Jump to content

Sprint Wifi Calling.....


runagun

Recommended Posts

Why have this restriction at all? This calling should be allowed to work in Africa. Why limit something useful.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Perhaps a premium International version in the future for $5-$10 a month? Only thing I can come up with...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps a premium International version in the future for $5-$10 a month? Only thing I can come up with...

International folks mostly all use line, video, or whatsapp so no one in their right mind would pay for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be glib, but Sprint already has Wi-Fi calling.  It is Google Voice integration plus GrooVe IP.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in a few months.

 

I have heard about third party developers being shut out of the Google Voice API.  You are certainly better versed in that realm than I am.  But are you sure that GrooVe IP will be affected?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard about third party developers being shut out of the Google Voice API.  You are certainly better versed in that realm than I am.  But are you sure that GrooVe IP will be affected?

 

AJ

 

All third party google voice apps and devices are getting disabled on 15th May 2014.

 

People are hoping that it means voice is coming to the Hangout application on Android, just like it is on the iOS app.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard about third party developers being shut out of the Google Voice API. You are certainly better versed in that realm than I am. But are you sure that GrooVe IP will be affected?

 

AJ

http://androidcommunity.com/groove-ip-shutting-down-due-to-google-voice-changes-20131104/

 

My Obi VOIP adapter will stop working with it as well. But hey.. I have had free home phone for 2+ years from them. Good run!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All third party google voice apps and devices are getting disabled on 15th May 2014.

 

People are hoping that it means voice is coming to the Hangout application on Android, just like it is on the iOS app.

Voice is already there. The video call ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is unfortunate.  I read the rumors a few months ago, but I half expected GrooVe IP to escape the executioner -- since it really latches onto Google Chat, not Google Voice.  That said, I have actually used GrooVe IP forwarding to my tablets all of I think four times in the last 18 months.  When I am available, I just do not make or take that many phone calls.

 

On one hand, I feel for snrb Labs, since it is losing a paid app.  But on the upside, if Google is reportedly taking VoIP in house, then likely it will employ a more efficient codec.  Google Chat forwarding to GrooVe IP uses G.711, which produces a 64 kbps voice payload, then TCP/IP routing data for a total of 80 kbps each direction.  A more modern codec should be able to produce similar "toll quality" voice at a much lower bit rate.  And that would be better for use over mobile airlinks.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://androidcommunity.com/groove-ip-shutting-down-due-to-google-voice-changes-20131104/

 

My Obi VOIP adapter will stop working with it as well. But hey.. I have had free home phone for 2+ years from them. Good run!

 

I've been using Ooma for the past 3 years and have never paid a bill other than the cost of the device (~$200) .  I will obviously ride this out till the phone adapter dies on me.  Ooma for new customers is still a good deal, as you only pay your local taxes.  Here in Baton Rouge, it's around $4/month.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using Ooma for the past 3 years and have never paid a bill other than the cost of the device (~$200) . I will obviously ride this out till the phone adapter dies on me. Ooma for new customers is still a good deal, as you only pay your local taxes. Here in Baton Rouge, it's around $4/month.

I think I am going to look around for a DID for inbound usage as we don't call out much on the phone. Not sure yet. I have several VOIP boxes around as I used to write some plugins for Sipura and they sent me one of each model for testing. Speaking of Sipura, smart guys, selling the same their company twice to the same folks and coming back to do it a third time.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am going to look around for a DID for inbound usage as we don't call out much on the phone. Not sure yet. I have several VOIP boxes around as I used to write some plugins for Sipura and they sent me one of each model for testing. Speaking of Sipura, smart guys, selling the same their company twice to the same folks and coming back to do it a third time.

 

I use onesuite.com with a Linksys PAP2T for outgoing calls, used it for maybe 5 years, pretty reliable. I think they charge $3 per month if you want a number, can port too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grooveip, google voice..  Not the same thing as having fully integrated wifi calling and SMS like T-mobile has.  It's totally seamless, you don't have to change any of your habits to use it, works anywhere in the world where you have wifi.  Hopefully Sprint's solution will be just as tightly integrated and available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if this could be a work around "fix" for Airave's and tri-band phones without needing to disable LTE at home.

That's a theory for sure. The firmware on the phones has not yet been released. Just realize, you will need wifi at the location, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been using Ooma for the past 3 years and have never paid a bill other than the cost of the device (~$200) .  I will obviously ride this out till the phone adapter dies on me.  Ooma for new customers is still a good deal, as you only pay your local taxes.  Here in Baton Rouge, it's around $4/month.

 

Looks like I'll be doing the Obivoice thing on the Obi adapter.  The $25 a year for 500 minutes a month sounds perfect.  Hard to beat $2 a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's good when coverage just sucks. When I had t-mobile I was in the hospital and had almost no coverage, dropped calls and all. Turned on the wifi and bam calling all good. Clear as ever. This was standard on t-mobile and used the same rules that sprint is going to employ.

 

Sent from my One using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Grooveip, google voice..  Not the same thing as having fully integrated wifi calling and SMS like T-mobile has.  It's totally seamless, you don't have to change any of your habits to use it, works anywhere in the world where you have wifi.  Hopefully Sprint's solution will be just as tightly integrated and available.

 

I disagree.  The Google Voice plus GrooVe IP open system has been great because it is not limited to just one "Wi-Fi calling" handset.  Ringing through to tablets, laptops, and other devices is pretty cool.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would be awesome for my situation. I'm in a semi-rural area on an MSC boundary. My calls don't handoff well between the two sites and we deal with a lot of cell breathing. CDMA800 will be very helpful when it shows up, but until then I could hook my phone to my hotspot for reliable calling.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this an extension (or clone?) of what Republic Wireless is trying to do? And does Republic's plan require you to have a cdma signal? Just curious. Would certainly prefer to use a standard phone like the n5 on sprint instead of a tricked out special phone that is only good on the republic plan.

 

Jim, Sent from my Photon 4G using Tapatalk 2

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...