Jump to content

Verizon's Shammo: LTE capacity issues will be worked out by year-end


IamMrFamous07

Recommended Posts

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

 

Verizon doesn't hold anywhere near nationwide licenses of 700 MHz A block.  Verizon does have some nice 700 MHz A block licenses in some big markets but the cost to add this LTE band to its phones are not worth it.

 

I would much rather have Sprint keep their spectrum profile the way it is going into the 600 MHz auction.  Since all 4 of the major carriers plan to participate in the 600 MHz auction and the intention is to have 1 single LTE band for all the frequencies in the 600 MHz band, the cost for antennas, filters, etc will be chaper due to huge economies of scale.  Sprint has enough stuff on their plate and doesn't need this spectrum.  I would much rather have Sprint purchase nationwide licenses of the PCS H block in Jan 2014.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Verizon doesn't hold anywhere near nationwide licenses of 700 MHz A block. Verizon does have some nice 700 MHz A block licenses in some big markets but the cost to add this LTE band to its phones are not worth it.

 

I would much rather have Sprint keep their spectrum profile the way it is going into the 600 MHz auction. Since all 4 of the major carriers plan to participate in the 600 MHz auction and the intention is to have 1 single LTE band for all the frequencies in the 600 MHz band, the cost for antennas, filters, etc will be chaper due to huge economies of scale. Sprint has enough stuff on their plate and doesn't need this spectrum. I would much rather have Sprint purchase nationwide licenses of the PCS H block in Jan 2014.

Well said. I remember when sprint submitted their application for the 600 MHz auction they wanted to use TD LTE for their rollout is this still true?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said. I remember when sprint submitted their application for the 600 MHz auction they wanted to use TD LTE for their rollout is this still true?

 

I hope TD-LTE is not used for 600 MHz.  I want the 600 MHz band to be FDD LTE.  I know that Tmobile, ATT, Verizon and other carriers would complain if the 600 MHz spectrum was configured in TD-LTE blocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope TD-LTE is not used for 600 MHz. I want the 600 MHz band to be FDD LTE. I know that Tmobile, ATT, Verizon and other carriers would complain if the 600 MHz spectrum was configured in TD-LTE blocks.

Why not? What does fdd LTE have over TD LTE? I'm learning lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not? What does fdd LTE have over TD LTE? I'm learning lol

FDD LTE has better coverage overall and the version of LTE that is more widely deployed worldwide.  Not sure about this but I think FDD LTE would be more ideal for VoLTE than TD-LTE since you have symmetrical downlink and uplink frequency.  Sprint has to think of the future where they will need more low band spectrum for deployment for voice.  I hear that maybe some asian cell phone providers are testing with VoLTE calls over TD-LTE but I don't know the details.

 

I just know that Verizon, Tmobile and ATT would much rather have the 600 MHz blocks conducive for FDD LTE deployment rather than TD LTE and would complain if it wasn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The Verizon executive also touched on the company's 700 MHz A Block spectrum, which it has not yet sold after putting it on the block in 2012. "If a transaction makes sense, then we'll execute the transaction," he said. "If it doesn't, then we'll deploy it."

 

Idk much about the 700 MHz spectrum let a lone the A block spectrum but I do know sprint has stated they wanted more lower frequency spectrum. Do you think it will be smart for sprint to obtain some of it?

 

Or will it better if sprint waits for the 600mhz auction?

 

 

Read more http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizons-shammo-lte-capacity-issues-will-be-worked-out-year-end/2013-11-12

 

 

Random: Didn't sprint and cspire sign a roaming agreement for the 700 MHz spectrum

C Spire is using Sprint LTE where needed but it is not the other way around. My device would scan but not authenticate to C Spire LTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.theverge.com/2013/11/12/5097454/verizons-wireless-network-is-straining-under-demand-in-big-cities

 

Sure enough, these idiots on the Verge comments section turn it from Verizon bashing to Sprint bashing. :rolleyes:

Lol it's cool because those same people will end up becoming sprint customers in a couple years

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that we have 40-60 Mbps speeds being performed on the Sprint network in the field, I also see a potential shift in the customer base in the near future. It would be nice to see VoLTE soon with the possible addition of the 600 MHz spectrum. A quad-band LTE phone with simultaneous voice and data sounds like a nice upgrade from my current tri-band G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that we have 40-60 Mbps speeds being performed on the Sprint network in the field, I also see a potential shift in the customer base in the near future. It would be nice to see VoLTE soon with the possible addition of the 600 MHz spectrum. A quad-band LTE phone with simultaneous voice and data sounds like a nice upgrade from my current tri-band G2.

 

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

I'm sure there are plenty of customers out there who are closer to Ricky Bobby and just wanna go fast..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

 

Meow Meow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most people could care less about whether they have 40 megabits or 5, it's not going to have a "shift" of customers due to it.  The masses just care if their facebook pulls up and they can watch their cat videos on youtube.

 

I'm sure there are plenty of customers out there who are closer to Ricky Bobby and just wanna go fast..

 

Cat videos and ePenis comparisons may consume 90% of all bandwidth use....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I do appreciate is Verizon's honesty on this issue. Sprint should get used to making press releases like these and should have for its latest triband phone issue. The key is to never underestimate your customers and not say something because you don't believe they will understand it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad Verizon finally fessed up (sort of) to the bottlenecking I have observed in parts of their LTE network the past year. I have experienced more less than 1Mbps speed tests than greater than 20Mbps.

 

However, they make it sound like it's a few sites in just the largest cities in America. But it's in every state I have used VZW LTE service. Sometimes in small cities. In fact, the worst VZW LTE site I have ever encountered was in Farmington, New Mexico. Here in South Dakota, about 1/3 of the sites bog down below VZW's posted LTE speeds. And two will drop to 1Mbps or less. So this is not just a big city problem.

 

Verizon needs a denser LTE 750 network, and they need Band 4 LTE deployed nationwide. Not just the big cities. If they want to maintain their 70 share in places like Rapid City, they will need to overlay it all.

 

It sounds like VZW is on the case. However, I noticed these strains on their network over a year ago. And it has steadily degraded since even then.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://daringfireball.net/linked/2013/11/13/verizon-citiesJohn Gruber: "Verizon LTE has gone to s*** in Midtown Manhattan." More anecdotal evidence, but lots of people responding to him on Twitter back him up on it.

You don't have to tell me twice! My mom on Verizon can't use her iPhone in Midtown while I get more reliabke service than her on 3G and 4G.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...