Jump to content

Sprint Announces Private Placement Offering of Notes


lil_jimmy_norton

Recommended Posts

Without the backhaul vendors getting off their collective asses, I am not sure if anything could really increase the rate of the network improvements. It is nice to see that Sprint is looking at other means of raising funds, though. To compete against the duopoly, it's going to take major investments.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20131209-904227.html?dsk=y

 

 

Looks like Sprint is raising more money.  Hopefully we will see some increased rollout speed on all fronts with this.

 

Maybe, could also just be issuing new debt to pay off current debt that's coming due next year. Not sure what they have coming up in 2015 though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without the backhaul vendors getting off their collective asses, I am not sure if anything could really increase the rate of the network improvements. It is nice to see that Sprint is looking at other means of raising funds, though. To compete against the duopoly, it's going to take major investments.

Why is backhaul so delayed?  We have several areas in Westchester that are NV 3G complete yet the data still crawls along at dialup speeds.  And I know some of it has to be god awful Cablevision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is backhaul so delayed? We have several areas in Westchester that are NV 3G complete yet the data still crawls along at dialup speeds. And I know some of it has to be god awful Cablevision.

where in Westchester are you referring? I have been working in New Rochelle and 3g speed is terrible.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is backhaul so delayed? We have several areas in Westchester that are NV 3G complete yet the data still crawls along at dialup speeds. And I know some of it has to be god awful Cablevision.

God awful Cablevision is great in NYC. They are the backhaul vendors for Brooklyn and the Bronx which happen to be the furthest ahead for LTE in the entire city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

where in Westchester are you referring? I have been working in New Rochelle and 3g speed is terrible.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

The Eastchester area is almost fully LTE and 3G NV.  There are some towers though that are NV 3G on the old backhaul still and have been there for awhile.  There is one tower in the Hartsdale parking lot at the train station that has had NV equipment installed, but for whatever reason has yet to have upgraded backhaul.  It is truly amazing how the vast majority of the towers I connect too have been upgraded.  It was well worth the wait, but Sprint has to keep pushing the pace along to compete.

 

God awful Cablevision is great in NYC. They are the backhaul vendors for Brooklyn and the Bronx which happen to be the furthest ahead for LTE in the entire city.

I was under the impression that they were doing Manhattan as well.  As for Cablevision I dislike that company for many reasons, but the number one reason is James Dolan.  I did have Cablevision, but I switched to Verizon FiOS and I have to say the difference is night and day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Eastchester area is almost fully LTE and 3G NV.  There are some towers though that are NV 3G on the old backhaul still and have been there for awhile.  There is one tower in the Hartsdale parking lot at the train station that has had NV equipment installed, but for whatever reason has yet to have upgraded backhaul.  It is truly amazing how the vast majority of the towers I connect too have been upgraded.  It was well worth the wait, but Sprint has to keep pushing the pace along to compete.

 

 

I was under the impression that they were doing Manhattan as well.  As for Cablevision I dislike that company for many reasons, but the number one reason is James Dolan.  I did have Cablevision, but I switched to Verizon FiOS and I have to say the difference is night and day.

 

Too bad FiOS is patchy as ever here. Barely any service throughout Brooklyn. And on Optimum you get WiFi througout NYC and a few other cities in the country. Not to mention speed tiers are just as fast as FiOS now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm wonder if they are raising money for the 600mhz auction... From what I understand, that is going is going to be very expensive for both the licenses AND the equipment needed to run it.

 

No need to pay interest on that money until they actually need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe, could also just be issuing new debt to pay off current debt that's coming due next year. Not sure what they have coming up in 2015 though. 

 

Year Amt(Mln) 2014 181 2015 500 2016 2,300 2017 3,015 2018 3,000 2019 1,729 2020 2,500 2021 3,250 2022 2,480 2023 4,250 2024 2,500 2028 2,475 2032 2,000 2040 629

 

Total Debt    30,809.903    USD

Total Issues    24

Issuer    Starburst I Inc    Group    Current issuer and its subsidiaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Year Amt(Mln) 2014 181 2015 500 2016 2,300 2017 3,015 2018 3,000 2019 1,729 2020 2,500 2021 3,250 2022 2,480 2023 4,250 2024 2,500 2028 2,475 2032 2,000 2040 629

 

Total Debt    30,809.903    USD

Total Issues    24

Issuer    Starburst I Inc    Group    Current issuer and its subsidiaries

 

 

Wow, their total debt really has balooned, between buying Clearwire and NV. They better start making money soon. I wonder how bad is T-Mobile's debt load? You wouldn't happen to have that info handy, would you?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, their total debt really has balooned, between buying Clearwire and NV. Thye better start making money soon. I wonder how bad is T-Mobile's debt load? You wouldn't happen to have that info handy, would you?

 

Hard to compare the two, but here you go.  T-Mobile has a great debt structure.

 

 

Year Amt(Mln) 2018 1,500 2019 1,250 2020 2,250 2021 3,000 2022 2,250 2023 2,350 2024 1,000

 

Total Debt    13,600    USD

Total Issues    13

 

Issuer    T-Mobile US Inc    Group    Current issuer and its subsidiaries

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to compare the two, but here you go.  T-Mobile has a great debt structure.

 

 

Year Amt(Mln) 2018 1,500 2019 1,250 2020 2,250 2021 3,000 2022 2,250 2023 2,350 2024 1,000

 

Total Debt    13,600    USD

Total Issues    13

 

Issuer    T-Mobile US Inc    Group    Current issuer and its subsidiaries

 

Does it include Metro's debt?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't they have to take a write down last quarter on the iPhone. Write downs equates to loss of income, and they did make the largest deal to Apple in the face of a declining ecosystem. My  opinion was that they paid too much too late, and had they waited, or been more abreast of things would have know that Apple had already peaked in the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are Softbank's pockets not deep enough?

Uh, we already have a thread.  You will be packing up and relocating there shortly...

 

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/5161-sprint-announces-private-placement-offering-of-notes/

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
    • Verizon site at Woodbury Commons finally got C-band. I'm seeing upwards of 600Mbps there, a massive improvement over the <1Mbps I used to see. LTE is now at 10-20Mbps which is significantly better than before where speed tests would often fail. My only complaint is that C-band is super inconsistent. Not sure if it's a software issue but sometimes I'm connected to it and get the 600Mbps speeds previously mentioned and other times I connect and only see 15Mbps. Seems like whatever load balancing the network is trying to do is still shoving a ton of people to LTE, even in conditions where I have a strong C-band signal.  — — — — — You're absolutely right. The site on top of Bais Sarah Hall at 6101 16th Ave got decommissioned. Sad that they haven't installed a new site to fill in that coverage gap.  — — — — — In other news a carrier reached out to the board of my grandmother's building in Brooklyn about installing antennas on top of it so she called me today because she knows I map cell towers and she said a lot of people in her building, especially the folks on the upper floors, are worried about the health effects lol. I asked her if she knew what carrier it would be but she said she doesn't know. A quick glance at Cellmapper tells me it's either Dish or AT&T since Verizon and T-Mobile both have sites within a two block radius of her building but AT&T barely builds new sites so I'm leaning Dish. They're asking for a 25-year lease with an option to renegotiate the lease after 10-years. The board of her co-op said that if they do it, maintenance fees will go down since they'll be offset by the rent that the carrier would be paying them. She said she already voted in favor of it but she thinks that a lot of the older people in her building are against it.
    • Galaxy S7 FE most certainly doesn't have the same level of NR CA (if at all), it also looks like it doesn't have SA NR, so it's is inherently going to be much slower since most of the spectrum is now focused on NR rather than LTE. It's likely the same generation radio as the S21 (or maybe S20). Having trouble finding which it would be.
    • T-Mobile seems to be paying close attention to how much of B2 they refarm for NR, as on this trip down to South Padre Island I saw both 20x20 n25 and 20x20 B2 (but not both simultaneously) at various points on the trip. At South Padre itself, seems like someone else has 2.5 GHz licensed so the n41 setup here is 20+80 MHz. Speeds are still decent, but VZW has 100+60 MHz n77 live (and AT&T has some 80+40).
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...