Jump to content

Samsung Galaxy Note 3


linhpham2

Recommended Posts

If they would have just released 25 models of tri-band phones and updated 39,000 sites with all the bands last week this wouldn't be an issue! (Thinking harder about it -- what *IS* better to have first the device or the network??? chicken or egg)... This will be my last post on the issue -- but you really got me thinking about what is the better way to 'have it'...

 

I would prefer to have the device first.  That way, the very moment service is live in my area, I can use it.  And that's the way Sprint does it.  However, logisitically, this period is the absolute earliest that Sprint Dualband and Triband LTE devices could hit the market.  

 

So I definitely would not want them to wait to convert the Clearwire WiMax network to TD-LTE until devices were available.  I'm glad they could get a start on it before the devices versus waiting.  But I definitely would not want them to wait until the entire network is upgraded for them to sell the devices.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be the best damn RF performer in the world but you will stuck using that one lane highway for the 2 years you have it and that nice 10 lane interstate is staring at you and you can't use it. No thanks. Then to further rub it in you can't use the 800LTE either.

Yeah, which is why unless the tri-band phones out there turn out to be pitiful, I'll be looking outside the Sammy stable.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

I don't think any serious user should consider buying the Sprint Note 3 unless they were going to get a Sprint Triband hotspot to pair it with.  Network usability trumps all other phone features, including screen size. :imo:

 

Robert

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any serious user should consider buying the Sprint Note 3 unless they were going to get a Sprint Triband hotspot to pair it with. Network usability trumps all other phone features, including screen size. :imo:

 

Robert

Agree completely. No point if I can't get a reliable signal anywhere.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

...so just get it done as fast as possible (device OR network).

 

That's something I think we all can agree.  And the Clearwire TD-LTE deployment is going way faster.  For obvious reasons.  It's roughly the same scope as Tmo's LTE upgrade.  Overlay, baby!

 

Robert

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's something I think we all can agree. And the Clearwire TD-LTE deployment is going way faster. For obvious reasons. It's roughly the same scope as Tmo's LTE upgrade. Overlay, baby!

 

Robert

Unless you don't have anything to overlay :(

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overlay, baby!

Yes, getting overlaid is good, very good.

 

Unless you don't have anything to overlay :(

I guess digiblur gets underlaid.

 

:P

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than not getting laid ;)

 

Well, the prefix "under" is relative -- it could indicate zero.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint version Note 3 has finally cleared the FCC, can someone give us a rundown or an article like you guys have done on the front page for new phones like RF info, etc? Or in this thread if you have it now?

 

EDIT: The one thing I do love about my EVO LTE is that when I'm on a call I can still surf the web! My car broke down recently and I needed this to use GPS and some other stuff while waiting on a ten hour, lol, hold. :)

 

Thanks,

 

5th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Sprint version Note 3 has finally cleared the FCC, can someone give us a rundown or an article like you guys have done on the front page for new phones like RF info, etc? Or in this thread if you have it now?

 

EDIT: The one thing I do love about my EVO LTE is that when I'm on a call I can still surf the web! My car broke down recently and I needed this to use GPS and some other stuff while waiting on a ten hour, lol, hold. :)

 

Thanks,

 

5th

 

What do you want to know?  If you are looking to confirm triband LTE support for the Note 3, you will be disappointed.  The Note 3 will be single band LTE 1900 unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It can be the best damn RF performer in the world but you will stuck using that one lane highway for the 2 years you have it and that nice 10 lane interstate is staring at you and you can't use it. No thanks. Then to further rub it in you can't use the 800LTE either.

Well at least interstate 1900 won't be as congested. All the cool kids with their fancy new toys will be on interstate 2600 and 800, they'll spend less and less time on i1900. So even though it's a one lane highway hopefully it'll move a little faster once more and more ppl use the other 2 freeways. :)

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 4

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well at least interstate 1900 won't be as congested. All the cool kids with their fancy new toys will be on interstate 2600 and 800, they'll spend less and less time on i1900. So even though it's a one lane highway hopefully it'll move a little faster once more and more ppl use the other 2 freeways. :)

 

Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 4

 

I wouldn't say that.  There are still too many single band LTE 1900 phones out there so at least for the next 8 months or so it will still be congested.  Unless there is a huge flux of Wimax customers who have upgrades and flock to the LG G2, Nexus 5 and perhaps HTC One Max (assuming its triband) I wouldn't expect to see any difference in overall network balance of LTE 1900.  For a lot of Sprint customers that are not S4GRU members they will buy the Note 3 without knowing its not triband.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say that. There are still too many single band LTE 1900 phones out there so at least for the next 8 months or so it will still be congested. Unless there is a huge flux of Wimax customers who have upgrades and flock to the LG G2, Nexus 5 and perhaps HTC One Max (assuming its triband) I wouldn't expect to see any difference in overall network balance of LTE 1900. For a lot of Sprint customers that are not S4GRU members they will buy the Note 3 without knowing its not triband.

I'm just trying to look at the bright side here. Would've been huge for a triband gn3. For consumers and for the network. But oh well. I'm even glad the iPhone is at least dual band. Every little bit helps. Even if it means just one less phone streaming video on my sector, I'll take it. Every week should get better for the 1900ers. And who knows maybe by Christmas when all the new iPhones and Tribands are under the tree, all the 1900ers can enjoy streaming xmas logs with no issues. Including the gn3 adopters. Maybe. Doesn't solve indoor and fringe issues, but hey its something. No worse then the gn2 that people already love.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's for sure coming to sprint. We received something about it in our weekly news at work. There's not a date yet but Verizon has it listed as being released on 10/10 so I'd hope we're somewhere around there.

Did it have a model number?

 

Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to keep lying to myself and say, the official Sprint variant hasn't been released by the FCC yet. That the version released supports Bands 0/1/10/25 for roaming purposes for Softbank users and that another variant is still in testing.

 

Was it not stated during the Q2 call that all smartphones going forward was going to support Band 26 with the unspoken iPhone not being detailed yet?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would the addition of tri-band do the thickness of the phone if anything? Heard a clueless store employee telling someone that it would make it thicker and that was why the N3 wasn't getting it.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

It's just my opinion, but I really don't believe the variant that's been released is Sprint. This may be why an announcement from Sprint hasn't occurred yet. I understand Sprint is not VZW in demands, but Sprint still has to buy the Note 3 from Samsung and if the device isn't up to par and direction of where Sprint is going, they don't have to buy it. They've said no to devices before. I personally believe Samsung has made a solid amount of money from Sprint so why not accommodate the network the provider supports. It looks bad when two users are getting two different experiences from the same provider from two different manufactures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the way your thinking COZisback. If the note 3 wasn't at least dual band id be extremely disappointed. Really not wanting a htc or lg phone ever!

 

Sent from my rooted G Note 2 Using TapaTalk 4 Beta

 

What is wrong with HTC or LG?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...