Jump to content

OUTDATED: BTA's Not Meeting FCC Minimum Service Mandates


S4GRU
 Share

Recommended Posts

NOTE: This thread is outdated. Protection Sites are no longer being deployed since Sprint and Clearwire have both announced they are migrating to LTE for it's 4G technology. The information below is no longer accurate and should not be used. It is being retained just for historical purposes...

 

 

 

BTA's Not Meeting FCC Minimum Service Mandates (where more Protection Sites are anticipated...)

by Sprint 4G Rollout Updates on Friday, August 19, 2011 at 9:39 pm

 

 

 

I've created this thread as a way to track upcoming Protection Sites. I will keep this thread updated, removing BTA's (Basic Trading Areas) once they meet FCC Minimum Service Requirements, or change categories. See BTA listings below...

 

High Likelihood of Protection Site

These BTA's do not have any 2.5GHz service from Clearwire and thus do not meet FCC Minimum Service Requirements. These are highly likely to get at least one tower of service between now and the FCC Extended Deadline of November 1, 2011.

  • Arkansas > Harrison (BTA #182)
  • California > El Centro/Imperial (BTA #124)
  • California > San Luis Obispo (BTA #405)
  • Idaho > Idaho Falls/Rexburg/Salmon and Jackson WY (BTA #202)
  • Idaho > Pocatello/American Falls/Soda Springs (BTA #353)
  • Idaho > Twin Falls/Burley/Sun Valley (BTA #451)
  • Iowa > Burlington/Ft. Madison/Keokuk (BTA #61)
  • Iowa > Cedar Rapids (BTA #70)
  • Iowa > Dubuque (BTA #118)
  • Iowa > Fort Dodge/Storm Lake (BTA #150)
  • Iowa > Iowa City (BTA #205)
  • Iowa > Mason City (BTA #285)
  • Iowa > Ottumwa/Oskaloosa (BTA #337)
  • Iowa > Sioux City (BTA #421)
  • Kentucky > Corbin/London (BTA #98)
  • Kentucky > Pikeville (BTA #474)
  • Kentucky > Somerset (BTA #423)
  • Michigan > Alpena (BTA #11)
  • Michigan > Battle Creek (BTA #33)
  • Michigan > Escanaba/Manistique (BTA #132)
  • Michigan > Mt. Pleasant (BTA #307)
  • Michigan > Midland/Saginaw/Bay City (BTA #390)
  • Michigan > Petoskey/Cheboygan (BTA #345)
  • Michigan > Traverse City (BTA #446)
  • Minnesota > Brainerd (BTA #54)
  • Minnesota > Willmar/Montevideo (BTA #477)
  • Missouri > Poplar Bluff (BTA #355)
  • Missouri > West Plains (BTA #470)
  • Montana > Bozeman/Belgrade (BTA #53)
  • Montana > Butte (BTA #64)
  • Montana > Missoula (BTA #300)
  • Nebraska > Hastings (BTA #185)
  • Nebraska > McCook (BTA #270)
  • New Hampshire > Keene & Brattleboro VT (BTA #227)
  • New Mexico > Clovis/Portales (BTA #87)
  • New Mexico > Gallup and St. John's/Eagar, AZ (BTA #162)
  • New Mexico > Hobbs/Lovington (BTA #191)
  • New Mexico > Roswell/Ruidoso (BTA #386)
  • New York > Glens Falls/Lake George (BTA #164)
  • New York > Jamestown/Dunkirk and Warren PA (BTA #215)
  • New York > Oneonta/Delhi (BTA #333)
  • New York > Plattsburgh (BTA #352)
  • North Dakota > Dickinson (BTA #113)
  • North Dakota > Grand Forks/Devils Lake and Thief River Falls MN (BTA #166)
  • North Dakota > Minot (BTA #299)
  • North Dakota > Williston (BTA #476)
  • Ohio > Chillicothe (BTA #80)
  • Ohio > Lima (BTA #255)
  • Ohio > Zanesville (BTA # 487)
  • Pennsylvania > Allentown/Bethlehem/Easton (BTA #10)
  • Pennsylvania > Johnstown/Somerset (BTA #218)
  • Pennsylvania > Meadville (BTA #287)
  • Pennsylvania > Stroudsburg (BTA #435)
  • South Carolina > Anderson/Toccoa GA (BTA #16)
  • South Carolina > Greenwood (BTA #178)
  • South Dakota > Aberdeen/Mobridge (BTA #1)
  • South Dakota > Watertown (BTA #464)
  • Tennessee > Cookeville (BTA #96)
  • Texas > Del Rio/Eagle Pass (BTA #121)
  • Texas > San Angelo/Brady/Ozona (BTA #400)
  • Utah > Logan/Preston ID (BTA #258)
  • Utah > St. George/Cedar City (BTA #392)
  • Vermont > Rutland/Bennington (BTA #388)
  • Virginia > Charlottesville (BTA #75)
  • Virginia > Staunton (BTA #430)
  • Virgin Islands > All Areas (BTA #491)
  • Washington > Longview/Kelso (BTA #261)
  • West Virginia > Beckley/Lewisburg (BTA #35)
  • West Virginia > Clarksburg/Elkins (BTA #82)
  • West Virginia > Fairmont (BTA #137)
  • West Virginia > Logan (BTA #259)
  • West Virginia > Morgantown (BTA #306)
  • West Virginia > Princeton/Bluefield, VA/WV (BTA #48)
  • West Virginia > Weirton/Steubenville OH (BTA #430)
  • West Virginia > Wheeling/St. Clairsville OH (BTA #471)
  • Wisconsin > Wisconsin Rapids/Stevens Point (BTA #432)

 

Moderate Likelihood of Additional Protection Site(s)

These BTA's have some 2.5GHz service deployed, but definitely not enough to meet the FCC Minimum Service Requirement of 30% of BTA Population covered with useable signal.

  • California > San Diego County (BTA #482)
  • Puerto Rico > Mayaguez/Ponce (BTA #489)

 

Slight Chance of Additional Protection Site(s)

These BTA's have a decent amount of 2.5GHz service deployed, but appear slightly below meeting the FCC Minimum Service Requirement of 30% of BTA Population covered with useable signal.

  • Alaska > Juneau (BTA #221)
  • American Samoa > All Areas (BTA #492) - I have this one as slight because they may allow this license to lapse.
  • California > Fresno (BTA #157)
  • California > Santa Barbara/Santa Maria (BTA #406)
  • Guam > All Areas (BTA #490) - I have this one as slight because they may allow this license to lapse.
  • Hawaii > Kauai/Lihue (BTA #254)
  • Northern Mariana Islands > All Areas (BTA #493) - I have this one as slight because they may allow this license to lapse.
  • Oregon > Coos Bay/North Bend (BTA #97)

 

Not Likely any Additional Protection Site(s)

These BTA's appear to meet the FCC Minimum Service Requirement of 30% of BTA Population covered with useable signal.

  • Alaska > Anchorage (BTA #14)
  • Alaska > Fairbanks (BTA #136)
  • California > Bakersfield (BTA #28)
  • California > Chico/Paradise (BTA #79)
  • California > Eureka/Crescent City (BTA #134)
  • California > Los Angeles (BTA #262)
  • California > Merced (BTA #291)
  • California > Modesto (BTA #303)
  • California > Redding/Red Bluff (BTA #371)
  • California > Sacramento/Northern Sierras (BTA #389)
  • California > San Francisco/San Jose/Oakland (BTA #404)
  • California > Stockton (BTA #434)
  • California > Visalia (BTA #458)
  • California > Yuba City/Marysville (BTA #485)
  • Hawaii > Hawaii/Hilo & Kailua (BTA #190)
  • Hawaii > Maui/Molokai/Lanai (BTA #222)
  • Hawaii > Oahu/Honolulu (BTA #192)
  • Idaho > Boise (BTA #50)
  • Idaho > Lewiston/Moscow and Clarkston WA (BTA #250)
  • Nevada > Reno/Carson City/Elko and Mammoth Lakes CA (BTA #372)
  • Oregon > Bend/Redmond/Prineville (BTA #38)
  • Oregon > Eugene (BTA #133)
  • Oregon > Klamath Falls/Alturas CA (BTA #231)
  • Oregon > Medford/Grants Pass (BTA #288)
  • Oregon > Portland (BTA #358)
  • Oregon > Roseburg (BTA #385)
  • Oregon > Salem/Corvallis (BTA #395)
  • Puerto Rico > San Juan (BTA #488)
  • Washington > Aberdeen/Hoquiam (BTA #2)
  • Washington > Bellingham (BTA #36)
  • Washington > Bremerton (BTA #55)
  • Washington > Olympia (BTA #331)
  • Washington > Port Angeles (BTA #356)
  • Washington > Seattle/Tacoma (BTA #413)
  • Washington > Spokane/Pullman and Coeur d' Alene ID (BTA #425)
  • Washington > Walla Walla/Pendleton OR (BTA #460)
  • Washington > Wenatchee (BTA #468)
  • Washington > Yakima (BTA #482)

 

 

 

BTAmap081911.jpg

The Sprint 4G/Clearwire FCC BTA Map as of August 19, 2011.

 

A full resolution image of this map can be found at: http://4g.herronweb....TAmap081911.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Migrated from Original Forum. Originally Posted 8 January 2011

 

In the past few months I've read a lot about beam forming. I wish they had used that in their deployment of 2.5GHz. WiMax would have never had the bad wrap and seen as inferior to LTE. Oh, what should have been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By lilotimz
      Samsung TDD-LTE gear which are being utilized in Clearwire priority sites. .   Clearwire - Samsung TDD-LTE RRH SLS-BD106Q & Antennas           Samsung TD-LTE RRUs mounted behind BRS/EBS Antenna     Sprint 2500-2600 mhz TD-LTE Setup Note the Antennas are much thicker and fatter than the antennas being utilized by Sprint Network Vision.  
       

       
      Clearwire TD-LTE Base Station / Cabinet
      May be subject to change as TD-LTE sites start being integrated into the Network Vision setups.
       

       

       

       
      Happy Hunting!
        I'll clean the post up this weekend when I have more time.   Courtesy of Sbolen from Missouri market. Samsung TDD RRH SLS-BD104Q1
      Samsung TDD RRH SLS-BD106Q
    • By S4GRU
      S4GRU members, want to see your name up in lights? Here is your chance...The WiMax countdown clock is up on the front page of The Forums. http://s4gru.com/index.php?/index 
       
      As a fundraiser for S4GRU, you can claim "naming rights" to the WiMax countdown clock for a day for a $20 donation.  Now, who will step up to the plate and meet my challenge to keep the sponsorship going? Celebrate the shutdown of WiMax! Show your support for multiple B41 carriers and carrier aggregation. And, of course, see your name get recognized by tens of thousands of others around the country.  
       
      Just make a $20 PayPal donation, put "WiMax Countdown" in the message, and the clock is yours for a day (or more).   You can sponsor as many days as you like.  This is open to anyone, including S4GRU Staff.  Only banned members cannot participate.  Donations will counted toward your membership cumulative totals, including upgrades to Sponsor, Premier Sponsor and Honored Premier status. Donations will go to the next open day available to be Sponsored. We will not allow specific days to be selected.
       
      We are auctioning off the final day.  The highest bidder will get the Sponsor privileges of the final day. See post below for more info.  
       
      Help support S4GRU and be a part of history as WiMax fades off into the sunset. Click here to donate and Sponsor the WiMax Clock
    • By KD8JBF
      Found an article on FierceWireless speculating that Sprint may not jump into the AWS auction...Thoughts?
       
      http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/analyst-sprint-might-pass-fccs-spectrum-auctions/2014-04-04?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal
       
    • By KnarfOH
      I am presently customer of the old Clearwire for home internet service.  By twist of fate, there are no other high-speed internet providers in my area - NOTHING! - unless you consider satellite services.  Clearwire was reluctant to give me a CLEAR EXPRESS HUB and sign me up originally because my home is literally shown to be in a marginal area of service.  My lot was shown to be covered but not the adjacent lots (not sure how that happens?).  Anyway, they gave me the modem and I experience around 6 Mbps downloads and 1 Mbps uploads (with an outside antenna).  For someone coming off dial-up and satellite (Wildblue) these speeds were terrific!  I am happy!  I understand my service is not as good as many others, but for this area it is fabulous!   With the recent announcements that Clearwire's Wimax service will be phased out by the end of 2015 - I am on pins and needles waiting for the other shoe to drop.  I live in Canal Winchester (suburb of Columbus, OH) and would be devastated If I lost my Clearwire service and we are not part of some Sprint LTE upgrade that will allow us to obtain high-speed internet when Clearwire goes away   Why isn't Sprint more open about their future plans to provide service to areas they acquired from Clearwire, including types of services and time frames other then generalities that I sometimes see published.  The tower I ping off of is located in Columbus (moderate density housing) and I have to believe that Columbus (15th largest city in the USA) would be near the top.  The tower is 3 to 4 miles away.  

       

    • By lequonrobinson
      i wanted to know what round will maryland be in and is nv going underway in this market right now i have seen speeds 1.5 to 2 megs down consistantly before it was under 600 kps so i wanted to ask
  • Posts

    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
    • Did some exploring yesterday/last night and didn't find a shred of C-Band, including with my brand new US Mobile SIM. Did find 4CA CBRS but the site seemed backhaul constrained; both that plus 15x15 B2 and band-locked 2/66 got me 190 Mbps or so.
    • Did some more exploring yesterday/last night and I think I spotted some LAA downtown but didn't get a chance to confirm before it went away in favor of mmW, which also went away pretty quickly. Also saw another n66 site, as well as an n2 site, making AT&T the second carrier to run n2 DSS within a few miles of me. I think at this point they won't be able to advertise anything flashy, but due to the sheer amount of CA they're throwing at customers here they can keep their network at 50+ Mbps until they can deploy both 3.45 and 3.7, and that's probably enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...