Jump to content

AT&T to launch their first VoLTE smartphone before years end?


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Absolutely nothing because it's interleaved and interferes with public safety. AFAIK.

 

It is interleaved but it does not interfere with public safety. However it may interfere with other user of the band. Will they give it back to the FCC? Sell it? Donate it? Reband it? Buy out the rest of the spectrum holders?

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your comical.  "Desperately needs?"  When AT&T does it first and better they are desperate.  Right!

 

I'm sure by your own analysis Verizon desperately needed LTE because their 3G network sucks right?  

 

When AT&T goes and bids on 600 MHz spectrum please don't be the first in line to shout they already have too much spectrum and don't need it  

 

 

AT&T desperately needs LTE-A to stay competitive with the rest. They're mixing and matching 5Mhz/10Mhz in various markets as they have almost no contiguous clean spectrum swaths that are larger than 15Mhz FDD.

 

Verizon doesn't need LTE-A in immediate future they have clean chunks for 20Mhz FDD LTE in many markets. That'll also help battery life on the terminal side, as the UE radio avoids two streams/twice the processing power drawn.

 

T-Movile has quite a few markets with 2x20Mhz options planned out for 2014/15 time frame, and Sprint can just open its wings and fly on the insane amount of 2.6Ghz band from Clearwire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your comical.  "Desperately needs?"  When AT&T does it first and better they are desperate.  Right!

 

I'm sure by your own analysis Verizon desperately needed LTE because their 3G network sucks right?  

 

When AT&T goes and bids on 600 MHz spectrum please don't be the first in line to shout they already have too much spectrum and don't need it  

Has AT&T ever done something "better" than other US operators? Do they currently have a commercial LTE-A network?

I thought so. 

 

Now spare us from your personal attacks.

 

Moving on.. 

 

On a side note, Verizon actually started commercially broadcasting 20Mhz FDD LTE in NYC, and ironically I caught it earlier today during T-Mobile's UnCarrier 3.0 event in Bryant Park NYC.

Just as we are talking about no need for Carrier Aggregation lol...

 

ZybTFbE.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has AT&T ever done something "better" than other US operators? Do they currently have a commercial LTE-A network?

Um...yes? If you define "better" as "fastest average data speeds", then AT&T is (in aggregate) one of the best networks in the USA.

 

I get the hate. I know AT&T has terrible policies / pricing / ect. They abuse their landline monopoly. I truly get that. I know for a long time, they had a Sprint-like problem of not investing in their network for years.

 

But this "AT&T's network sucks" opinion is at least two years out of date in some markets. AT&T is consistently and objectively bringing home independent network awards in data speeds in a large number of markets. And it's not just on data speeds, but they're even winning awards in some markets for data reliability, and voice/sms service.

 

For smaller carriers like Sprint and T-Mobile to compete, they need to know what they're up against. And right now, Verizon and AT&T are usually trading 1st place in service quality in most markets across the US.

 

Here's a sampling of major markets where AT&T has won first place awards this year on data, voice, and sms service combined :

 

Washington DC - (Jan 2013)

http://www.rootmetrics.com/compare-carriers/united-states/washington-dc/washington-d.c.-january-2013/

 

Seattle, WA - (June 2013)

http://www.rootmetrics.com/compare-carriers/united-states/seattle/seattle-june-2013/

 

Boston, MA - (July 2013)

http://www.rootmetrics.com/compare-carriers/united-states/boston/boston-ma-july-2013/

 

Austin, TX - (Sept 2013)

http://rootmetrics.com/compare-carriers/united-states/austin/austin-tx-september-2013/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has AT&T ever done something "better" than other US operators? Do they currently have a commercial LTE-A network?

I thought so. 

 

Now spare us from your personal attacks.

 

Moving on.. 

 

On a side note, Verizon actually started commercially broadcasting 20Mhz FDD LTE in NYC, and ironically I caught it earlier today during T-Mobile's UnCarrier 3.0 event in Bryant Park NYC.

Just as we are talking about no need for Carrier Aggregation lol...

 

ZybTFbE.png

 

That's great to see! Verizon is well positioned from a spectrum point of view as far as strictly mobile is concerned. AT&T as well, once they consolidate their various 700MHz holdings and reclaim PCS and then 850MHz for LTE. WCS could help but I don't think they will need it for a while. T-Mobile with the addition of Metro and various spectrum swap deals also is positioned well. I was hoping that Sprint would have absorbed both Metro and Leap, but hey chose to go with Clearwire instead. I still want to know what they're going to to with the oodles of BRS/EBS spectrum they have and no, I don't think you need 160MHz of spectrum for mobile when you only have 50M customers. So Sprint/Softbank, enlighten us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are lots of markets where VZW has not yet leveraged their AWS assets, for example where I live I'd be shocked to ever see AWS anything other than when T-Mobile gets around to upgrading the EDGE where I live. They need it even where I live (population 8000, number of people on VZW seemingly 90 % of the town.)

 

I've tried for years to get VZW to add a third cell in downtown Chester and VZW blew that request off. It shouldn't be surprising that I'm seriously considering AT&T given what they have gained spectrum wise post ATNI buyout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...