Jump to content

Nokia considering NSN merger with Alcatel Lucent


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

There are rumors about talks at the Nokia board about considering a buy out of Alcatel Lucent. Considering that Alcatel Lucent is bleeding in cash and not doing well financially this might be their way out. 

 

What do you guys think?

 

http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/reports-nokias-board-considering-nsn-deal-alcatel-lucent/2013-09-26

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304526204579097711244440486.html

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have no problems with that as long as NOK is willing to pay a nice premium for ALU. Perhaps ERIC and/or some other companies might also take an interest and start a bidding war. That would be ideal imho  B) .

 

The Alcatel-Lucent patent portfolio is pretty extensive and could make for a nice asset in the hands of the right company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My hope is that LG tries to copy Samsung and buys Alcatel-Lucent (the network division, to be clear) so that Alcatel-Lucent could have the funding it needs while not taking a player out of the market.

 

I never thought about it it that way though.  Imagine LG network infrastructure equipment division.  The big question is will it provide timely software updates like it doesn't do on its LG mobile phone division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never thought about it it that way though.  Imagine LG network infrastructure equipment division.  The big question is will it provide timely software updates like it doesn't do on its LG mobile phone division.

I don't think it would be a big problem, what I would do is leave it on it's own while LG works on integrating it, while giving it the cash it needs to compete with Samsung/NSN/Ericsson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Nokia is the best partner for Alcatel, and I'm betting that the best company for improving the AlLu markets is NSN. 

Actually I think you mean Lucent, they were the ones with the network stuff while Alcatel makes phones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I think you mean Lucent, they were the ones with the network stuff while Alcatel makes phones.

Alcatel made network equipment pre-merger as well. I meant AlLu and it came out Alcatel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcatel made network equipment pre-merger as well. I meant AlLu and it came out Alcatel. 

Oh wow I didn't realize they made network equipment before the merger. It would hilarious though if Microsoft bought them just to troll Nokia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...