Jump to content

FACTUAL coverage comparison (Verizon's LTE comparison but using sensorly data)


SWMich4G

Recommended Posts

Is it possible to generate a theoretical coverage map with 800 MHz fully deployed? It'd be really cool to see how much sprint is going to cover thanks to 800. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I thought I saw something like this toward the very beginning of the NV 1.0 rollout.  That is to say I'm about positive I saw a map showing the hypothetical 800mhz (presumably voice) coverage post rollout.  Does anyone have a link to this map?  AJ, Robert..anyone?  Or am I just imagining things?  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I saw something like this toward the very beginning of the NV 1.0 rollout.  That is to say I'm about positive I saw a map showing the hypothetical 800mhz (presumably voice) coverage post rollout.  Does anyone have a link to this map?  AJ, Robert..anyone?  Or am I just imagining things?  

 

1OQudk7.png

njrDdGb.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bottom line, Verizon's commercial can't keep up with Sprint's 1900 LTE nationwide deployment.  A rough average of 30 Sprint sites have been lit up with LTE everyday for the last two years *4G only, 3G/4G, and 3G/800/4G,* so a week of airing this useless commercial Sprint turned on 210 LTE sites, this just shows how rapid Sprint is in deploying their LTE coverage.  I've seen this commercial many times, if you read the fine print it shows nationwide providers LTE coverage based from January - June, 2013 and clearly Verizon is using a map for Sprint from Jan. 2013.  Verizon, you should use a Sprint LTE coverage map from January 2014, it would paint a much different jaw dropping picture.   :hee:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sprint native coverage will not look like it does on the yellow map....not for a long time anyways....

 

What is that yellow map based on?  Are they incorporating roaming into the mix for that map?  There are states that have no native sprint service or very little sprint service and now they are yellow or mostly yellow in that map.  That would go beyond just the normal upgrades and would require significant build out or is that a part of NV I am nto familiar with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is that yellow map based on?  Are they incorporating roaming into the mix for that map?  There are states that have no native sprint service or very little sprint service and now they are yellow or mostly yellow in that map.  That would go beyond just the normal upgrades and would require significant build out or is that a part of NV I am nto familiar with?

 

The yellow map looks to be their coverage with VZ roaming included.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The yellow map looks to be their coverage with VZ roaming included.

 

 

The first green map looks like pre-NV coverage and the one underneath it (blue) looks like it could be the NV completed coverage with 800 turned on doesnt it? At least i dont think that is voice / data broken out separately.

 

I dont understand why they would show native coverage in the first two examples with no roaming included but then include it in the finished product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first green map looks like pre-NV coverage and the one underneath it (blue) looks like it could be the NV completed coverage with 800 turned on doesnt it? At least i dont think that is voice / data broken out separately.

 

I dont understand why they would show native coverage in the first two examples with no roaming included but then include it in the finished product.

 

The blue map is Nextel Direct Connect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The blue map is Nextel Direct Connect.

 

Oh cool thanks.

 

The question still remains then why they included Verizon roaming in the finished piece and didnt in the first.  No way to easily tell the gains in coverage pre- and post-NV, at least from that presentation.  The thread goes to show that all carriers use funny maps to get their points across.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted Image

 

If memory serves, this is just the voice map. The ones on the left are Sprint's CDMA and iDEN network prior to NV. The one on the right is everywhere a Sprint postpaid subscriber can use voice. Since you get full voice capability while roaming, that is shown in that image too.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

get on that Donate button! http://s4gru.forumflash.com/public/style_emoticons/#EMO_DIR#/wink.png

 

haha but ya.. just wanted to get you guys up to speed without having to sift thru the xda/rootzwiki forum drama and BS out there. im not a dev.. but i'm right there on the front line.. so i see whats really going on. and my time frame for release is only a personal guess based on the rate of progress I've seen along the way. We could see an ICS leak tomorrow and find a quick fix for some of the major problems... and see a daily driver build by the end of this month.

The purpose of the graphic was not to show post NV Sprint native network coverage. You are looking for more than what that image represented.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh cool thanks.

 

The question still remains then why they included Verizon roaming in the finished piece and didnt in the first.  No way to easily tell the gains in coverage pre- and post-NV, at least from that presentation.  The thread goes to show that all carriers use funny maps to get their points across.

 

Remember that a lot of things have changed since that map was created. Sprint was counting on the following things to happen:

  1. Acquiring the PCS H block
  2. Hosting LightSquared 1600 MHz spectrum
  3. Maintaining a WiMAX network as they didn't yet own Clearwire.

It's entirely possible that they were anticipating an increase in their network footprint based on buildout requirements by either the PCS H block or the LightSquared spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's entirely possible that they were anticipating an increase in their network footprint based on buildout requirements by either the PCS H block or the LightSquared spectrum.

 

That sounds somewhat similar to a thread that I seem to recall AJ starting last year indicating that Sprint may be inclined to start offering service in a number of BEAs where it doesn't currently have native coverage. The purpose of this would be to satisfy substantial service requirements related to their PCS G block licenses. I believe that he mentioned the buildout deadline is sometime in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The purpose of the graphic was not to show post NV Sprint native network coverage. You are looking for more than what that image represented.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

:goodpost:                                                                                                                                                                                        

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That sounds somewhat similar to a thread that I seem to recall AJ starting last year indicating that Sprint may be inclined to start offering service in a number of BEAs where it doesn't currently have native coverage. The purpose of this would be to satisfy substantial service requirements related to their PCS G block licenses. I believe that he mentioned the buildout deadline is sometime in 2016.

:fingers:

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted your coverage map on Google+. One of the comments that I received said, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have more coverage than that and Sprint has less coverage than that.

 

Goes to show how Sprint's reputation alone prevents people from seeing the progress they make. It's really weird.

 

Maybe they need to go the HTC route and become super transparent to gain back subscribers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted your coverage map on Google+. One of the comments that I received said, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have more coverage than that and Sprint has less coverage than that.

 

Goes to show how Sprint's reputation alone prevents people from seeing the progress they make. It's really weird.

 

Maybe they need to go the HTC route and become super transparent to gain back subscribers.

haters_fb62b5_2448292.gif

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted your coverage map on Google+. One of the comments that I received said, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have more coverage than that and Sprint has less coverage than that.

 

Goes to show how Sprint's reputation alone prevents people from seeing the progress they make. It's really weird.

 

Maybe they need to go the HTC route and become super transparent to gain back subscribers.

 

Yea did the same, posted the maps in a mac rumors thread in the forum titles "sprint is pathetic " , and the response was.. Well the one that Verizon uses is actually more accurate.

 

Even when you present the facts on the issue, it's ignored or they know you are from S4GRU.com and criticize this website and it's users because the facts are presented.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea did the same, posted the maps in a mac rumors thread in the forum titles "sprint is pathetic " , and the response was.. Well the one that Verizon uses is actually more accurate.

 

Even when you present the facts on the issue, it's ignored or they know you are from S4GRU.com and criticize this website and it's users because the facts are presented.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

How can they deny that so many officially launched cities are missing from Verizon's map?

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted your coverage map on Google+. One of the comments that I received said, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T have more coverage than that and Sprint has less coverage than that.

 

Goes to show how Sprint's reputation alone prevents people from seeing the progress they make. It's really weird.

 

Maybe they need to go the HTC route and become super transparent to gain back subscribers.

3032192.jpg

 

Edit: just wanted to chime in a little more. Lol my friends were sitting in my apartment last night which is now on the 1st floor and an absolute black hole for Sprint. Friend did a speed test on ATT and he was clocking 6 down. Let me tell you, 800 can't get here quick enough lol. However, sprint is sending me a free airave based on my 20 dropped calls in less than a day. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Perception is reality. Until Sprint has a demonstrably better network they will remain a distant third. Certainly that's the case in my area.

Well obviously. People aren't going to switch to an incomplete network unless LTE is in their area or the pricing is right for them. And Sprint will remain a distant third from ATT and Verizon for a while. Taking over those 2 isn't something that can be accomplished quickly. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well obviously. People aren't going to switch to an incomplete network unless LTE is in their area or the pricing is right for them. And Sprint will remain a distant third from ATT and Verizon for a while. Taking over those 2 isn't something that can be accomplished quickly. 

 

The existing network footprint should be pretty much fixed by the end of this year, but perception always lags reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...