Jump to content

LTE Plus / Enhanced LTE (was "Sprint Spark" - Official Name for the Tri-Band Network)


Recommended Posts

You sure that's CA? I've gotten speeds as high as 72 Mb per second for downlink and usually get around 10 to 13 Mb per second on my iPhone 6

Yes i am-most of the towers in my area have ca on them though i did not screenshot my engineering screen. Also this tower is in the top third for data traffic in the boston market so it is a fairly heavily used one. Before ca it would generally get 15-25 down on 2.5.

 

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt it will happen until devices support it. I'm guessing 2016.

 

They still could deploy another carrier and load balance on it no?.  Don't have to wait for a 3xCA phone to use it. 

 

Sprint could make things interesting too by having a dl only carrier, as the ul carriers are one less than the dl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

T

 

Sprint could make things interesting too by having a dl only carrier, as the ul carriers are one less than the dl.

Do You want to cause massive interference because that's how you cause massive interference.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would this cause interference?

 

TDD is configured to allocate a certain number of slots to downlink or uplink in a time period which determines the thoroughput of the "carrier" utilizing a TDD technology on unpaired spectrum such as TDD-LTE or WiMax. 

 

To prevent interference to adjacent channels, TDD setups must be configured in such a manner that the downlink, uplink, and guard slot between DL and UL are as close to each other as possible. Ex. Sprint Band 41 TDD-LTE has to take into account the Clear WiMax time ratio configuration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TDD is configured to allocate a certain number of slots to downlink or uplink in a time period which determines the thoroughput of the "carrier" utilizing a TDD technology on unpaired spectrum such as TDD-LTE or WiMax. 

 

To prevent interference to adjacent channels, TDD setups must be configured in such a manner that the downlink, uplink, and guard slot between DL and UL are as close to each other as possible. Ex. Sprint Band 41 TDD-LTE has to take into account the Clear WiMax time ratio configuration. 

 

Right.  But if Sprint has ample BRS/EBS spectrum, the carriers do not have to be adjacent.  Carriers with different TDD configurations or supplemental downlink CA could be placed as much as ~150 MHz apart in the BRS/EBS band plan.

 

Anyway, as much as I have been on the record for something like the last three years for BRS/EBS to be used as supplemental downlink CA, that is not going to happen soon, if ever.  It is not 3GPP standardized.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would this cause interference?

Yeah, I'd like to get educated as well.

 

As I see it, it is TDD, so that same 20MHz is used for both UL/DL and the ratio can be changed for more DL or more UL.  Making that carrier 100% DL I don't see how that can cause an issue with what is already TDD.  If required, and is easily doable, pad it with a guard or place that DL only carrier away from the ther carriers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I'd like to get educated as well.

 

As I see it, it is TDD, so that same 20MHz is used for both UL/DL and the ratio can be changed for more DL or more UL. Making that carrier 100% DL I don't see how that can cause an issue with what is already TDD. If required, and is easily doable, pad it with a guard or place that DL only carrier away from the ther carriers.

Except you can't do that. UEs are not compatible And you lock out a range of spectrum that can't be used for anything else. Place it in low 2500s you lock out everything around it up to high 2500s and likewise if you put it in the BRS range.

 

UEs are limited to configuration 1/2 due to time period of 5 ms. Ue are not compatible with 10 ms or other standardized TDD configurations.

 

The next configuration ratio change will be network wide for a more downlink oriented one a bit after Clearwire wimax shuts down.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just posting confirmation that CA from 2 different B41 towers can happen. This is sort of unique situation though, the primary connection is coming from a tower that does not have CA enabled, and the secondary connection is coming from a tower that does have CA enabled.

 

Screenshot_2015-09-07-20-07-19.png

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is good news though - I'm definitely not complaining. 1.9 expansion is great and 2.5 will help congestion in a lot of markets.

Seems outdated to me. Should have been announced a while ago. I doubt Sprint will have more than 200 spark markets by the end of the year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems outdated to me. Should have been announced a while ago. I doubt Sprint will have more than 200 spark markets by the end of the year.

You're probably right. Also, some places like Buffalo, NY still don't show as spark on the map...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're probably right. Also, some places like Buffalo, NY still don't show as spark on the map...

 

I've been checking since 12:01 am on the 11th to see which cities are covered in Green Bay to update our premier thread info... I'm guessing they're all getting side tracked by the iPhone!  ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey does anyone know how to tell if an iPhone is using CA in field test?

 

We won't know until people start using the 6s in CA areas.  The 6 does not do CA on Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I understand sprint is in the middle of adding 2xCA on 2.5GHz. If I am not wrong, sprint has on average 120 Mhz of spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band in 90 of the top 100 U.S. markets.


 


2.5 Ghz may not propagate far but the spectrum is excellent for capacity. 


 


Instead of deploying 2x20, why not roll out 3x20 and if i am being way too optimistic 4x20. Kill the competition basically and make you use of this large swath of spectrum now, instead of doing it in pieces while the competition zooms past them.


 


What is stopping them to do so ?


What are are the technological challenges to deploy 2x20, 3x20 simultaneously ? 

Edited by vkurani31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand sprint is in the middle of adding 2xCA on 2.5GHz. If I am not wrong, sprint has on average 120 Mhz of spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band in 90 of the top 100 U.S. markets.

 

2.5 Ghz may not propagate far but the spectrum is excellent for capacity. 

 

Instead of deploying 2x20, why not roll out 3x20 and if i am being way too optimistic 4x20. Kill the competition basically and make you use of this large swath of spectrum now, instead of doing it in pieces while the competition zooms past them.

 

What is stopping them to do so ?

What are are the technological challenges to deploy 2x20, 3x20 simultaneously ? 

I believe 3xCA/4xCA requires testing, just like every other thing that is rolled out. And also the backhaul requirements are there, too. Having 3xCA or 4xCA, one or two 5 MHz Band 25 carriers (maybe one 10 MHz and one 5 MHz carrier), a 5 MHz Band 26 carrier, and several carries of 1x and EVDO, on 3 different sectors really adds up in the amount of backhaul required. A lot of sites probably just don't have enough backhaul yet to support it.

 

There are other people on the site, such as Tim or Robert, that are much more knowledgeable on the subject than I am, so don't just take my word for it. I'm sure they will chime in soon. :)

 

-Anthony

 

edit: Also, like nick said, there aren't any devices out there that support 3xCA or 4xCA, so adding 3x and 4xCA wouldn't do anything. Adding a third and fourth carrier of band 41 would most certainly improve capacity a LOT, and would probably move Sprint to being the carrier with the most capacity at sites that have it enabled. But again, I'm not sure about the amount of backhaul that is there. So I'll let the more knowledgeable chime in.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand sprint is in the middle of adding 2xCA on 2.5GHz. If I am not wrong, sprint has on average 120 Mhz of spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band in 90 of the top 100 U.S. markets.

 

2.5 Ghz may not propagate far but the spectrum is excellent for capacity.

 

Instead of deploying 2x20, why not roll out 3x20 and if i am being way too optimistic 4x20. Kill the competition basically and make you use of this large swath of spectrum now, instead of doing it in pieces while the competition zooms past them.

 

What is stopping them to do so ?

What are are the technological challenges to deploy 2x20, 3x20 simultaneously ?

phones don't yet support 3 carrier agitation for band 41, so adding a third carrier would add capacity not max speed. I am unsure of the hardware requirements for 3 band 41 carriers. Perhaps someone else can answer if the 8t8r panels are capable of 3 CA?

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe 3xCA/4xCA requires testing, just like every other thing that is rolled out. And also the backhaul requirements are there, too. Having 3xCA or 4xCA, one or two 5 MHz Band 25 carriers (maybe one 10 MHz and one 5 MHz carrier), a 5 MHz Band 26 carrier, and several carries of 1x and EVDO, on 3 different sectors really adds up in the amount of backhaul required. A lot of sites probably just don't have enough backhaul yet to support it.

 

There are other people on the site, such as Tim or Robert, that are much more knowledgeable on the subject than I am, so don't just take my word for it. I'm sure they will chime in soon. :)

 

-Anthony

Thanks for your response. From what i understand they are doing it in waves, first go for 2x20 then move on the three CA. I agree they would need the required backhaul to support this, but i think doing it in waves just adds the additional costs. But yes if the backhaul is not available, no point of adding it

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...