Jump to content

LG Volt (LG F90) (was LG LS740)


MacinJosh

Recommended Posts

Update: LG at MWC has inadvertently outed the LG LS740 as the LG Volt, Sprint's next mid-range Spark phone. Please see this post for details.

 

The LG LS740 article, LG's first mid-range tri-band for Sprint in 2014, is now up on the wall.

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-359-lg-ls740-could-it-be-a-midrange-rf-powerhouse/

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the 20mhz and 10mhz in b25 and b41, mean it'll pull better speeds than my G2?

No, it'll just support greater bandwidth for larger carriers in band 25 if Sprint decides to deploy them.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5S using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesnt greater bandwith = faster speeds? Or what does it mean

 

You mean like Sprint's 20MHz Band 41 carrier?  Yes, it sure does.  Especially when they start aggregating these large carriers before any other provider.  A wider channel is capable of faster speeds.  However, even smaller LTE carriers are faster than people's needs.

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean like Sprint's 20MHz Band 41 carrier?  Yes, it sure does.  Especially when they start aggregating these large carriers before any other provider.  A wider channel is capable of faster speeds.  However, even smaller LTE carriers are faster than people's needs.

 

Robert

5mbps more than enough.  people just like big numbers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol but really, now it doesn't matter TWC is going to get 50mbps by the end of the year, not that I need that, but I love having the speed for anything. Now, I only needabout 1 - 3mbps lte speeds for streaming music.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol but really, now it doesn't matter TWC is going to get 50mbps by the end of the year, not that I need that, but I love having the speed for anything. Now, I only needabout 1 - 3mbps lte speeds for streaming music.

charter isp speed after going digital will be 60mbps.  http://www.cedmagazine.com/news/2014/01/charter-to-increase-data-speeds

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I was just in Greenwich, CT doing some shopping and naturally also doing some recording of cell sites in the background on Cellmapper. Specifically I was along Greenwich Ave which is the most dense part of the city. Verizon: Literally didn't work most of the time. Even though their coverage shows the entire city blanketed in 5GUW you'll only be on their nationwide 5G network or LTE if you're anywhere south of Lewis St. Regular 5G (non C-band) didn't work at all. I don't mean it was slow, I mean it didn't pass any data at all. When I opened Instagram it told me "No connection". In a store I was in I even overheard someone asking another shopper if they had service in the store. I immediately knew they were on Verizon. Switching to LTE gave me data although it was slow. In most stores I'd get speeds in the low teens, outside it'd go up to 40Mbps. Above Lewis St. my phone finally connected to n77. On n77 I was seeing ~180Mbps. It seems like the issue isn't backhaul, it's just that Verizon doesn't have any remaining capacity on the LTE side.   AT&T: AT&T was slow but didn't suffer from the same "No data connection" issue that Verizon did. Speeds were in the low teens most of the time and peaked around 50Mbps. My phone hopped between AT&T's nationwide 5G and LTE frequently much like Verizon. Also just like Verizon, north of Lewis St. I suddenly connected to 5G+ which gave me speeds just over 100Mbps. AT&T also at least one small cell along Greenwich Ave for additional capacity and coverage and it's doing wonders for their network in the area. I'd go as far as saying it's probably the only reason they're not in the same situation as Verizon.   T-Mobile: Not to sound like an ad for the company but I was really blown away by T-Mobile's performance here. T-Mobile is collocated on the same towers as Verizon and AT&T in the region but they have an extra site in the steeple a church along Greenwich Ave that they've upgraded with n41. As a result, T-Mobile not only has the strongest signal indoors and outdoors, they also have the fastest speeds by a long shot. Nowhere along the commercial strip did I drop below 500Mbps. Indoors I was seeing over 300Mbps and outdoors I peaked at over 600Mbps. For the sake of testing I switched my phone to LTE and saw speeds of 180Mbps indoors.  
    • This site, along with T-Mobile eNB 307360, don't have B41 live, but do have n41 live. Seems like the latest T-Mobile convert sites don't broadcast B41 at all.
    • Sprint eNB 9493/5784 -> T-Mobile eNB 216213 Located at: 40.61611028489374, -74.01141959254353 Sprint eNB 6786 is converted but not live Located at: 40.647096399275, -73.97984672978991  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...