Jump to content

Network Vision and Spark EARFCN logging thread


Recommended Posts

Let me see what I can do about a screen shot...

 

That would be great.  But be precise about location.  Said engineering screen cap basically would need to come from St. Louis proper to be conclusive -- because the Chicago MTA extends surprisingly close to St. Louis exurbs on the Illinois side.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • EARFCN 8615 (downlink) [Chillicothe, Ohio (Ross County)]
  • EARFCN 26615 (uplink) [Chillicothe, Ohio (Ross County)]

source: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/4742-columbus-market-mapspreadsheet/page-187&do=findComment&comment=411896

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was simply replying to the post above mine that basically the 2nd LTE carrier is more widespread across this region than South Bend.

 

 

 

Let me see what I can do about a screen shot...

I haven't seen any reports of a second carrier in the St. Louis area.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ, here's another 40254 like a few posts up from the Chicago market second carrier FIT.

084cee12d654fd053f2f3717b6b4b8c8.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Keep an eye on that TX value. I don't have an iphone, so I can't keep an eye on it myself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep an eye on that TX value. I don't have an iphone, so I can't keep an eye on it myself.

I always do, although I'm not sure if I should. One of our knowledgable staff members would know more than me if MIMO would be part of this phase of network vision.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I haven't seen any reports of a second carrier in the St. Louis area.

 

This is my error. First time being outside a Samsung market. Apparently Sector 03 doesn't translate as a 2nd LTE carrier outside of Samsung.  :blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

41176 no longer restricted to Kansas City, also Zanesville Ohio for their b41 second carrier:

0e4e4654abefaa3f9356d35546d7ba2e.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

2nd PCS LTE carrier found in Flint,  MI

 

 

 

It translates to 1876.8 / 1956.8 MHz which is within the the 30 mhz 1870-1885 / 1950-1965

 PCS B block allocation that Sprint has in East Michigan. 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd PCS LTE carrier found in Flint,  MI

attachicon.gifScreenshot_2015-07-05-13-27-04.png

It translates to 1876.8 / 1956.8 MHz which is within the the 30 mhz 1870-1885 / 1950-1965

 PCS B block allocation that Sprint has in East Michigan. 

 

Top post updated.  Band 41 spreadsheet updated.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

B25 second carrier, Danville, IL

bdc83eb000c1a09358b955d38d67dc2f.jpg243453461eca314a4672fba1e9a18a6d.jpgb596310a25638d40a9f84fa85eb3f42c.jpg

 

Possible 10x10 between Indianapolis and Ohio border after Cincinnati market:

0cf787277761f1b171cf82cde15f36cb.jpg7a5356474896826d68f91aa3fe9f771f.jpg966a7e76a7c7a4f34f1a95574e01f229.jpg

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Normal, IL: 918152f095cf4b62e22d0c1adf5857c0.jpg

 

Plus lots of second carrier set various points since Danville.

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed that 8315/26315 second carrier when I was making a delivery down in Danville a few weeks ago, and I meant to ask about it. That's the same spectrum used in the Chicagoland area for a second carrier. Did the USCC purchase include this area, too?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOLA B41

 

First carrier 40978

Second carrier 41176

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Screen shots are best

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NOLA B41

 

First carrier 40978

Second carrier 41176

Screen shots are best

 

Either way, does not really matter.  Those are run of the mill band 41 EARFCNs across numerous markets.  So, they do not really tell us anything new, though it is nice to know that New Orleans has two band 41 carriers running, probably 2x CA, too.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
    • At some point over the weekend, T-Mobile bumped the Omaha metro from 100+40 to 100+90 of n41! That's a pretty large increase from what we had just a few weeks ago when we were sitting at 80+40Mhz. Out of curiosity, tested a site on my way to work and pulled 1.4Gpbs. That's the fastest I've ever gotten on T-Mobile! For those that know Omaha, this was on Dodge street in Midtown so not exactly a quiet area!
    • Did you mean a different site? eNB ID 112039 has been around for years. Streetview even has it with C-band back in 2022 - https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7303042,-73.9610924,3a,24.1y,18.03h,109.66t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1s2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g!2e0!5s20220201T000000!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3D2ossx06yU56AYOzREdcK-g%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D18.027734930682684%26pitch%3D-19.664180274382204%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu Meanwhile, Verizon's eNB 84484 in Fort Greene has been updated to include C-band and CBRS, but not mmWave. I've seen this a few times now on updated Verizon sites where it's just the CBRS antenna on its own, not in a shroud and without mmWave. Odd.
    • Drove out into the country today.  Dish stuck to my phone like glue. At least -120 rsrp. Likely only good for phone calls (should have tested.) It then switched to T-Mobile. Getting back on Dish was another issue. I am used to dragging out coverage so I expected a few miles, but had to drive at least 10 miles towards a Dish site. Airplane mode, which worked for Sprint, did nothing. Rebooting did nothing. Finally got it to change over about 2 miles from the site by manually setting the carrier to Dish then it had great reception. Sprint used to have a 15 minute timeout but I did not have the patience today.  Previously I did a speed test on Dish out in the country at the edge of Dish coverage. My speeds were 2g variety. Dish has really overclocked some of these sites. Seen rssp readings in the 50s. Would have called them boomer sites with Sprint but much  more common with Dish.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...