Jump to content

US/Mexico 800 MHz reband plan going to take 30 months??


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Since the announcement of the new US/Mexico 800 MHz reband plan as shown in the pic below, the FCC has made an announcement for the 800 MHz band reconfiguration to begin on August 23, 2013 and end on February 23, 2016. What is disappointing is that this 800 MHz band reconfiguration effort will take 30 months!!!!

 

Well at least we know now that the 800 MHz band along Mexico is in the process of being freed up so that markets like San Diego, Tucson, and the south parts of Orange County in 2016 will be able to use CDMA and LTE at 800 MHz.  From the new 800 MHz band plan it appears that 5.5 x 5.5 MHz will be freed up in the ESMR band which means that these markets will likely see a 1x CDMA carrier and a 3x3 LTE carrier.

 

Hopefully Sprint is working with the FCC and Canada to work out a 800 MHz band plan so that Sprint can use 800 MHz there for CDMA and LTE.

 

http://www.fcc.gov/document/commencement-800-mhz-band-reconfiguration-along-mexico-border

US_Mexico_800MHz_bandplan.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's more disappointing is that Sprint may not be able to use it anyway. The U.S.-Mexico shared block is the only part of that band that their current RRHs support. The U.S. block at 806-812.25 / 851-857.25 MHz will not be usable for Sprint's network. Unless that block is intended for federally owned systems?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's more disappointing is that Sprint may not be able to use it anyway. The U.S.-Mexico shared block is the only part of that band that their current RRHs support. The U.S. block at 806-812.25 / 851-857.25 MHz will not be usable for Sprint's network. Unless that block is intended for federally owned systems?

 

Why would Sprint sign off on this if it meant that they couldn't use the U.S.-Mexico shared block?  It says in the FCC document that current licenses would submit a cost estimate to Sprint so I assume that Sprint will be paying for licensees to relocate to another portion of the band.  I am hoping this presents some good news because it would suck if the 800 MHz could never be used.

 

If the 800 MHz can't be used then Sprint definitely needs to focus on obtaining some 600 MHz spectrum to fill in the gaps for low band spectrum in the Canada and Mexico IBEZ markets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't find the picture at the moment, but I am sure I saw markings on a panel or RRU that clearly stated 806-869 MHz.

 

It is the panel that supports 806-869 MHz for sure.  Not sure about the RRU but it might only support the ESMR band.  I can't remember.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's more disappointing is that Sprint may not be able to use it anyway. The U.S.-Mexico shared block is the only part of that band that their current RRHs support. The U.S. block at 806-812.25 / 851-857.25 MHz will not be usable for Sprint's network. Unless that block is intended for federally owned systems?

 

The lower block SMR 800 MHz spectrum is for Public Safety.  That is basically the same everywhere in the US.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lower block SMR 800 MHz spectrum is for Public Safety.  That is basically the same everywhere in the US.

 

AJ

 

I am curious of your opinion AJ...does this 800 MHz band plan reconfiguration when it is finally complete allow for Sprint to finally deploy LTE and CDMA at 800 MHz in the Mexico IBEZ markets?  I assume the allowable configurations would be a 3x3 LTE and a CDMA carrier since the shared block is only 5.5 x 5.5 MHz?

 

I have to think that Sprint wouldn't sign up for this especially if they have to pay the licensees to relocate to the proper location on the band if the end result was not able to use LTE and CDMA at the ESMR band.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any evidence that the US and Canada governments have worked out a 800 MHz band plan yet?  I would love to see progress on both sides of the borders to ensure 800 MHz can be used for CDMA and LTE in the next 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Canada has some action but along the western part of the Mexican border there are still several Mexican operators that Sprint doesn't seem to be in a rush to negotiate with. The Mexican operators aren't getting replacement bandwidth from Mexico for free at this time.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canada has some action but along the western part of the Mexican border there are still several Mexican operators that Sprint doesn't seem to be in a rush to negotiate with. The Mexican operators aren't getting replacement bandwidth from Mexico for free at this time.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

I'm in Michigan in the border area of the exclusion zone.  Just in the last two months have we started seeing eSMR spectrum be used for CDMA 1XA voice carriers.  Still no available LTE carriers, however, I don't have a spectrum analyzer to see what may be broadcasting, but not available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Bloosurf is petitioning to deny T-Mobile's request for an STA specifically in their service area. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=Ghl9knTSFp8J4nVm1P9qL4541XR1gy58whH7Yyz0MwGs037gQrNV!-2042069078!-79842837?applType=search&fileKey=1297203795&attachmentKey=21718533&attachmentInd=applAttach Short read but pretty much they're saying that T-Mobile's operations in the BRS/EBS band has been interfering with Bloosurf's LTE-based WISP network and that this has caused them harm (lose customers, etc.) They claim that allowing T-Mobile access to all of the spectrum they bought in or near Bloosurf's service area would cause even more interference. To be fair they aren't wrong. They mention that in 2021 the FCC investigated and determined that T-Mobile was operating outside of its licensed spectrum band there. However, I get the sense that Bloosurf is just trying to stop a competitor from operating in their service area. Typically carriers work this kind of stuff out among each other. Here in NYC, 3/4ths of Brooklyn has 140MHz of n41 deployed and the southern 1/4th of it has 80MHz deployed thanks to an incumbent that leases the spectrum from the archdiocese. In spite of that there are no complaints of interference from NextWave in such a dense environment. Seems to me like Bloosurf just doesn't want to coordinate with T-Mobile and would rather complain to delay the deployment of spectrum for as long as possible. EDIT: It's not just their service area, it's a larger area surrounding their service area as well. Something's fishy about this request. 
    • Really cool blog post from OpenSignal giving a broad overview over the mobile network experience in NYC.  https://www.opensignal.com/2023/03/30/localized-analysis-reveals-huge-network-experience-gaps-between-mobile-users-in-the-us
    • Bit too early to tell imo. It's good news if Dish can stop the hemorrhaging. Q3/Q4 2022 they were able to stop the hemorrhaging. Their previous 6 quarters they lost between 160k and 350k subs each. Their next report will be interesting to see how they were impacted subscriber wise due to the hack.
    • I really wish this wasn't still so shrouded in mystery.  I see these phones available new on eBay (Boost locked, but again, I don't care) for $99, and would love to buy one of those and activate a Rainbow SIM on the $100/year plan, and I can't find a good answer on whether or not that is something that can be done, even if I drove down to Richmond to try to do it.  Don't really want to be out the $100 if they won't let me do it. - Trip
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...