Jump to content

800 Voice Now Live - Phones not connecting to Airave anymore


Sim-X

Recommended Posts

So Sprint lit up 800 voice last night on a few towers near by. My signal levels are greatly improved but I still would like the phones to connect to the Airave since I have it for even higher signal strength. Phones are hopping on evdo still via the airave but voice it's using the tower. The setup in my office there is multiple Sprint phones on multiple accounts. It would always default to the airave before but now they are using 800 so is the repeater worthless now for voice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sprint lit up 800 voice last night on a few towers near by. My signal levels are greatly improved but I still would like the phones to connect to the Airave since I have it for even higher signal strength. Phones are hopping on evdo still via the airave but voice it's using the tower. The setup in my office there is multiple Sprint phones on multiple accounts. It would always default to the airave before but now they are using 800 so is the repeater worthless now for voice?

 

I believe if you're using a PRL with a higher priority for 1900 that will fix the issue, but I'm not 1000% sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they having any troubles with 800 Voice? If there's no issue, why bother? For voice, there's really no difference between "enough bars" and "full bars".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sprint lit up 800 voice last night on a few towers near by. My signal levels are greatly improved but I still would like the phones to connect to the Airave since I have it for even higher signal strength. Phones are hopping on evdo still via the airave but voice it's using the tower. The setup in my office there is multiple Sprint phones on multiple accounts. It would always default to the airave before but now they are using 800 so is the repeater worthless now for voice?

So many people wish they had your problem.  And it may not be a problem but actually a good thing.  If your 800 signal is at least decent and it works for you, just continue to use it and be be happy.  It is desirable in most cases. You do NOT need 6 bars for your phone to work well.   If the 800 gives you one or two bars and your phones do not drop calls, that is all you need and your service will be fine.   6 bars on your phones will not result in better calls than you are going to get with one or two bars on your 800 service.

Actually, your calls should sound better over 800 than an over an Airave.   Much of the time you have a delay issue on an Airave making it somewhat difficult to carry on the conversation.  800 does not have this issue.

 

Also, if you have 800 , this probably means your EVDO is also upgraded.  That is something we can not be sure about, but it probably has. 

if so, your EVDO is probably slightly better than it had been.  You may or may not need an Airave anymore. Try turning your Airave off and see what happens to your EVDO.  The signal may be weaker than on the Airave, but the EVDO may work fine.

An Airave may be a unnecessary complication you no longer need. (Maybe)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys, I was just more so curious than anything. This is the first day the phones have been on 800, I'm at -85 dBm on 800 where before it was much higher than that unless of course it was on the airave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Sprint lit up 800 voice last night on a few towers near by. My signal levels are greatly improved but I still would like the phones to connect to the Airave since I have it for even higher signal strength. Phones are hopping on evdo still via the airave but voice it's using the tower. The setup in my office there is multiple Sprint phones on multiple accounts. It would always default to the airave before but now they are using 800 so is the repeater worthless now for voice?

 

Not necessarily useless.  I assume these are not the 2.5 Airave's right?

 

I have helped a couple people with this very issue.  The big problem stems from if the user had a 800SMR site activated somewhat nearby the Android phones with BC10 support in the PRL will attempt to use this site over the Airave. PRLs do not make the network decision based on signal strength either.  So you could have  -60 1X signal from the Airave and have a -105 1X signal from the distant 800SMR site.  No matter what you do you could have dropped calls. 

 

To fix the issue you would need to create a custom PRL with your airave SID/NID combination above the 800SMR scan.  That way you would have the best of both world.  Airave in the house and 800SMR scan first when out and about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the first day the phones have been on 800, I'm at -85 dBm on 800 where before it was much higher than that unless of course it was on the airave.

 

Higher or lower?

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before 800 without airave -105 or worse in parts of the office some parts dropping calls or losing reception

 

Yeah, -105 dBm RSSI is lower and basically the edge of CDMA1X usability.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys, I was just more so curious than anything. This is the first day the phones have been on 800, I'm at -85 dBm on 800 where before it was much higher than that unless of course it was on the airave.

 a -85 is a very good level  to have.  That should work perfect for you.   I have that in my home and can even do down in a basement and still have a very usable signal.  Your experience may not necessarily be the same, but I am betting you are in fine shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An issue I've always had with the two Airaves I've had (2.0/2.5) is that if the internet were to go out (because TWC sucks), my phone will not switch off the Airave and will just not function.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't turned my Airave 2.5 off in a few months but I am afraid too I don't think 800MHz is turned on in my neighborhood. If I could get better voice calls in my house and send texts I would turn it off, I use WiFi at home I don't need 3G.

Edited by BlueAngel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...