week or so, then go back to normal. But other servers will be fine.

 

Robert via Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Could it be any issue with the backhaul? I have seen my own internet be fine with download , and upload, but latency is 5x higher than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that your increased latencies are related to your needlessly massive screenshots that you posted.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that your increased latencies are related to your needlessly massive screenshots that you posted.

 

AJ

Moo. I just upload to imgur and post.

 

Anyway, it happens regardless of test server, though I didn't want to just bang away at the speed tests. This is happening all over this area. Great speeds, crap pings. Here's a few days ago:

 

smPPTij.jpg

 

56mYgfh.jpg

 

While this is what I used to see:

qOwIaOz.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moo. I just upload to imgur and post.

 

Anyway, it happens regardless of test server, though I didn't want to just bang away at the speed tests. This is happening all over this area. Great speeds, crap pings. Here's a few days ago:

While this is what I used to see:

What is it with you and saying Moo? Anyway, since you're using Imgur then it's super easy to use smaller pics. Just click the "Large Thumbnail" button to the right and it'll do the hard part for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is it with you and saying Moo? Anyway, since you're using Imgur then it's super easy to use smaller pics. Just click the "Large Thumbnail" button to the right and it'll do the hard part for you.

Finally someone asks about the cow reference as an indicator of exasperation.

 

Anyway, I don't see how the image size matters. Additionally, I do not see that option in the app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally someone asks about the cow reference as an indicator of exasperation.

 

Anyway, I don't see how the image size matters. Additionally, I do not see that option in the app.

Oh I thought you were using the website since I didn't see the Tapatalk signature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally someone asks about the cow reference as an indicator of exasperation.

 

Anyway, I don't see how the image size matters. Additionally, I do not see that option in the app.

 

The image size matters.  Overly large images in a forum are obnoxious and cause lots of scrolling.  I have a 19" laptop screen and one of your screen shots doesn't fit top to bottom.  Too big!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The image size matters. Overly large images in a forum are obnoxious and cause lots of scrolling. I have a 19" laptop screen and one of your screen shots doesn't fit top to bottom. Too big!

 

Robert

Ok interesting. I will work out a way to fix. On mine it scales. didn't know it didn't on all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how frustrating it is. The LTE latencies in my home area have consistently been 110ms or higher @ RSRP -80dBm, even at 2AM.  If I travel to Asheville or Charlotte, NC, I see latencies of 75ms or less.  I used to think it was the Greenville, SC MSC, but Asheville uses the Greenville MSC too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know how frustrating it is. The LTE latencies in my home area have consistently been 110ms or higher @ RSRP -80dBm, even at 2AM.  If I travel to Asheville or Charlotte, NC, I see latencies of 75ms or less.  I used to think it was the Greenville, SC MSC, but Asheville uses the Greenville MSC too.

 

Think Sprint DDC's too, not just MSC's.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These images should be cut in half sizewise now.  On this machine I cannot see the difference due to it still scaling with this low resolution display (1024x768 on old Thinkpad X61 tablet).  Please let me know if it made any difference.  I used HTML code to shrink them in half both ways.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These images should be cut in half sizewise now.  On this machine I cannot see the difference due to it still scaling with this low resolution display (1024x768 on old Thinkpad X61 tablet).  Please let me know if it made any difference.  I used HTML code to shrink them in half both ways.

 

Much better  Thanks.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it from someone who does not have huge download speeds...YOU'RE WRONG!

I love to disagree with JoeJoeJoe. Its one of my favorite pastimes. However, he's right in this instance. But it all really depends on what you're doing.

 

Throughput matters more when you're downloading/transferring large files. Then latency (so long as it isn't insanely bad) is not as important. Who cares if a file that will take 10 minutes to download starts an extra second later? However, if it can be done in 5 minutes instead of 10, then that's a good thing.

 

However, for most things done on a smartphone, it is small amounts of data sent and called for frequently. And for these things, lower latency is better. And higher latencies can really make it feel sluggish. Even if your throughput is 30Mbps.

 

Ideally, latency under 80ms and throughput above 3Mbps and your smartphone feels fantastic for most things. And if you're used to a latency of 75ms and it doubles to 150ms...you're likely going to notice. Because everything you do online will take double the time for the internet to start responding to what you're doing.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm getting real bad speeds on a tower I connect to frequently here in Wichita, KS. It seems like the tower I connect to never gets faster than .1 down or up in Mbps. I heard that they're upgrading the tower's backhaul but this is pretty bad. Any ideas? PM me if you need specifics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You might say that Kevin Fitchard is at it again. The following was his tweet in reference to the Fierce Wireless story:

 

Sprint continues to post weakest network latency scores @FierceWireless: http://t.co/4Inel4iq5C
https://twitter.com/kfitchard/status/445634835961225216I do not know why he insists on highlighting something ostensibly negative about Sprint. He clearly has an axe to grind.Of course, maybe Phil Goldstein is to blame. Fierce Wireless ran a full four major operator comparison article, which is linked earlier in this thread. But for some reason, Phil felt the need to write a separate article, pointing out that Sprint had the highest latencies of the four. Why that article was even necessary, I do not know.These guys just love to rip on Sprint. They really should be ashamed.AJ
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...