Jump to content
Sim-X

Is HD Voice now on? Mine appears to be working

Recommended Posts

Sprint-to-Sprint sounded better than Sprint-to-Landline. Makes me wonder if there needs to be anything more done on the backend...

 

Calls to landlines will not benefit, as those will almost certainly be transcoded to PCM with an 8 kHz sample rate at some point.  In other words, those calls will not have an extended frequency range.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calls to landlines will not benefit, as those will almost certainly be transcoded to PCM with an 8 kHz sample rate at some point. In other words, those calls will not have an extended frequency range.

 

AJ

Like copying a CD to a cassette tape.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like copying a CD to a cassette tape.

Or a Blu-Ray to a DVD for us young folks.   ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Calls to landlines will not benefit, as those will almost certainly be transcoded to PCM with an 8 kHz sample rate at some point.  In other words, those calls will not have an extended frequency range.

 

AJ

AJ, does the "rate_reduc:0" mean that the rate hasn't been reduced?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see it's working for others. Mine doesn't work all the time depends on where I am and who I'm talking with. Is this something the other carriers might pick up? Would love to see sprint to verizon support but one thing at a time. This took for absolutely ever for them to get it working.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad to see it's working for others. Mine doesn't work all the time depends on where I am and who I'm talking with. Is this something the other carriers might pick up? Would love to see sprint to verizon support but one thing at a time. This took for absolutely ever for them to get it working.

No other carrier is going to deploy EVRC-NW. Verizon is going to use VoLTE (can't remember it's codec) and AT&T and T-Mobile are in the 3GPP way of doing things and thus use AMR and not EVRC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AJ, does the "rate_reduc:0" mean that the rate hasn't been reduced?

 

I expect so, though "enginerring" screens are often a bit loose and vague in their terminology.

 

But EVRC-B -- of which EVRC-NW is basically an HD Voice extension -- allows a network controlled tradeoff between fidelity and capacity.  When the network starts to run low on capacity, it can reduce the number of rate 1 frames allowed, forcing more rate 1/2 frames as the highest encoded bit rate, thereby improving Ec/Io but lowering voice quality.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... All Sprint Devices were showing either Service Option 73, or EVRC-NW (the LG OG showed EVRC-NW). All calls were on PCS, connected to a 3G NV site, except for the landline (obviously). ...

So are you saying that the LG Optimus G can do HD-Voice? That is the very first time i have heard someone confirm HD-Voice on this handset for sprint! :) How do I pull up the engineering screen on the Optimus G?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the iPhone 5S support HD voice?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk

 

Bump, haven't been able to find anything on this either...

 

(And does it require 1x800? Or just an NV upgraded site?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So are you saying that the LG Optimus G can do HD-Voice? That is the very first time i have heard someone confirm HD-Voice on this handset for sprint! :) How do I pull up the engineering screen on the Optimus G?

Well, my co-worker's Optimus G either absolutely can do it, or the Enginerring Screen was lying to me.

 

I don't have an OG in front of me right now, but most engineering screens are gotten to by opening the Phone Dialer, and inputting "##33284#" (that's ##DEBUG#). If it asks for a lock code, it's 777468 (SPRINT), but I think only Samsung devices require that.

 

Calls to landlines will not benefit, as those will almost certainly be transcoded to PCM with an 8 kHz sample rate at some point.  In other words, those calls will not have an extended frequency range.

 

AJ

As an aside, I just remembered that my "landline" call wasn't to a physical landline at all; it was to a VoIP phone. I'm no expert, but depending on the way the call is switched, couldn't it still take some advantage of the enhanced quality?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, I just remembered that my "landline" call wasn't to a physical landline at all; it was to a VoIP phone. I'm no expert, but depending on the way the call is switched, couldn't it still take some advantage of the enhanced quality?

 

Doubtful.  From the Sprint network, the call almost undoubtedly hit the POTS network for transfer to the VoIP provider's network.  If so, that middle leg would be at POTS quality.

 

AJ

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No other carrier is going to deploy EVRC-NW. Verizon is going to use VoLTE (can't remember it's codec) and AT&T and T-Mobile are in the 3GPP way of doing things and thus use AMR and not EVRC.

 

VoLTE is AMR-WB (AMR wide-band).  Why is Sprint not doing VoLTE?  Circuit switching is old technology.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VoLTE is AMR-WB (AMR wide-band).  Why is Sprint not doing VoLTE?  Circuit switching is old technology.

They will do VoLTE eventually, it's just going to take a while. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VoLTE is AMR-WB (AMR wide-band).  Why is Sprint not doing VoLTE?  Circuit switching is old technology.

I cannot comment for why Sprint isn't but i will say from extensive voip testing that circuit switched calls are the highest quality/most reliable. I'll keep zipped on my opinions regarding channel width and the problems/benifits that follow.

-William

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alcatel-Lucent region in SoCal, sepcifically San Diego Market, is definitely on HD Voice. Between HTC One and iPhone awesome voice. First noticed yesterday after actually understanding my wife in a phone call for once..(She speaks incredibly fast and has ADD)....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VoLTE is AMR-WB (AMR wide-band).  Why is Sprint not doing VoLTE?  Circuit switching is old technology.

 

VoLTE requires at least AMR-NB, but AMR-WB (3GPP HD voice) is encouraged. There is a push to include AAC-ELB (Full HD Voice) as well. My hope is that Sprint will be able to hold back until Full HD is standardized so it will be supported on all Sprint VoLTE devices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VoLTE will not be a great idea until there is extensive 800 MHz coverage for one.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alcatel-Lucent region in SoCal, sepcifically San Diego Market, is definitely on HD Voice. Between HTC One and iPhone awesome voice. First noticed yesterday after actually understanding my wife in a phone call for once..(She speaks incredibly fast and has ADD)....

Screenshot a 1X engineering screen during a call and then you'll really know for if it's EVRC-NW (HD voice).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VoLTE is AMR-WB (AMR wide-band).  Why is Sprint not doing VoLTE?  Circuit switching is old technology.

 

Let me guess -- this is what you have heard.  Now, do you really know what you are talking about?  If so, state your case.  Otherwise, your advocacy of VoLTE is lunacy.

 

AJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screenshot a 1X engineering screen during a call and then you'll really know for if it's EVRC-NW (HD voice).

I've been getting that here in Visalia for sure since right after I got my Nexus 5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

 

uploadfromtaptalk1387432765400.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been getting that here in Visalia for sure since right after I got my Nexus 5.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Oh that's neat, I'm surprised under Service Options it says the codec and not 73.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh that's neat, I'm surprised under Service Options it says the codec and not 73.

Nexus 5. I think things in general display differently.

 

 

Sent from Josh's iPhone 5 using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Screenshot a 1X engineering screen during a call and then you'll really know for if it's EVRC-NW (HD voice).

How do you go into debug when on a call. I got on Optimus G, if it makes a difference.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you go into debug when on a call. I got on Optimus G, if it makes a difference.

 

Sent from my LG-LS970 using Tapatalk

When in the the call, in the dial pad type in ##DEBUG# and then select 1X engineering. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • LTE or LTE B? would be good.  I personally prefer to know that it is unknown.  Thanks!
    • Shoot me a diagnostic if you can catch this again! Invalid signal levels should automatically be filtered out.   Yeah, B66 and B71 are natively reported wrong on many devices due to an Android bug. SignalCheck tries to catch these and report them as B66/B71, but it's tricky because in some instances the incorrect band is actually a possible valid result. I'm not aware of B7 showing up, if someone catches that please send a diagnostic.. it is likely B66/B71 being reported incorrectly but not getting caught.
    • The report you sent showed the app was displaying B2 and the icon at the time was also B2--I checked the graphics to make sure the B2 icon didn't actually say B71, LOL.. if it happens again send another report! I don't recall any recent reports of the notification icon falling out of sync with the app itself.
    • Your G4 is running Android 6.0, which does not report EARFCN info. SignalCheck is displaying it as band 41 because PLMN ID 311490 is leading it to believe that it is a former Clear site, so it defaults to B41 unless another band is identified another way. With 311490 now being used during the merger transition, it's throwing things off. Unfortunately the app isn't going to be able to know if it's a Clear site or a merger-related thing.. perhaps I'll just remove the default band for now, since newer devices will be able to figure it out anyway. These multiple PLMNs are going to be even more problematic than they were before, because they aren't being used the same way in every market.
    • Because just like any other network, they can't guarantee coverage everywhere.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...